tomorrow 'kicking off' the start of Soccer's World Cup. This is an excellent opportunity for USA to embarass BP and all the other british poofters. Here's a link for you faggots
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:24 pm
by Mikey
I think it got "kicked off" today.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:24 pm
by BSmack
And here's a link for you Barf.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:56 pm
by BarFlie
Mikey wrote:I think it got "kicked off" today.
wouldn't know mikey, not a fan
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 8:58 pm
by BarFlie
BSmack wrote:And here's a link for you Barf.
heard that already but thanks for trying :D
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 9:18 pm
by Mikey
BarFlie wrote:
Mikey wrote:I think it got "kicked off" today.
wouldn't know mikey, not a fan
So, you like to post about shit you know absolutely nothing about.
How come that doesn't surprise me?
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:04 pm
by BarFlie
Sometimes I just like to post stuff to see what the response might be. So far, I give you a C-
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:24 pm
by mvscal
Soccer, huh? And served up in an African shithole no less. Yeah, I give a fuck....
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:25 pm
by Wolfman
Damn--I was afraid the War of 1812 has broken out again.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 3:51 am
by Smackie Chan
Jsc810 wrote:Where is Nish?
Probably ringing up a sale of butt plugs, cock rings, and Ben-wa balls.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:02 am
by War Wagon
BarFlie wrote:Sometimes I just like to post stuff to see what the response might be. So far, I give you a C-
you're grading Mikeys' papers?
Not a good idea.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:22 am
by Roger_the_Shrubber
Upset!
USA - 2
England - 1
I am probably wrong, But, unlike my legs, I just have a feeling.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:23 am
by BSmack
Wolfman wrote:Damn--I was afraid the War of 1812 has broken out again.
I congratulate you and Andrew Jackson for fighting off the British as New Orleans.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 4:25 am
by Roger_the_Shrubber
C,mon B!!!
Wolfman was only a teenager then.
PS - He also knew the war ended a month earlier. He just hates Brits.
:D
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:58 am
by BarFlie
War Wagon wrote:
BarFlie wrote:Sometimes I just like to post stuff to see what the response might be. So far, I give you a C-
you're grading Mikeys' papers?
Not a good idea.
I'm giving you an F
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:29 pm
by BSmack
I'll be spinning tunes in chat for the game for all those who can't stand those fucking horns.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:12 pm
by BSmack
USA!!!! USA!!!
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:21 pm
by mvscal
Did we lose? Hopefully so. I'm sure nobody wants to spend any more time than they have to on the shit-crusted rim of Planet Earth's anus.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 7:23 pm
by BSmack
mvscal wrote:Did we lose? Hopefully so. I'm sure nobody wants to spend any more time than they have to on the shit-crusted rim of Planet Earth's anus.
I'm fairly certain the World Cup is not being played in Fresno.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 12:39 am
by smackaholic
If this doesn't bring Nish in here, nothing will.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:36 am
by War Wagon
Gay sex will, thanks for doing your part cockaholic.
As for the game, England dominated start to finish. Getting a tie was sorta' like you and Van rubbing boners inside Jess.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:09 am
by mvscal
A 1-1 tie is about as gay as it gets. What a stupid game.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:10 am
by PSUFAN
Word. I just can't give a fuck about soccer, try as I may (not).
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:14 am
by Dr_Phibes
True, it doesn't suit a short attention span.
There aren't blinking lights, scoring every three seconds and half a million other indicators to tell you what's going on. You've just got to figure it out for yourself. :(
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:26 am
by PSUFAN
As you wish...but soccer is fucking boring, dood
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 4:42 am
by War Wagon
Dr_Phibes wrote:True, it doesn't suit a short attention span.
There aren't blinking lights, scoring every three seconds and half a million other indicators to tell you what's going on. You've just got to figure it out for yourself. :(
You're just spazzing because dear leaders team won, beating the only other country with more shame.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:08 am
by BSmack
Dr_Phibes wrote:True, it doesn't suit a short attention span. There aren't blinking lights, scoring every three seconds and half a million other indicators to tell you what's going on. You've just got to figure it out for yourself. :(
The average NFL game has 21 points scored in 60 minutes of play. That is 3 TDs or 7 FGs or a combination thereof. It averages to a scoring play at best every 8 minutes or so.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:17 am
by R-Jack
Dr_Phibes wrote:
half a million other indicators to tell you what's going on. You've just got to figure it out for yourself. :(
No bells or whistles needed to figure out what is going on. Look at your TV. You see fags in short shorts running in a meadow. Look to the left of your screen and see a zero. Look to the right of your screen and see a zero. Look to your remote and click.
Soccer is simple. The hard part if figuring why the rest of the shitsucking planet creams themselves like Diego at a Justin Beiber concert over it.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:58 am
by Dr_Phibes
You see fags in short shorts running in a meadow
Most summer sports are played in meadows, I've never felt meadows are something to be concerned about.
Meadows aren't threatening, they haven't got an evil leader.
Meadows didn't knock down the world trade centres. I've never felt the need to cover myself in armour, put on a helmet, shoulder pads to play sport in a meadow.
Australians play full contact sport in meadows and don't need to don full body armour,.
A manly pair of short trousers do every time, the short shorts came be chalked up to your questionable imagination.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:10 am
by BSmack
Toddowen wrote:Ladies figure skaters landing head first into the ice get right back on their skates again as long as they are conscious. One soccer players long wavy trusses brushes another, and they both immediately drop to the turf trying to outdo each others agony throe. All you need to know about soccer.
Have you actually been to a professional match in person? They aren't playing pattycakes out there.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:07 am
by poptart
Get your ... FREE SEX!!!*
*Only women are available
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:03 pm
by Wolfman
I've been trying to figure out why I do not care for soccer. Sure---it is a demanding sport physically in spite of the theatrics that happen any time someone gets "hurt"; I'll give soccer fan that much. But the real question is why do most Americans like myself consider the sport to be boring/lame or what have you.
I think there are multiple factors for this:
#1--Americans are sport's statistics freaks. Baseball has many:batting averages, pitching ERA's, stolen bases, strikeouts, etc..
Football (our sport) has Yards rushing, QB stats, sacks, receptions, run backs, etc. There is nothing like that for soccer fan.
#2-- Our major sports have events that happen within the game that are crowd pleasers: home runs, double plays, amazing spin dunk moves, long break away runs, etc. That make you want to watch closely so you don't miss them. Soccer just has one--GOAL, not even a crushing body check into the boards like hockey or a good old fashioned NHL glove dropping brawl.
Food for thought.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:19 pm
by Moving Sale
R-Jack wrote: The hard part if figuring why the rest of the shitsucking planet creams themselves like Diego at a Justin Beiber concert over it.
More sex with minors smack from a pedophile. :doh:
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:20 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Not enough beer commercials and soul-crushing colour commentary.
Plus, big fat couch potatoes can't identify with soccer players.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:22 pm
by Moving Sale
mvscal wrote: And served up in an African shithole no less.
Much like a gulf pelican, you are predictably slimy.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:31 pm
by Dr_Phibes
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:34 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
I find olympic and World Cup soccer to be quite watchable, but any sport that can end in a scoreless tie is fundamentally flawed.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:50 pm
by BSmack
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I find olympic and World Cup soccer to be quite watchable, but any sport that can end in a scoreless tie is fundamentally flawed.
You mean like regular season NFL football and hockey?
At least on the theoretical level.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:58 pm
by Dr_Phibes
The scoreline isn't always an accurate measurement of the game itself. With less scoring comes more release when it does go in, there's more work put into it and the rewards are greater. It's like having a choice between three Big Macs or a single steak tenderloin.
Re: United States vs England
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 5:59 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Yeah, it happens sooooo often in football Donovan McNabb didn't even know it was possible.