Page 1 of 1
No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:40 am
by mvscal
OK, liberal sperm burpers. Are you willing to (send someone else to) fight for the raw materials necessary to build your faggoty electric cars? It appears that the 21st century is going to look a fuck of a lot like the 20th.
Good job, shitstains....
An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys.
{and lithium ion electric car batteries}
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world ... wt=nytimes
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:53 am
by Mikey
With all the lithium going to car batteries, where are you going to get your meds?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 6:18 am
by LTS TRN 2
Come now, Avi, surely you and Rusp Limpdick appreciate the "exceptionalism" which permits--nay,
demands--that we secure and develop these essential transnational corporate "nutrients," (or, nutrients) etc. After all, why did we invade Vietnam? Why did 58,000 Americans die if not to
attempt to secure huge mineral resources in
Indochine Or
what?
You
do appear to be medicated, but so what?
WW
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:14 pm
by Wolfman
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 1:29 pm
by Carson
This would explain why we didn't nuke Afghanistan into glass back in 2001.
Nice to know they have something other than opium.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:50 am
by Moving Sale
mvscal wrote:
An internal Pentagon memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,” a key raw material in the manufacture of batteries for laptops and BlackBerrys.
{and lithium ion electric car batteries}
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/14/world ... wt=nytimes
Those of us that were watching have known that for years. How many times are you going to beat your own self in the face with a hammer?
http://www.gl.iit.edu/govdocs/afghanistan/Industry.html
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 12:48 pm
by Carson
I guess back then you also figured out Santa Claus wasn't going to hire you.
A fucking Nostradamus you are.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:21 pm
by Moving Sale
Carson wrote:I guess back then you also figured out Santa Claus wasn't going to hire you.
Bottom rung of the smack later much you cum swilling assface?
A fucking Nostradamus you are.
Good g0d you are stupid. This has NOTHING to do with predicting the future. Can You read?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 6:34 pm
by Dinsdale
Moving Sale wrote:
Bottom rung of the smack later...
Can You read?
Can you write without sounding like a 4th grade remedial English student in Arkansas?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:12 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
"By 1985 Soviet surveys had also revealed potentially useful deposits of asbestos, nickel, mercury, lead, zinc, bauxite, lithium, and rubies."
Oh yeah.
Your link really lays it out there about the value of the lithium, eh?

Potentially useful = trillion. Got it.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 7:46 pm
by mvscal
He also seems to be struggling with the phrase, 'far beyond any previously known reserves,' but that happens a lot to dumbfucks.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:24 pm
by Moving Sale
Dinsdale wrote:Can you write without sounding like a 4th grade remedial English student in Arkansas?
STFU and finish what you started you dive-by ADD assfuck.
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 42#p680142
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:29 pm
by Moving Sale
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Your link really lays it out there about the value of the lithium, eh?

Potentially useful = trillion. Got it.
If you were paying attention that part of the story was reveled in the USGS results that were announced in 2007 at the 3rd annual U.S.-Afghan Business Matchmaking Conference.
Do you TRY to sound so stupid or does it come naturally?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 8:30 pm
by Moving Sale
mvscal wrote:He also seems to be struggling with the phrase, 'far beyond any previously known reserves,' but that happens a lot to dumbfucks.
You seem to be struggling which came first, 2007 or 2010.
Have you EVER been right about anything?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:48 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Moving Sale wrote:ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Your link really lays it out there about the value of the lithium, eh?

Potentially useful = trillion. Got it.
If you were paying attention that part of the story was reveled in the USGS results that were announced in 2007 at the 3rd annual U.S.-Afghan Business Matchmaking Conference.
Do you TRY to sound so stupid or does it come naturally?
And this makes your shit link better... how? You do realize I was questioning the lack of anything informative in your link, right? I mean. I did use the word link, correct? Can you read?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:51 pm
by Carson
Moving Sale wrote:STFU and finish what you started you dive-by ADD assfuck.
Buckwheat, is that you?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:54 pm
by PSUFAN
Bwaaahaha...yes, he's a bleached buckwheat.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:56 pm
by Moving Sale
The link was to show how old this info is. The specific point that the minerals are worth and estimated one trillion dollars was not in the link. This seemed to be a bone of contention with you so I pointed out that even that info was still at least three years old at which point you smashed your keyboard against your face and then pushed submit. You are about as dumb as a cabinet full of rusty nails.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:57 pm
by Moving Sale
Carson wrote:Moving Sale wrote:STFU and finish what you started you dive-by ADD assfuck.
Buckwheat, is that you?
When you graduate from typo smack give me a ring and I'll throw you a party.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:25 pm
by BarFlie
way to go moving sale... better than a mikey melt
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:32 pm
by Moving Sale
When I want the opinion of a cum licking junkie I'll call you.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 10:41 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Moving Sale wrote:The link was to show how old this info is. The specific point that the minerals are worth and estimated one trillion dollars was not in the link. This seemed to be a bone of contention with you so I pointed out that even that info was still at least three years old at which point you smashed your keyboard against your face and then pushed submit. You are about as dumb as a cabinet full of rusty nails.
Wrong. Your link should have provided proof that it was common knowledge that there's an assload of lithium in Afghanistan.
By contrast.
Your shit link told us about
potentially useful deposits of lithium... and 7 other items. That's it. It didn't confirm the depth of the findings. Look, douche. You have the potential to not be the worst poster on this board, but until you provide me with something that proves otherwise... potential is all you have. Follow?
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:06 pm
by BarFlie
Moving Sale wrote:When I want the opinion of a cum licking junkie I'll call you.
Be sure to watch Obama's address tonight so you can come back here and make an informed comment on the current chimp of change debacle. tia
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 10:37 pm
by Moving Sale
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Your link should have provided proof that it was common knowledge that there's an assload of lithium in Afghanistan.
We have been thru this you stammering fuckbucket. Even if you are right there is still the 2007 conference. This news is not new. Follow? Of course you don't.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 11:40 pm
by PSUFAN
I wondered why my cell phone battery called me a vapid racist fukkstik.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 12:23 am
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Moving Sale wrote:We have been thru this you stammering fuckbucket. Even if you are right there is still the 2007 conference. This news is not new. Follow? Of course you don't.
Show me where I was questioning whether or not this was news. Your original post failed to deliver your intended message. I could give two fucks about the conference. You didn't mention it in the post I originally replied to.
For the last fucking time... your link sucked. Your shit rebuttle doesn't address that point, does it?
Moving Sale wrote:But, but... the conference.
Shut the fuck up, you lisping faggot.
Re: No Blood for Lithium!!
Posted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 6:38 pm
by Moving Sale
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: Your original post failed to deliver your intended message.
Well to you it did because you have your head up a gerbil's butt. Those of us that can read and have been following this have known for years that they have lots of mineral deposits. As I have said before you are right that the two links don't line up perfectly. I have already given you that. The point of my first post was that mvskkkal is a stupid fuck for acting like this new news is actually new news. Way to pound yourself in the dick and look even stoopider than a guy who is never right you vapid mis-shapen trog.
I could give two fucks about the conference.
Because you're cumlicking fuckstick.