T1B

One of the reasons we're stuck with retarded libs representing California is because every GOP idiot that runs for a major office aligns themselves with the gun nuts. So surely this crop of GOP candidates will have learned from this and try to not to piss off the moderates that represent 30% of the states voters, right?

Fiorina Opposes Assault Weapon Ban

And...we're fucked.

Gun nuts? Go fuck yourself, shitstain.

Much better than aligning with the "legalize dope and let the drug mules into our country" crowd.

You and your ilk, who wrap the constitution around your bullshit view, as if the guys who wrote it in the musket age intended the same argument to apply to an AK-47 with a 100-round drum, are the biggest reason CA Dems win every election that matters.

Yeah, I know, it's a fluid document...when you want it to be.

So let the "gun nuts" take their auto weapons down to the border and eliminate the drug traffic.

Border security goes up. Guns leave the cities.

Sounds like a win-win.

The first folks to shoot up the gun nuts who would police the border would be the illegal employers who exploit the current situation.

Carson wrote:Much better than aligning with the "legalize dope and let the drug mules into our country" crowd.

Good call, you fucking idiot.

OCmike wrote:You and your ilk, who wrap the constitution around your bullshit view, as if the guys who wrote it in the musket age intended the same argument to apply to an AK-47 with a 100-round drum, are the biggest reason CA Dems win every election that matters.

.

And here I thought it was the dumbfuck California voters who were at fault

PSUFAN wrote:The first folks to shoot up the gun nuts who would police the border would be the illegal employers who exploit the current situation.

And most of them do it completely legally, and within the laws of the Federal and state governments. Tell me you knew.

OCmike wrote:You and your ilk, who wrap the constitution around your bullshit view, as if the guys who wrote it in the musket age intended the same argument to apply to an AK-47 with a 100-round drum, are the biggest reason CA Dems win every election that matters.

Yeah, I know, it's a fluid document...when you want it to be.

A musket in that day was a modern assault weapon. Nothing has changed.

You, on the other hand, remain the same cowering, shitsmeared, nanny state fuckstick that the 2nd Amendment is designed to protect against. Any other fundamental rights you would like to give up while you're on your knees sucking off every libtard pol who shoves a dick in your face?

mvscal wrote:A musket in that day was a modern assault weapon. Nothing has changed.

Nope, nothing's changed in over 200 years since the Revolution. Christ, I've owned firearms since I was 10 years old. I've hunted and shot rifles in competition. I DON'T want anyone taking my guns from me. But even I recognize that it might not be a good idea to have every Tom, Dick and Screw Michigan girlfriend packing an AK-47.

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:A musket in that day was a modern assault weapon. Nothing has changed.

Nope, nothing's changed in over 200 years since the Revolution. Christ, I've owned firearms since I was 10 years old. I've hunted and shot rifles in competition. I DON'T want anyone taking my guns from me. But even I recognize that it might not be a good idea to have every Tom, Dick and Screw Michigan girlfriend packing an AK-47.

Same here.

The biggest problem I have with AK's in an urban setting is that there's no fucking way you're stopping stray bullets from going into the next house over, when John Q. Public empties a clip at a burglar at 3AM.

BSmack wrote: I DON'T want anyone taking my guns from me.

Oh....you just want to take them away from other people. Gotcha. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

Hey Phibes, get ready with the garden hose...I think the Americans are fighting again.

empties a clip??

Few weapons use clips, but many use a magazine. My anti-burglar weapon of choice is a 12 gauge double barreled Winchester. If someone wakes me up they will be looking at the business end, and Florida has some home owner friendly laws about it all.

Derron wrote:

PSUFAN wrote:The first folks to shoot up the gun nuts who would police the border would be the illegal employers who exploit the current situation.

And most of them do it completely legally, and within the laws of the Federal and state governments. Tell me you knew.

I don't think you uderstoo...ahhh, fuggit.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote: I DON'T want anyone taking my guns from me.

Oh....you just want to take them away from other people. Gotcha. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

So is it that you don't want anyone to tell you what to do out of principle or that an assault weapon ban will destroy any chance you have of living out a homoerotic "Red Dawn" fantasy with your gun nut pals. Based on your scat references and graphic gay sex visuals in this thread, I'm guessing it's the latter.

OCmike wrote:

mvscal wrote:Oh....you just want to take them away from other people. Gotcha. Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way.

So is it that you don't want anyone to tell you what to do out of principle or that an assault weapon ban will destroy any chance you have of living out a homoerotic "Red Dawn" fantasy with your gun nut pals. Based on your scat references and graphic gay sex visuals in this thread, I'm guessing it's the latter.

You just know mv was the one who went nuts after drinking the blood.