T1B

Super Bowl XL's Butchered Officiating


I tried to pull a Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff and pull up that years old thread where BSkunk endlessly and sickeningly defended the horsehit officiating that took place in that debacle of a Stupor Bowl, but I couldn't find the thread.
Yes, the pitiful officiating which helped Pittspuke walk away with the Lombardi Trophy that day.

Everyone in here knew it was horsehit, and said so, but B kept assuring us that he knew best, and it was all legit.




Time for you, 4+ years later, to finally come correct, 'tard.

Will B admit he was wrong?

Did B stiff a fellow troll out of $15?

They decided the game on the two horseshit calls on Darrell Jackson's touchdowns and Rapistbergers non-TD. The fourth quarter botches were icing on the cake.

For starters, Bill Leavy never said which calls he thought were "butchered." Was he talking about when Clark Haggans was dragged to the ground by Sean Locklear?

I saw two bad calls in that game. One was when Hasselbeck got flagged for clipping. And the other was against Pittsburgh when the refs refused to call blocking in the back on a Seattle INT return.

As far as I am concerned, Leavy is a pussy who was trying to make nice to Seachicken fans. If he really felt this way, he should have said it a long time ago, But no, he waits for his first trip back to Seattle since the game. Fuck him.

Here ya go, Pops:

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 18&start=0

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 42&start=0

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 89&start=0

Thanks, ucant.
Good work there.

B wrote:As far as I am concerned, Leavy is a pussy who was trying to make nice to Seachicken fans. If he really felt this way, he should have said it a long time ago, But no, he waits for his first trip back to Seattle since the game. Fuck him.

lol

Yeah, that's about the amount of SACK I expected to see from BSkunk.

Try to slip around it by saying we don't know which calls Leavy is talking about.

Well, B, he apologized to Seahawk fan, so even if we don't know for sure which specific calls he is claiming to have butchered, we DO know for sure that he hosed SEATTLE and NOT Pittsburgh.

So yeah, your boys got over that day with the aid of the zebra crew.

So much so that the official had 'sleepless nights' over it.

It obviously impacted the game in a significant way, in his estimation.


I agree that Leavy should have owned up to the errors long ago, BUT I'm pretty sure the NFL office put the word out very clearly to him that it'd not be in his best interest to do that.

That's how they roll.

And this thread is just more evidence of how sacklessly you roll.

poptart wrote:It obviously impacted the game in a significant way, in his estimation.

Then he should have been able to recall which calls it was that he "booted."

Who says he can't recall?

poptart wrote:Who says he can't recall?

Either he can't recall or he's too chicken shit to name the plays. Neither helps his credibility.

BSmack wrote:

poptart wrote:Who says he can't recall?

Either he can't recall or he's too chicken shit to name the plays. Neither helps his credibility.

You are refusing to accept that he's admitting to handing the Squealers the game on a silver fucking platter. The fact that you would even consider the word "credibility" in any response is laughable.

BSmack wrote:Neither helps his credibility.

Riiiiight. He must be lying about blowing calls in the Superbowl just to make the Squealers look bad.

Kill yourself, you pathetic douche.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:Neither helps his credibility.

Riiiiight. He must be lying about blowing calls in the Superbowl just to make the Squealers look bad. Kill yourself, you pathetic douche.

No, more like he's throwing a bone to Seahawk players and fans. Without any specifics, his "confession" is nothing more than a cipher.

Other then Big O, who really gives a shit?

Right after that game, B went on for days, telling us what we saw with our very own eyes wasn't really what we saw with our very own eyes.

And now, almost 5 years later, when the official has admitted blowing calls in favor of Pittsburgh, B seems poised to go on for days telling us it doesn't matter because the official has no credibility.


Credibility?

Classic.

poptart wrote:Right after that game, B went on for days, telling us what we saw with our very own eyes wasn't really what we saw with our very own eyes.

And now, almost 5 years later, when the official has admitted blowing calls in favor of Pittsburgh, B seems poised to go on for days telling us it doesn't matter because the official has no credibility. Credibility? Classic.

Actually, he never said who the calls were in favor of. He only said they impacted the game. I don't think a team playing well enough to win would have been adversely impacted by any of the calls made in that game. The Seahawks botched their clock management at the end of both halves, their normally automatic kicker had one of his worst days as a pro, Jeremy Stevens couldn't catch a cold and their defense gave up 3 HUGE plays. THAT'S why the Seahawks lost.

BSkunk wrote:Actually, he never said who the calls were in favor of. He only said they impacted the game.

I know, and he didn't tell us what the definition of the word is is, either.


You stupid fucking cunt.

BSmack wrote:Actually, he never said who the calls were in favor of. He only said they impacted the game.

Since you are the one accusing the ref of trying to appease Seattle fans, who the fuck do you think they were in favor for?

Keep spinning rapist supporter.

poptart wrote:I know, and he didn't tell us what the definition of the word is is, either.

Think whatever you like. The fact remains that the Steelers are Super Bowl XL Champions. And nothing that ref or anybody else says will ever change that. The Seahawks had numerous chances to run away with that game and failed to capitalize on all of them.



Suck it.