T1B

holy shit!

Roach wrote:Very Nice Color Guard

In that vid, the LT has a single move that requires a modicum of coordination, putting his sword into it's scabbard and he stumbles through it pretty badly.

Other than that, a nice drill. Not as nice as the Old Guard's team though. Those fukkers are so in sync it is ridiculous.

KC Scott wrote:I think that's the full extent of what a sailor can do with a rifle

nahhh, a full extent of what a squid can do with a rifle was demonstrated a while back when that seal team did simultaneous head shots on those pirates.

Roach wrote:Very Nice Color Guard

That's the fact, JACK!

It's the nautical version of 'Grease'.

And..how much grease do you suppose these trim lads use each night after rehearsal? It's like Cirque du Soliel if Germany had won the war.

You're a homo.

Huh? Oh, I get it...you just rush anything up there when you see my name--so no one else will rush to see what I've added. Makes sense in a demented sort of way.

Anyhoot, this sort of military pageantry is much more typical of North Korea and similar bizarre locales..

Watch out for those spatulas, someone could get hurt!


One false step and those pocket protectors will cut you up


Stay precise, ladies, or we'll have an international up-skirt situation that could get serious

The only thing special about you is that your posts are full of homosexual references. Almost always non sequitur. Therefore it is not much of stretch to say you are a homo.

Maybe not practicing yet, but a homo none the less.

No, actually I'm not in the auto-homosmack contingent. I only mentioned it this time because..well, it's pretty fucking obvious looking at those baton-twirling marines that they're not really into getting dirty and mean. Uh...?...

LTS TRN 2 wrote:And..how much grease do you suppose these trim lads use each night after rehearsal? It's like Cirque du Soliel if Germany had won the war.

You ought to be able to make a pretty fair estimate, Felchco.

No, I just make good jokes. What's your excuse again?

LTS TRN 2 wrote:No, I just make good jokes.

Be sure to let us know if you ever decide to tell one.

Felchco buys the large cans of Crisco with his WIC card; his boyfriends can get their whole fist down in them.

Papa Willie wrote:

Roach wrote:Very Nice Color Guard

Whole lotta trust going on in that. Impressive.

As much trust as you place in these guys?...How impressive

Keep fighting


We'll get it right this time


This needn't ever end...oh yeah!..



examine this..
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/

The analysis demonstrates that the Bush administration swiftly abandoned plans for diplomacy to curb fancied Iraqi adventurism by means of sanctions, never had a plan subsequent to that except for a military solution, and enmeshed British allies in a manipulation of public opinion on both sides of the Atlantic designed to generate support for a war. This time the case is made with actual secret government records, not merely the press releases and talking points of the neo-cons.

Just three days into the Bush administration, the documents released by the National Security Archive show, U.S. Secretary of State Colin L. Powell had already been made aware that regime change in Iraq would be a primary focus of Bush policy. The administration's intent to have its way, by opinion manipulation if necessary, is indicated by its determination to exploit the perceived propaganda value of certain aluminum tubes seized in the summer of 2001, even before any technical evaluation of their utility in Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) programs had been completed. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld issued his first instructions regarding an Iraq war plan to the Joint Chiefs of Staff on September 29, 2001--even as the first CIA teams arrived in Afghanistan and before the United States had begun bombarding that country. From December 2001 on the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) revised and refined attack options, continually prodded by Rumsfeld.

In contrast to an extensive record of planning for actual military operations, there is no record that President George W. Bush ever made a considered decision for war. All of the numerous White House and Pentagon meetings concerned moving the project forward, not whether a march into conflict was a proper course for the United States and its allies. Deliberations were instrumental to furthering the war project, not considerations of the basic course. Moreover, the administration engaged in active measures to avoid scrutiny of its intentions, with the president repeatedly claiming there were no war plans "on his desk." The testimony of senior British military officers to the United Kingdom's Iraq Inquiry (the Chilcot commission), documented in the Archive's analyses, explicitly demonstrates that even America's closest ally was closed out of the CENTCOM planning until "Operation Iraqi Freedom" was far down the road.

Now this is tedious auto-homosmack.

C'mon...where's the wonder at how the Nazi Field Marshall, Von Weichs, is a dead ringer for our own international war criminal, Rummy? Where's the wonder? :o

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Now this is tedious auto-homosmack.

C'mon...where's the wonder at how the Nazi Field Marshall, Von Weichs, is a dead ringer for our own international war criminal, Rummy? Where's the wonder? :o

Von Weichs wasn't a Nazi, you fucking shit-for-brains.
He was an old-school, Prussian style officer. They made up the majority of OKH (The General Staff) and they loathed Hitler.


Never post again, you gay retard.

Gimmie a break, b-juice. The pope wasn't a Nazi either, right? I'm sure he too loathed Hitler. Just like Charles Lindbergh, Henry Ford and Prescott Bush? :D They just loathed him.

Shut the fuck up already, you tedious cunt.

B-juice? Are you actually the lil' prick known as Avi? Cuz you sure match up. You know, grammatical markers, etc.

Anyways, if Rummy and his Permanent War is any indication, the Nazis clearly won. The ZioNazis are the new proxy front--just look at them..



and their motion..




Wakey Wake :wink:

Here's a nice GOP candidate from Ohio who of course loathes the Nazis--but just can't help being fascinated at their prowess, etc., and oh, what the hell, let's dress up like an SS officer!


http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc ... azi/64319/

And check his recruitment vid--strictly for historical reenactment purposes, of course. :wink:
http://www.wiking.org/topics/renactng.htm

What is a "Tea Bagger"?

Hi...I'm not a witch..


After the Apple Festival parade broke up Saturday, Republican Rich Iott stood on a Main Street front lawn and downplayed photographs of him dressed in a Nazi uniform with the insignia of a deadly Waffen SS unit.

The congressional candidate said the years-old photographs were from one of the many historical re-enactments of battles he and his son took part in for years.

"It's looking at it strictly from a historical or military point of view," he said. "There's a bunch of guys that do Roman legion re-enactments; they don't endorse feeding Christians to lions. … Anybody who's involved in re-enacting, no matter what uniform you are wearing or time period you're representing, you're not endorsing the ideologies of that time."

Okay, you liberals, prepare to meet the second amendment..


So..who wants to repeal amendments 14, 15, and 16?


Wakey wake...(they're here! :wink: )