Seems that the Obama hate has pretty much dissipated seeing as I haven't seen this nonsense...
...in a while.
Also, the Birther Kooks have pretty much gone to ground. Haven't heard the words Kenyan and secret Muslim mixed into the same sentence in almost half a year.
What would you credit your Commander-In-Chief's resurgence to?
Can he maintain this wave of adoration into his second term?
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:35 pm
by indyfrisco
Martyred wrote:I haven't seen this...
...in a while.
No need to advertise once it is accepted.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:41 pm
by Wolfman
Must be you missed those "birthers" Chris Matthews and the Governor of Hawaii saying they want to prove he was born in the USA. I find it mildly interesting that they feel the issue has not been really put to rest. What I'd like to see are his college year's data. Give me the reason for hiding that.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:46 pm
by BSmack
Wolfman wrote:Must be you missed those "birthers" Chris Matthews and the Governor of Hawaii saying they want to prove he was born in the USA. I find it mildly interesting that they feel the issue has not been really put to rest. What I'd like to see are his college year's data. Give me the reason for hiding that.
Because it is none of your business. Or don't you remember Bush locking down all of his private records as well? Seems you didn't have a problem when he did it. Love Obama or hate him, the man still has a right to some privacy protections.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:48 pm
by Derron
Wolfman wrote:Must be you missed those "birthers" Chris Matthews and the Governor of Hawaii saying they want to prove he was born in the USA. I find it mildly interesting that they feel the issue has not been really put to rest. What I'd like to see are his college year's data. Give me the reason for hiding that.
And cue the libtard response to be : " Go fuck yourselves "birthers"..it is none of your business"
And that will be that and the stonewall will continue. It is what it is.
Damn B breaks it out first !
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:50 pm
by BSmack
Derron wrote:Go fuck yourselves "birthers"..it is none of your business
That's an even better way of putting it.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 6:53 pm
by trev
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:19 pm
by Carson
Wolfman wrote:What I'd like to see are his college year's data. Give me the reason for hiding that.
That's none your business.
Sin,
Cam Newton
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 7:28 pm
by Derron
BSmack wrote:
Derron wrote:Go fuck yourselves "birthers"..it is none of your business
That's an even better way of putting it.
So you are down with the stonewall thing ?
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:47 pm
by Moving Sale
Derron wrote:
And cue the libtard response to be : " Go fuck yourselves "birthers"..it is none of your business"!
Where do you think he was born?
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:51 pm
by Moving Sale
trev wrote:rasmussenreports.com
I laughed.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:53 pm
by Derron
Moving Sale wrote:
Derron wrote:
And cue the libtard response to be : " Go fuck yourselves "birthers"..it is none of your business"!
Where do you think he was born?
Probably spewed out of your mothers vile cunt right after you....your thought process's and his seem similar.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:01 pm
by Moving Sale
Derron wrote:
Moving Sale wrote:
Derron wrote:
And cue the libtard response to be : " Go fuck yourselves "birthers"..it is none of your business"!
Where do you think he was born?
Probably spewed out of your mothers vile cunt right after you....your thought process's and his seem similar.
So you are too chicken or too stupid to have a real take and are going with the 'yo momma' and IKHIASAY. You are one stupid fuck.
Thanks for playing you stupid fucksicle.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:30 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Wolfman wrote:the Governor of Hawaii ... wants to prove he was born in the USA.
You really are this fucking stupid. Gov. Abercrombie is friends with the Obama family and he wants to put you bitter kook right-wing birthers to rest. He wants to release his birth info so you jack-booted thugs stop wasting Hawaii tax dollars calling the government and demanding to see Obama's birth certificate just for your own personal satisfaction.
You seriously need a lead dose to the brain.
HONOLULU — Gov. Neil Abercrombie of Hawaii, who befriended President Obama’s parents when they were university students here, has been in office for less than three weeks. But he is so incensed over “birthers” — the conspiracy theorists who assert that Mr. Obama was born in Kenya and was thus not eligible to become president — that he is seeking ways to change state policy to allow him to release additional proof that the president was born in Honolulu in 1961.
Neil Abercrombie and his wife, Nancie Caraway before the inauguration ceremony on Dec. 6 in Honolulu.
“It’s an insult to his mother and to his father, and I knew his mother and father; they were my friends, and I have an emotional interest in that,” Governor Abercrombie said in a telephone interview late Thursday. “It’s an emotional insult. It is disrespectful to the president; it is disrespectful to the office.”
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:20 pm
by Derron
Moving Sale wrote:
So you are too chicken or too stupid to have a real take and are going with the 'yo momma' and IKHIASAY. You are one stupid fuck.
Thanks for playing you stupid fucksicle.
So is your fucksicle blast related to your other oh so clever fuckpop blast ?
Because if you combine the two words, drop one fuck, you will get fuckpopsicle
Is that the clever and sly smack move you been talking about ? You have a story board where you rearrange all these words to see what your next smack blast will be ?
Fuckin tard...
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:30 pm
by Moving Sale
Derron wrote:
Is that the clever and sly smack move you been talking about ? You have a story board where you rearrange all these words to see what your next smack blast will be ?
Fuckin tard...
Once again you are too stupid or too chicken to respond to the meat of the post and instead try to make hay out of the trimmings. Why do you so that? Are you REALLY too stupid to tell us where you think BHO was born? It's a simple question, a fucking 3rd grader could answer it. Why can't you you stupid felching cumball?
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:40 pm
by mvscal
Even if he was born in Kenya it's too late to do anything about it now. He is the President duly elected and sworn into office. Questions of eligibility need to be resolved as part of the certification process of cadidates.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:04 am
by poptart
mvscal wrote:He is the President duly elected
Tough sell trying to assert that a person is duly elected even though they were not duly eligible. lol
But maybe it's just me.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:15 am
by mvscal
Tough sell? Only to idiots and wingnuts.
He received a majority of the votes of the Electoral College. The vote was certified by Congress. He was sworn into office by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
Got it?
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 8:31 am
by poptart
mvscal wrote:Tough sell? Only to idiots and wingnuts.
lol
If it was found that a sitting president was not even eligible to be on the ballot, would you be in favor of letting that person remain in office?
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:05 pm
by Carson
Only if a fat hog is blowing him and "holding" his cigs for him while he's sitting.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 3:55 pm
by mvscal
poptart wrote:If it was found that a sitting president was not even eligible to be on the ballot, would you be in favor of letting that person remain in office?
The only remedy would be to remove him from office via the impeachment process. But if you birther idiots want to continue making yourselves look complete buffoons....carry on.
Everyone else is rolling their eyes.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:09 pm
by dingus
Yeah, he's back on track like a 'runner' in the Special Olympics who falls down, Charlie Browns, i.e. shoes, glasses, go flying, is sitting there crying but gets put back on track and redressed by the 'officials,' and heads off again to the finish line, only to fall again, and repeat the process. All the while he's being cheered on by the crowd of like 8 people, makes it to the finish line 2 minutes after the race is over-and gets a medal. Yeah, he's back on track like that.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:52 pm
by poptart
mvscal wrote:you birther idiots
I'm curious.
Are you satisfied that Barry was born in Hawaii?
If so, what satisfies you of that?
Interesting that a guy who campaigned HARD on promising that he's have an an administration that would be open and transparent would immediately lock down ALL of his past records as soon as he hit office.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:34 am
by poptart
mvscal wrote:
poptart wrote:If it was found that a sitting president was not even eligible to be on the ballot, would you be in favor of letting that person remain in office?
The only remedy would be to remove him from office via the impeachment process. But if you birther idiots want to continue making yourselves look complete buffoons....carry on.
Everyone else is rolling their eyes.
Try again and answer the question, 'tard.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 12:56 am
by Moving Sale
poptart wrote:
mvscal wrote:you birther idiots
I'm curious.
Are you satisfied that Barry was born in Hawaii?
If so, what satisfies you of that?
I'll field this. A fucking birth certificate is a good start and you can add the newspaper accounts and an eyewitness or 50.
What makes you think he wasn't
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:11 am
by poptart
Moving Sale wrote:I'll field this
1. Try taking a computer print out of your certification of live birth off the internet to do some official business and let me know how it works for you.
2. Same with some newspaper clippings. LMAO
They don't prove that he was born there.
Do you know who put those notices in the newspapers? Do you know what the standard was? Do you think a mother could recognize the benefit of claiming a child was American born?
Again, they don't prove jack shit.
3. 50 Eyewitnesses? Eyewitness to what? Link?
I don't know if Barry was born in Hawaii or not.
What is obvious from his behavior is that he has something that he very desperately wants to keep hidden.
Could be thing(s) which would "just" be very humiliating to him, or ... it could be worse than that.
At any rate, he's a piece of shit.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:29 am
by Moving Sale
poptart wrote: Try taking a computer print out of your certification of live birth off the internet to do some official business and let me know how it works for you.
Try not lying. I used the same type of BC that BHO has shown to the world to get a passport for a friend just last year.
They don't prove that he was born there.
They are evidence that he was.
Do you know who put those notices in the newspapers? Do you know what the standard was? Do you think a mother could recognize the benefit of claiming a child was American born?
So it was some plot hatched up where? When? How did they get them in if they were not in Hawaii?
Again, they don't prove jack shit.
Not to you because you are an idiot.
3. 50 Eyewitnesses? Eyewitness to what? Link?
We will start with the Gov of a Hawaii.
I don't know if Barry was born in Hawaii or not.
So you are just a little shit stirring turd without a backbone.
What is obvious from his behavior is that he has something that he very desperately wants to keep hidden.
How is it obvious? What behavior?
At any rate, he's a piece of shit.
Why? Because you don't like his politics? His skin color? That you are a stupid tard and he isn't? Put up or shut up.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:42 am
by smackaholic
poptart wrote:
mvscal wrote:you birther idiots
I'm curious.
Are you satisfied that Barry was born in Hawaii?
If so, what satisfies you of that?
Interesting that a guy who campaigned HARD on promising that he's have an an administration that would be open and transparent would immediately lock down ALL of his past records as soon as he hit office.
I'm not satisfied that he is, but, I haven't got any sort of conclusive evidence that he wasn't. So chasing after something you can't prove makes you look a fukking moron and gives barry sympathy. He's doing a pretty good yob of KHOA. This birther shit is a distraction from it.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:46 am
by Cuda
Moving Sale wrote: an eyewitness or 50.
Are we talking Obama's mom, or Haywood's mom? That's a lot of people to be gazing at one vag at the same time.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 1:55 am
by Moving Sale
smackaholic wrote:
I'm not satisfied that he is,
Why?
I haven't got any sort of conclusive evidence that he wasn't.
So you are just a fucking jellyfish. Great take. :doh:
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:24 am
by mvscal
poptart wrote:
mvscal wrote:you birther idiots
I'm curious.
Are you satisfied that Barry was born in Hawaii?
Yes. There is no reason to believe that he wasn't.
Interesting that a guy who campaigned HARD on promising that he's have an an administration that would be open and transparent would immediately lock down ALL of his past records as soon as he hit office.
Of course he's a hypocritical sack of lizard shit. The fact that his campaign promises were lies and bullshit doesn't really surprise me.
That is valid criticism.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:27 am
by poptart
Moving Sale wrote:I used the same type of BC that BHO has shown to the world
He posted a certification of live birth on the internet.
You DID NOT take a printed-off-the-interweb copy of a certification of live birth and get a passport with it, you ridiculous asshat.
Newspaper clippings (from 50 years ago) could be shown as evidence that a person was born in a given place, yes.
HOWEVER, to know if the evidence has any BITE, we would need to know MANY circumstances surrounding them.
All we KNOW a newspaper notification of a birth to be is verification that the paper was notified of the birth.
That's it.
It is in no way an OFFICIAL DOCUMENTAION of that birth in that state.
You, as a lawyer, can't see that?
Clown.
What is the governor of Hawaii a witness to?
You said there were 50 witnesses to something.
Oh, you were completely talking out of your ass.
Moving Sale wrote:How is it obvious? What behavior?
Dude, he has locked down EVERY document to his past.
And it would have been quite easy by now to simply produce the long form and settle the matter.
Behavior of guilt.
You, even as an obvious flunky of a lawyer, ought to recognize it.
But then again, no surprise you don't.
Moving Sale wrote:His skin color?
haha
Yep, there it is.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 2:51 pm
by R-Jack
poptart wrote:All we KNOW a newspaper notification of a birth to be is verification that the paper was notified of the birth.
That's it.
It is in no way an OFFICIAL DOCUMENTAION of that birth in that state.
Are you suggesting that Obama's parents phoned an announcement from Kenya just in case he ran for President?
Terrible angle.
Dude, he has locked down EVERY document to his past.
And it would have been quite easy by now to simply produce the long form and settle the matter.
Behavior of guilt.
That's not behavior of guilt. That's not taking the time out to appease a bunch of tinfoil wearing asshats.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 3:17 pm
by smackaholic
Moving Sale wrote:
smackaholic wrote:
I'm not satisfied that he is,
Why?
I haven't got any sort of conclusive evidence that he wasn't.
So you are just a fucking jellyfish. Great take. :doh:
No, not a jellyfish, but I have my doubts. Problem is I have no way to verify these doubts so it's time to move on and stop wasting time worrying about it.
I will say this much, the pic of his birf cert. I saw posted sure the fukk didn't look like it was produced in 1961. Documents such as that from that time period generally had blank spaces where someone typed in the blank area. The one shown looked a whole lot more like it was produced recently on a 'puter and printed on an inkjet printer. Of course, all I have for reference is my birf cert. which is of the same vintage but from Ct.
What I would like to see are other examples of certs from that time frame from honolulu.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:12 pm
by poptart
R-Jack wrote:Are you suggesting that Obama's parents phoned an announcement from Kenya just in case he ran for President?
Terrible angle.
lol
No, that's just YOU attributing a "terrible angle" to me - which I did not (and never would) produce.
I'm saying 50 year old newspaper clippings are not an offical document.
Pretty basic stuff.
Do YOU know who notified the papers of the birth?
Do YOU know the standard those papers had at that time for inclusion of a notice of birth within their papers?
Pretty certain you don't.
R-Jack wrote:That's not behavior of guilt. That's not taking the time out to appease a bunch of tinfoil wearing asshats.
Tinfoil asshat?
No, it's just me thinking that we ought to have someone be proven to be a legitimately eligible candidate before they sit in charge of the most powerful military in the history of the world.
Things like that seem like common sense to me.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:17 pm
by poptart
smackaholic wrote:I will say this much, the pic of his birf cert. I saw posted sure the fukk didn't look like it was produced in 1961.
Maybe that's because what you saw wasn't produced in 1961.
And nobody from Team Obama is trying to say that it was.
What they posted on the internet was admittedly computer generated in 2007.
Place an order for a certification of live birth - and you get something looking similar to what we saw on the internet - even if you were born in 1961.
Now if Barry sacked up and produced his long form birth certificate, then yeah, it would look like it came from ... 1961.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:09 pm
by OCmike
poptart wrote:
Maybe that's because what you saw wasn't produced in 1961.
And nobody from Team Obama is trying to say that it was.
What they posted on the internet was admittedly computer generated in 2007.
Now if Barry sacked up and produced his long form birth certificate, then yeah, it would look like it came from ... 1961.
Why would he do that? It wouldn't end the debate, it would just start an all new one about the document's authenticity and probably speculation on him using the CIA create a passable fake.
There are plenty of legit, tangible, proveablereasons to dislike Obama. Pick one and move on.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:36 am
by poptart
Mike, you really ought to think through your take, imo.
Do you really excuse Barry for not showing his long form birth certificate on the basis that, well, if he did so, people would just think it's a fake?
That is seriously funny.
Barry: I'm going to spend huge sums of money fighting NOT to release the form because if I do release it, people will just think it's fake.
lol
Well, NOW, maybe some would.
I mean, the guy has stonewalled for 3 years - so yeah, people might still be a bit skeptical of what is shown.
If this asshat was any kind of leader at all he would have said, "What, 20% of the people I lead think I may not be eligible? *Snaps fingers* (points to Gibbs). Robert, get on this immediately. Get the long form and let's end this thing now."
Instead, he makes the remarkably 'tardish comment that he can't spend all his time with his birth certificate plastered on his forehead[/elvis].
His behavior is not rational, sorry.
Re: OBAMA: back on track
Posted: Sat Jan 01, 2011 4:15 pm
by smackaholic
Last time I got a copy of my BC it was an exact copy of the one filed in city hall. Seems to me this should still be the case as a computer generated one is more easily forged.