T1B

2-3-1

The Seer wrote:




2-3-1

I'll go with 3,2,1...... blast off!

So should I be doing a Chris Hansen reset or a Winger reset?

Miss Oregon is 2nd from left, Miss Kansas on the right.

Sorry Dins, looks like your girl was on an all fish diet, gimme' the cornfed babes everytime.

remember when the miss america pageant used to be big?

there is a way back to it being must see TV.

there needs to be a pron contest added.

R-Jack wrote:So should I be doing a Chris Hansen reset or a Winger reset?

A Chris Hansen/Winger blast from a pedophile.

Pron 's

Moving Sale wrote:

R-Jack wrote:So should I be doing a Chris Hansen reset or a Winger reset?

A Chris Hansen/Winger blast from a pedophile.

Oh yeah, about that.........You get around to finding that post or reset about that thing you keep obsessing over?

It's OK. Take your time.

R-Jack wrote:You get around to finding that post or reset about that thing you keep obsessing over?

It's OK. Take your time.

Oh I see I need to cite the post before I drop the smack. That rule would then apply to you am I right?

R-Jack wrote:Funny,

When I get stopped by the cops, I'm driving but the 13 year old is drunk.

~Diego~

R-Jack wrote: The hard part if figuring why the rest of the shitsucking planet creams themselves like Diego at a Justin Beiber concert over it.

Well? Take your time indeed you horrid child molesting cumdish.

What is it with you and the child molester stuff? :?

Face it you are not very smart.

Moving Sale wrote:Oh I see I need to cite the post before I drop the smack.

Or a collaborating witness. You have neither ‘the evidence’ nor anyone to back your shit take. Which is why you look like an incompetent fucking buffoon. Again.

You are short.
Diego is a pedo.
I like $105 Polo shirts.

Whether these statements are true or not is totally irrelevant. They have become smackalicious board 'facts.' Why must you suck at this so badly?

Moving Bowels wrote:Face it you are not very smart.

Your self analysis and then verbalizing it is really going full bore here..keep going...

Derron wrote:

Moving Bowels wrote:Face it you are not very smart.

Your self analysis and then verbalizing it is really going full bore here..keep going...

Jesus Christ, Dorron. Move to Kansas City, then kill yourself.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Or a collaborating witness.

Those are your rules. Care to elaborate where you got them? Care to elaborate as to why collaboration is needed? And just to be clear is it only one witness or are more required? Is cross examination of the witness allowed? Is the bias of the witness taken into account? Care to do R-Jack's work for him and post the proof he says is needed for him to go pedosmack on someone? Care to pull your head out of your ass for one single second?

Whether these statements are true or not is totally irrelevant.

Then why is a witness needed?

How dumb are you?

Moving Sale wrote:Care to elaborate as to why collaboration is needed?

Its necessity is conditional. The word collaborate was contained within a neither/nor statement. Do you practice being stupid or do you fall out of bed this way?

I would have thought an alleged lawyer would have corrected the use of "collaborate" when the word you were looking for was "corroborate."


Might be time for multiple ejects here.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: Its necessity is conditional.

Yes I know. Care to show anywhere where I said otherwise? Care to show where I even intimated it?

According to you one must cite the post or have a witness to the post. My question since you are too stupid to get it the first time is, why is the witness needed? There already is one witness, that being the person that posted the smack. Why is the second witness needed? All crimes save for treason require one witness. Why do you need two in this case?

Do you practice being stupid or do you fall out of bed this way?

Why did you not answer any of the other questions? (Not that you answered why corroboration is needed.)

Where did you get these "rules?"
Is it just the one witness?
Will any "witness" do?
Is bias taken into account?
Will you be helping R-Jackmeofflittlegirl out with the proof he says he needs?

Come on smart guy step up to the plate.

Dinsdale wrote:I would have thought an alleged lawyer would have corrected the use of "collaborate" when the word you were looking for was "corroborate."

I'm fairly certain it is part of the handler's way of removing the scent from his trail...

Dinsdale wrote:I would have thought an alleged lawyer would have corrected the use of "collaborate" when the word you were looking for was "corroborate."


Might be time for multiple ejects here.

He said collaboration was needed. I asked him why collaboration was needed. I would still like to know why collaboration is needed. Not sure how that makes me an alleged lawyer.

Moving Sale wrote:There already is one witness, that being the person that posted the smack

And what, exactly, did you witness? Did you have a clear view of this event or was your view obstructed? Were you wearing your glasses? Did you remember to wipe them off after the midget bukkake?

Leave it to a lawyer (alleged) to try to make a legal argument for effective smack.

Let me see if I can 'splain to you what Ucunt is saying.

Simply saying R-jack is a ped, over....and over....and over doesn't make it effective smack. Effective smack would be taking something R-jack may have said and running with it. I assume that is how Diego got tagged with it.

So, feel free to continue with your really fukking awful attempts at it. It kind of identifies you and has become a source of smack itself.

Sudden Sam wrote:I was about to bring that up

You were about to bring up spelling smack? Riveting. When you're mashing out 60 WPM, sometimes then becomes than. Their becomes they're. Corroborate becomes collaborate. Whatever.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: When you're mashing out 60 WPM,

Wow. Everything you do is hardcore, isn't it?

Do you spell out motivational phrases like "Losing is for wimps!" on your fridge with magnetic letters too?

Look, just tear a phone book in half and call it a night.

Martyred wrote:Everything you do is hardcore, isn't it?

Typing a whole 60 WPM is not really hardcore. I bet you could do it too... after your hands are freed up from jacking off to naked pictures of King George VI, that is.

Martyred wrote: Look, just tear a phone book in half and call it a night.

Moving Sale wrote:I would still like to know why collaboration is needed.

Not exactly corraboration (or collaboration or clobbernation or whatever you want to call it) but more like clarification.

Moving Sale wrote:

Mace wrote:

Oh, you really believe that R-Jack is a pedophile?

You have read his posts right?

Like which post? Since you are attributing your stalk job to something I said, instead of admitting that you're making shit up out of thin air, you should be able to point it out. You obviously don't have a problem finding other posts of mine, but this smoking gun seems to elude you for some reason.

You can deflect and spin all you want. It doesn't change the fact that you cited my posts as the source and have failed to back it up.

Well............

Dear Mr. R-Jack

TVO drops in here periodically and farts a steaming pile in every thread he can reach... why would you ever feel the need to account yourself to this unflushed turd?

Moving Sale wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:I would have thought an alleged lawyer would have corrected the use of "collaborate" when the word you were looking for was "corroborate."


Might be time for multiple ejects here.

He said collaboration was needed. I asked him why collaboration was needed. I would still like to know why collaboration is needed. Not sure how that makes me an alleged lawyer.

I'll bet you're a blast at parties.

R-Jack wrote:You obviously don't have a problem finding other posts of mine, but this smoking gun seems to elude you for some reason.

The ability to use your brain seems to elude you. Go a few posts up. Read what I said. Ask somebody with an IQ of 90 or greater what it means and then get back to me you vile pedophilic fuckpillow.

props to the Huskers for failing their way out of the Big12