T1B

Tea partiers say defense in mix for budget cuts

"House Republican leaders specifically exempted defense, homeland security and veterans' programs from spending cuts in their party's "Pledge to America" campaign manifesto last fall. But the House's new majority leader, Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., has said defense programs could join others on the cutting board."


Here's your chance, Democrats, to create a schism between astro-turfing GOP carpet-baggers and the original 'baggers, the Ron Paul, "Eliminate-The-Fed", tri-corn hat wearing, chem-trail fearing, screwballs.

We should cut defense. Mostly by getting the fukk out of Afghanistan.

We have nothing to gain there. Leave them to their poppy growing and goat fukking.

Of course the libtards are stuck with supporting the Afghan debacle because they spent years using it as a reason we should not be in Iraq.

Speaking of Iraq, I wonder how much we are being repaid these days? I mean those fukkers we liberated are getting nearly 100 bucks a barrel. Surely some of that windfall is finding it's way into the US treasury, i'nit?

smackaholic wrote: Of course the libtards are stuck with supporting the Afghan debacle because...

...they are just as blood-thirsty imperialists as the Republicans.

Two wings of the same party.

They'll let you quibble all you like about fags in the military and selfish tax cuts, but hegemony rolls on.

This is why you need "gold plated" weapons systems like nuclear submarines and next-generation fighters...



Remeber, it's welfare programs, not the Pentagon's budget bankrupting your country...

...not the Pentagon's budget bankrupting your country...

...not the Pentagon's budget bankrupting your country...

...not the Pentagon's budget bankrupting your country...

...and more money for the Department Of Fatherland Security.

Because you can't be trusted.

Go Jets! Packers!

I am shaking with RAGE right now!!!! Wait. Who are the people with guns?

~KFC Paul

R-Jack wrote:
I am shaking with RAGE right now!!!! Wait. Who are the people with guns?

~KFC Paul

~tasteful and concise~

yet another reason to buy 'mer uh can. when was the last time you saw a load of rpg equipped towel heads in the back of an F-150?

smackaholic wrote:when was the last time you saw a load of rpg equipped towel heads in the back of an F-150?

A Ford?

They're insane, jihadist fundamentalists, not morons.

Even an F-150 would fall to pieces on those mountain paths.

Way to go, UAW!

smackaholic wrote:yet another reason to buy 'mer uh can. when was the last time you saw a load of rpg equipped towel heads in the back of an F-150?

We should outsource the F-150 assembly plants to China in an effort to overcome Toyota's market share in Ragland. This will surely boost the American economy and have minimal effect on the demand for crude oil despite the need to ship them back to America for sale to the same cretins whose jobs we have eliminated. Brilliant!

Sincerely,

Corporate greed and the politicians in their pockets

On second thought, if the U.S. military supplied the Taliban with F-150's, special forces units could follow the trail of leaking oil back to their hideouts.

See? I just solved the "War On Terror" for you guys.

Marty = true friend

Martyred wrote:

Funny stuff, but what's a cell phone tower doing in Rugistan?

Nice burkha v technology pic.

That's not a cell phone tower, that's Radio Free Uzbekistan.

she's showing almost half her shin!!!

stone the temptress whore.

smackaholic wrote:Of course the libtards are stuck with supporting the Afghan debacle because they spent years using it as a reason we should not be in Iraq.

That might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life. Props, suckaholic.

smackaholic wrote: stone the temptress whore.

You gotta admit...she's got a great "ass"!

Screw_Michigan wrote:

smackaholic wrote:Of course the libtards are stuck with supporting the Afghan debacle because they spent years using it as a reason we should not be in Iraq.

That might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life. Props, suckaholic.

oh, I don't know... there's some stiff competition today.

Dumb4ever wrote:We should outsource the F-150 assembly plants to China in an effort to overcome Toyota's market share in Ragland. This will surely boost the American economy and have minimal effect on the demand for crude oil despite the need to ship them back to America for sale to the same cretins whose jobs we have eliminated.

Martyred wrote:

smackaholic wrote: stone the temptress whore.

You gotta admit...she's got a great "ass"!

We always thought you were more of a sheep guy.

I saw a guy walk into Toys R Us last week wearing a trench coat.

I immediately thought of Diego.

[i]Merdérouge[/i] wrote:

So what's your point, Komrade?

You DO realize that the United States Congress is Constitutionally mandated to fund the protection of our Republic, and that it is a Free Canada that allows you to post your platitudes, correct?

Your country exists at our Benevolence, tovarisch.

The Continental Missile Shield out front shoulda told ya. Paid for, might I add, by hard-working, tax-payin' 'mericans.

Martyred wrote:I saw a guy walk into Toys R Us last week wearing a trench coat.

I immediately thought of Diego.

WTF were you doing in a Toys R Us in the first place?

...Probably buying toys for the Fixer's girlfriend.

Cheers, Truman.

The pick-up traveling, mountain nomads would be half way across the Yukon by now.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

Martyred wrote:I saw a guy walk into Toys R Us last week wearing a trench coat.

I immediately thought of Diego.

WTF were you doing in a Toys R Us in the first place?

I was at the Pretzel Shack on the other side of the concourse. I didn't say I was in the Toys R Us, smart ass...

Truman wrote: You DO realize that the United States Congress is Constitutionally mandated to fund the protection of our Republic, and that it is a Free Canada that allows you to post your platitudes, correct?

I know Truman...all your freedoms...all your hopes, dreams and aspirations emanate from the government.
You've made that abundantly clear in the past.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

smackaholic wrote:Of course the libtards are stuck with supporting the Afghan debacle because they spent years using it as a reason we should not be in Iraq.

That might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life. Props, suckaholic.

are you going to deny that from the moment the shrub started talking about taking sadaam out, the libs weren't crying that we were being distracted from the real target, afghanistan?

smackaholic wrote:
are you going to deny that from the moment the shrub started talking about taking sadaam out, the libs weren't crying that we were being distracted from the real target, afghanistan?

Go ahead and list the Democrats that voted against the war.

Go ahead...

Dr_Phibes wrote:

Die. Just die already.

Martyred wrote:

Truman wrote: You DO realize that the United States Congress is Constitutionally mandated to fund the protection of our Republic, and that it is a Free Canada that allows you to post your platitudes, correct?

I know Truman...all your freedoms...all your hopes, dreams and aspirations emanate from the government.
You've made that abundantly clear in the past.

:brad:

Dern. Hatches barrened, diesels trimmed, and a full week's worth of fuel. Now what in the hell am I supposed to do with all this friggin' chum?!

He's a tricky one, that ichthy-freak [/the Deacon]

BSmack wrote:

Dr_Phibes wrote:

Die. Just die already.

I can't, Truman is protecting me.

Dear Leader says call the cops, Pack is gonna rob you.

Здравствуйте, Komrade Doktor!

So how IS my favorite Nomenklatura? Nice to see you in fine fettle these days. Here's hoping for a successful 2011 harvest down at Kollectiv #3, thus sparing you the usual denunciation before the Ministry of Agriculture, boychik...

Dr_Phibes wrote: Dear Leader says call the cops, Jets are gonna rob you.

Unless it's a sexual assault competition. Then I would rest my starters, to avoid injury and possible humiliation at the groping hands of Rapistburger.

Martyred wrote: Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., has said defense programs could join others on the cutting board."

Of course he is 100% correct. There's plenty of fat to trim in the Defense Dept. just like every other department in the federal government. In fact we ought to start defunding some of the completely.

War Wagon wrote:

Screw_Michigan wrote:

smackaholic wrote:Of course the libtards are stuck with supporting the Afghan debacle because they spent years using it as a reason we should not be in Iraq.

That might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my life. Props, suckaholic.

oh, I don't know... there's some stiff competition today.

Dumb4ever wrote:We should outsource the F-150 assembly plants to China in an effort to overcome Toyota's market share in Ragland. This will surely boost the American economy and have minimal effect on the demand for crude oil despite the need to ship them back to America for sale to the same cretins whose jobs we have eliminated.

What's the matter Wags? That shit too real? Oh that's right....your job depends on lost American jobs. Why don't you get on board with the home team one time?

Papa Willie wrote:

smackaholic wrote:We should cut defense. Mostly by getting the fukk out of Afghanistan.

We have nothing to gain there. Leave them to their poppy growing and goat fukking.

Of course the libtards are stuck with supporting the Afghan debacle because they spent years using it as a reason we should not be in Iraq.

Speaking of Iraq, I wonder how much we are being repaid these days? I mean those fukkers we liberated are getting nearly 100 bucks a barrel. Surely some of that windfall is finding it's way into the US treasury, i'nit?

Don't forget about the 50,000 "advisors" we still have in Iraq.

I have no problem with us being in Iraq. Unlike Afghanistan, it is a rich country in a geographically important area to us. Afghanistan is a central asia wasteland. Why do we need to be there? To keep an eye on those crazy Uzbeks?

To continue the War on Drugs.