T1B

This is unbelievable!

Sin,
The NFL Forum a few days ago

I like "developed" women. 17 y/o's are barely developed. But whatever.

Sanchez really isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer, is he? I don't really have an issue with the age difference in general, but, for chrissakes, there's gotta be boatloads of ridiculously hot 23 year olds in the NYC area just lined up for him.

Does anyone have any pics of this little girl?

In Sanchez's old hood, isn't a childless 17 yo considered an old maid?

Who hasn't jerked off to Jan Brady?

Sirfindafold wrote:Who hasn't jerked off to Jan Brady?

Rack.

How's the retirement been going? Obviously not very well.

pron wrote:

meh.

cute enough, i guess.

but cute enough ain't worth all the baggage that comes with being labeled a perv.

of course, i 'spose the jury may still be out till we get some pics with a better look at her bod.

smackaholic wrote:

but cute enough ain't worth all the baggage that comes with being labeled a perv.

I am sure Sanchez was all about that as the bitch took load after load in her pie hole. Nothing says skank like bragging about it on you FB page.

Derron wrote:Nothing says skank like bragging about it on you FB page.

That just made this chick's life. Her "status" is through the roof. Guys wanting to get with her better be NFL jocks or else they aren't getting a whiff.

y'know scott, for an alleged financial guru, you are really not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

i never said it should be illegal for sanchez to pound the shit out of that skank. just said it wasn't particularly wise, especially since she really doesn't appear to be all that anyhoo. i then added that some more revealing shots might sway my opinion.

KC Scott wrote:14-15 yr. old girls are old enough for consent

I don't see why not. They are sexually mature and know whether or not they want squat on a cock.
What is your problem with biology?

KC Scott wrote:Regardless of how "good" you think your daughter is, if some 20 something dude started firing hard on her and made her feel all special then knocked her ass up, you'd lose your shit -

Ah, no. She is most definitely her own person and any 20 something that came on to her would get a raised eyebrow at best and a faceful of pepperspray at worst.

Coercion is the term you used.

Coercion is rape...period. And, no, talking a chick up is not coercion.

KC Scott wrote:I'm sure there's a lot of unexpected grandpa that felt that exact same way

Are you? You have a 15 year old daughter? No? Then shut the fuck up. I know mine, you don't. Maybe you might think you might know a little bit about me and that's probably fair. I'll just say that my girl takes after me with a...somewhat jaundiced view of humanity in general. I would almost pity the 30 year old greaseball who tried to roll up on her with his slick pick up routine. It would be great comedy. She's almost as cutting as I am.

It's not the 30 year old you need to worry about. It's the 16 or 17 year old.

Coercion (pronounced /koʊˈɜrʃən/) is the practice of forcing another party to behave in an involuntary manner (whether through action or inaction) by use of threats,or rewards intimidation or some other form of pressure or force

Or put another way it's manipulation.

Uh, no. It is the use of threats, rewards or intimidation not a clever pick up line.

14-15 yr. old girls aren't mature enough to understand 20 something dudes telling them if they loved hem they'd put out

Actually they are. The ones that are dumb enough to fall for that at 15 will still be falling for it at 35.

Scott wrote:14-15 yr. old girls aren't mature enough to understand 20 something dudes telling them if they loved hem they'd put out

Surely true in some cases.

In many other cases, I'm sure, the 14-15 yr old girls are more mature than the average 20-something dude.

Guys can be pitifully immature, even at advanced ages.