I’ve worn a large my whole adult life. Luckily they haven’t fucked with those, just the XXLs.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:25 pm
by BSmack
Jsc810 wrote:Where is Papa Willie? He'll understand.
And I'll have you know that I still am within 10 pounds of my college playing weight. OK, so the weight now is in different places and doesn't look the same, but still. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
What position did you play in college? Left Hindenberg?
Yea, I know I'm not exactly pettite. But you're the dumbfuck that brought this up.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:29 pm
by Goober McTuber
Jsc810 wrote:Where is Papa Willie? He'll understand.
Jsc810 wrote:Where is Papa Willie? He'll understand.
And I'll have you know that I still am within 10 pounds of my college playing weight. OK, so the weight now is in different places and doesn't look the same, but still. That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
I weigh in at my college playing weight too but, as you said, the weight has shifted and I no longer have the muscle in my upper body that I once had. But I've gone from a large in golf/polo shirts to a medium. I've noticed a bigger change in my waist where I used to wear a 30" or 31" and now wear a 33" or 34".
It's been my experience that they're making roomier cuts in shirts because America is getting fatter...so that a large now is what used to be an XL, but you seem to be going the other direction with your sizing.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:40 pm
by R-Jack
Jsc810 wrote:I played goalie in lacrosse,
No shit.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 3:42 pm
by Mace
R-Jack wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:I played goalie in lacrosse,
No shit.
Now that's what an all-american goalie looks like.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:17 pm
by Mace
According to your chart, I need to lose 5 pounds to be in the "normal" range...which is probably true, but the chart doesn't factor in age which, according to my doctor, means you should put on a little extra weight as you grow older.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:17 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
That chart is flawed. 6'2" and 145 is... normal? In RACK FU's world, maybe.
Is there a below 4'2" midget/dwarf scale? I don't see how Zyclone and Moving Sale can measure themselves here.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:18 pm
by Dinsdale
R-Jack wrote:Right............it's them.
You know what else has changed over the last decade or two?
The sun puts out a lot more UV radiation than it used to.
That's the only explanation I can come up with why my scalp gets sunburned if I go outside without a hat... it didn't used to do that.
And according to that stupid chart, I'm a few pounds from being overweight.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 4:24 pm
by Mace
Dinsdale wrote:
R-Jack wrote:Right............it's them.
You know what else has changed over the last decade or two?
The sun puts out a lot more UV radiation than it used to.
That's the only explanation I can come up with why my scalp gets sunburned if I go outside without a hat... it didn't used to do that.
And according to that stupid chart, I'm a few pounds from being overweight.
You know, I once thought the same thing because me and my like-aged friends all have the same problem as you. I realized the problem might be something else when my son's scalp didn't burn. Maybe those rays discriminate and we can file an age discrimination suit or something.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:21 pm
by Killian
Jsc810 wrote:
Nice tits, JSC. Or are you the guy wearing the rotary club banner?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:26 pm
by R-Jack
How many of Mace's wives went Brazilian to make that giant suit?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:44 pm
by Derron
Dinsdale wrote:
That's the only explanation I can come up with why my scalp gets sunburned if I go outside without a hat... it didn't used to do that.
That is because you ain't got any fuckin hair.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:03 pm
by Mace
Ya think? :)
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:22 pm
by smackaholic
Jsc810 wrote:I'm the one wearing a tie.
and it's purple.
that figures
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:27 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
What the fuck is that slop on the left, Chip?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:29 pm
by smackaholic
those weight charts are a joke. according to them, i was a little fat in high school when i was swimming every day. now, well, the chart needs a little stretching to the right. but, if i was in good shape, which is prolly about 195-200, it says i'm still fat. i think part of it is that i am short legged or long torsoed or what ever you want to call it.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:30 pm
by smackaholic
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:What the fuck is that slop on the left, Chip?
looks like what you get after the all you can eat chinese buffet followed by tequila abuse.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:42 pm
by Derron
smackaholic wrote:those weight charts are a joke. according to them, i was a little fat in high school when i was swimming every day. now, well, the chart needs a little stretching to the right. but, if i was in good shape, which is prolly about 195-200, it says i'm still fat. i think part of it is that i am short legged or long torsoed or what ever you want to call it.
Word. The chart showed me normal at 6'1" and 155 when I was sick with ulcerative colitis. I was walking death in those days. No muscle mass,very poor condition, bad health all around.
And now that chart says I am over weight at 196. I don't think so. Now five years ago at 252, that was a bit much.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:46 pm
by Screw_Michigan
How the hell is JSC being honored for anything?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:48 pm
by Derron
Jsc810 wrote:Someone started to say that eating cajun food might have something to do with the way clothes fit but LALALALALA I CAN"T HEAR YOU LALALALALALA.
So that is the swill they feed you at your Rotary meetings ?
If so you need a new venue. My Rotary does substantially better than that garbage. And our eye candy is also a lot better than that hog you are standing next to.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:48 pm
by jiminphilly
Jsc810 wrote:
Go ahead and put some South in your mouth. :)
Keep your gay tendencies to yourself.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:51 pm
by Derron
Jsc810 wrote:
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:What the fuck is that slop on the left, Chip?
Slop? That is crawfish etouffee, which is outstanding.
What is even more outstanding is that styro foam dish it is served in. Way to nail the presentation.
Go ahead and put some South in your mouth. :)
If you are calling out Diego the pedo..you mean North right ?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:53 pm
by Derron
Jsc810 wrote:
You know there is a wytching opportunity for someone here don't you ?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:13 pm
by Mace
Jsc810 wrote:I'm going to assume that you don't have access to crawfish,
We have access here in Iowa (probably a smaller crawfish though) but we don't eat them. They're pretty good for fish bait though.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:31 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Jsc810 wrote:I'm going to assume that you don't have access to crawfish, but you should be able to get some shrimp.
Not a big seafood fan... I'll pass.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:33 pm
by Derron
Mace wrote: They're pretty good for fish bait though.
Exactly. I have about 3 pounds of them all boraxed in the freezer..great steelhead bait.
You eat bait. I use bait to catch nice fish like these, and then I eat them.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:36 pm
by BSmack
Derron wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:
You know there is a wytching opportunity for someone here don't you ?
Just one?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:06 am
by smackaholic
Derron wrote:
Mace wrote: They're pretty good for fish bait though.
Exactly. I have about 3 pounds of them all boraxed in the freezer..great steelhead bait.
You eat bait. I use bait to catch nice fish like these, and then I eat them.
what ^^^^^ said.
we have crayfish too in the U&R. Used to spend hours at summer camp catching the damn things for fun. It never occured to me that one could catch enough of the goddamn things to make a meal out of, but, i guess if you got some time on your hands and you're dirt fukking poor, you'll take your protein wherever you can get it.
gonna be in gulfport, ms the next few weeks. maybe i'll give them a try.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:16 am
by smackaholic
so, what other types of bait do you fukkers eat? can i get night crawler jumbalaya?
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:34 am
by Mace
Nice wytch job, 88.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 12:52 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
smackaholic wrote:i think part of it is that i am short legged or long torsoed or what ever you want to call it.
Maybe, but I probably got you beat on that.
6'1" with a 32-inch inseam. Essentially, I'm about 5'8" from the waist down and about 6'6" from the waist up.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 1:37 pm
by L45B
Terry in Crapchester wrote:6'1" with a 32-inch inseam.
You should cross out the 32 and write in a 31.
/s/
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:31 pm
by Mikey
@ 88
Jeez, I guess all the ceramic plates, etc. in Loosiana got lost in Katrina. Hope y'all got a lot of landfill space to fill.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 2:44 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Jsc810 wrote:
Looks like turds to me.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 4:40 pm
by smackaholic
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
smackaholic wrote:i think part of it is that i am short legged or long torsoed or what ever you want to call it.
Maybe, but I probably got you beat on that.
6'1" with a 32-inch inseam. Essentially, I'm about 5'8" from the waist down and about 6'6" from the waist up.
pretty close. i'm about 6' with a 31 inseam give or take. most of my pants are 32, but i have a few 30s but they aer a tad high waterish.
Re: they don't make clothes the way they used to
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:18 pm
by Dinsdale
Derron wrote:
Mace wrote: They're pretty good for fish bait though.
Exactly. I have about 3 pounds of them all boraxed in the freezer..great steelhead bait.
You eat bait. I use bait to catch nice fish like these, and then I eat them.
If I remember correctly from an article I read recently, Louisiana is the crawdad capital of the world, many times over.
Something like 95%+ of the US commercial harvest, and some crazy numer... like 60% of all crawfish consumed in the world are consumed in Louisiana.
And with much embarrassment, I guess the rest of the commercial harvest in the USA, as small as it is... comes from my "neck" of the woods. One of the major crawdad "fisheries" being not too far down the road from me (like really close).
But I'm with derron -- shit is bait. Use it to catch nice steelies -- either of the ones in derron's pics being great examples, the hen on the bottom being a extra-nice one. Let me guess -- late-winter broodstocker from the Wilson? That's gotta be a 15-16# beast.