...there had been at least one witness who said the man appeared to have gotten into a three-point stance, "like a football player," yelled "Hike!" and charged the window, which he estimated was an inch thick and double-paned.
Wrong playcall, methinks. By the way, what is a "Further concert"...?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:32 pm
by Tom In VA
Further is ... "a band that includes two former members of the Grateful Dead."
My hunch is he was dosed and forgot where he was.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:37 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
3 yards and a pool of blood.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:43 pm
by Tom In VA
He's Gone
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:51 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Shoulda taken a knee.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:13 pm
by PSUFAN
He was just going further.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:21 pm
by Moving Sale
PSUFAN wrote: By the way, what is a "Further concert"...?
So what you are saying is that you are dumber than Tom? That is a mighty low bar to slither under you mentally challenged fucktard.
Tom In VA wrote:Further is ... "a band that includes two former members of the Grateful Dead."
My hunch is he was dosed and forgot where he was.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:51 pm
by PSUFAN
I definitely profess ignorance about "Further", though that may cost me in your estimation, little guy.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 6:52 pm
by Atomic Punk
Just wanting to see what my new addition to my sig looks like
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:05 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
MGblOw
Clever word play, bro. Did you need a hand with all that BODE?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:29 pm
by Atomic Punk
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
MGblOw
Clever word play, bro. Did you need a hand with all that BODE?
How many years have I referred to you that way? Since this board started? Are you just catching on now? BTW, I've noticed a serious increase in ankle biting from your self-inflated boring ass as of late. How come you don't T.R.O.T.S. your unfunny self?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:32 pm
by R-Jack
How is responding to you bringing his name up ankle biting? :?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:36 pm
by Atomic Punk
Look at his recent responses in various threads to me. Oh, and the recent thread title with AP in it. You don't have to defend him because you are a m0d. He's just a self-absorbed... nothing.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:50 pm
by R-Jack
Once again, responding to..........
Atomic Punk wrote:pictured: l - r
Sincerely,
The dumb tedious and boring twat --> MGblOw
Atomic Punk wrote:How about no more shit trolls? R-Jackoff, MGblOws and a few others in the "know" have a reach-around party going on. Most of us have been on the legit boards for over 10 years. How about exposing trolls publicly or disallow them?
&
Atomic Punk wrote:An MG0 troll is possibly the worst effort in existence. This is an example why this board is dying.
.........is not akle biting you stupid gender bender.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:51 pm
by Cuda
PSUFAN wrote:I definitely profess ignorance about "Further", though that may cost me in your estimation, little guy.
oh, my...
at you, not with you
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:02 pm
by Atomic Punk
R-Jacked is too lazy and/or stupid to see why I've responded to MGblOw in the 1st place. :shocking: Do your elephant walk, reach back upon each other and go back into your box.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:18 pm
by BSmack
PSUFAN wrote:I definitely profess ignorance about "Further", though that may cost me in your estimation, little guy.
The bus came by and I got on
That's when it all began
There was cowboy Neal
At the wheel
Of a bus to never-ever land.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:54 pm
by R-Jack
Atomic Punk wrote:R-Jacked is too lazy and/or stupid to see why I've responded to MGblOw in the 1st place.
The who, what, when, why and how is fucking irrelevent. the fact of the matter is that you are not the one responding. You are the one instigating, yet calling out someone else for ankle biting. It's not my fault that you are too much of a mind-numbingly stupid hermaphrodite to get that through your home-filtered vodka infused skull. If you can't figure this out KYOA yourself, that's on you AP Lee Curtis.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:28 am
by Atomic Punk
R-Jack wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:R-Jacked is too lazy and/or stupid to see why I've responded to MGblOw in the 1st place.
You are the one instigating, yet calling out someone else for ankle biting.
You are purposefully being dishonest dipshit. Look at Marty's Home Improvement thread. On the 2nd page, did I instigate anything with MGbl0w? Do you see me referring to him/her in any way? How about the Title thread MGbl0w started with me as a reference in the subject title. Did I instigate that? Take your time horse fucker.
Tell you what tard, just because you are a m0d and you are intentionally giving MGbl0w the best head with the audible slurping sounds that is making DiS jealous while he aspiring to be better at it than yourself... quit while you are behind.
You are a fucking jerkoff and a joke. Turn your keys in for being stupid.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:17 am
by BSmack
Atomic Punk wrote:On the 2nd page, did I instigate anything with MGbl0w? Do you see me referring to him/her in any way? How about the Title thread MGbl0w started with me as a reference in the subject title. Did I instigate that?
You have got to be kidding me. Get help dude.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 6:54 am
by Atomic Punk
BeenSmacked wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:On the 2nd page, did I instigate anything with MGbl0w? Do you see me referring to him/her in any way? How about the Title thread MGbl0w started with me as a reference in the subject title. Did I instigate that?
You have got to be kidding me. Get help dude.
No, not kidding you. Are you the "lap it up" dog? Let me go respond to your other response to me in another thread. I'm guessing your PMS box is getting full by now by anxious donors.
I wish you well tomorrow. Don't laugh, cough, or be tempted to say anything as you take your weekly mouthful to the sperm donor facility. Many lesbians are awaiting your weekly donation.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 12:52 pm
by BSmack
Atomic Punk wrote:
BeenSmacked wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:On the 2nd page, did I instigate anything with MGbl0w? Do you see me referring to him/her in any way? How about the Title thread MGbl0w started with me as a reference in the subject title. Did I instigate that?
You have got to be kidding me. Get help dude.
No, not kidding you. Are you the "lap it up" dog? Let me go respond to your other response to me in another thread. I'm guessing your PMS box is getting full by now by anxious donors.
I wish you well tomorrow. Don't laugh, cough, or be tempted to say anything as you take your weekly mouthful to the sperm donor facility. Many lesbians are awaiting your weekly donation.
I liked you better when you said my wife was fat and addicted to black cock. Now you're really pathetic.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:14 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
This guy addresses me in this thread unprovoked... but I'm "ankle biting" him.
Awesome.
Don't worry, Disgruntled Retail Guy, I'm sure you'll soon have your chance to "get over" on some unsuspecting housewife in the paint aisle. Maybe you can switch out her paint for primer at the last second. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAA! That'll show her!!
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 4:56 pm
by Dinsdale
BSmack wrote:
Came pretty close to buying that sucker.
After KK died, it was discovered under a huge patch of blackberries in Eugene (probably took a whole buncha work just to get it out).
But, me and my buddy were just a hair too late. What a piece of history that would have been to own.
R-Jack wrote:AP Lee Curtis.
Nice.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:13 pm
by Atomic Punk
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:This guy addresses me in this thread unprovoked... but I'm "ankle biting" him.
Awesome.
Don't worry, Disgruntled Retail Guy, I'm sure you'll soon have your chance to "get over" on some unsuspecting housewife in the paint aisle. Maybe you can switch out her paint for primer at the last second. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAAA! That'll show her!!
Hey dumbfuck... Scroll up and read where this started. I believe I was making fun of TV0, then YOU chimed in like the weak pasty white bitch you are. You and R-Jacked have keys to this board? You 2 are some of the dumbest mother fuckers imaginable. I mean, there is total dishonesty from you losers when you are challenged.
Tell me, do you well-known homosexuals have one of those hidden chat "powder" rooms to talk to each other in private? I'll bet you do.
BTW, pasty Bl0w... I haven't worked in retail for a year but remember most of what I've learned from the contractors that actually know what they are doing.
You know what's funny MGbl0w? You are attempting to smack me for working retail when the guy sucking and gulping your 2 incher when you are on Cialis... R-Jacked works in retail as he has nowhere else to go. You've just insulted one of your m0ds.
Now twat lips, what else are you going to lie about?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 5:56 pm
by Cuda
l to r: AP, Auntie MGBl0w
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 7:17 pm
by Imus
Atomic Punk wrote:. . . well-known homosexuals . . .
Yeah, YOU and Y2K. Did the stains ever come out of the seat in the F-150?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 7:57 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Atomic Punk wrote:You are attempting to smack me for working retail when the guy sucking and gulping your 2 incher when you are on Cialis... R-Jacked works in retail as he has nowhere else to go.
I know I am but what is R-Jack? KC applauds your latest smack failure.
Btw -- no one attempts to smack another person for working in retail. If you're 40something years old and get harasssed by irate customers in a store on a daily basis, you're a loser. Your nametag speaks for itself, chooch.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:14 pm
by Atomic Punk
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 if 'roid raging wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:You are attempting to smack me for working retail when the guy sucking and gulping your 2 incher when you are on Cialis... R-Jacked works in retail as he has nowhere else to go.
I know I am but what is R-Jack? KC applauds your latest smack failure.
Btw -- no one attempts to smack another person for working in retail. If you're 40something years old and get harasssed by irate customers in a store on a daily basis, you're a loser. Your nametag speaks for itself, chooch.
What's your point 'roid rager? --> Sweaty, bald-headed, goatee wearing muscle freak that couldn't get laid in a morgue guy... So I work in retail? R-Jacked does. You're smacking him between your Dynabol butt injections now?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:28 pm
by Atomic Punk
Imus/SG's sis wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:. . . well-known homosexuals . . .
Yeah, YOU and Y2K. Did the stains ever come out of the seat in the F-150?
Did you know SG's sister has the best ass ever seen on these smack boards? That is one hot chick! What say you? Why are you so bitter? I gave you a compliment too...
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:42 pm
by Goober McTuber
Atomic Punk wrote:
Imus/SG's sis wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:. . . well-known homosexuals . . .
Yeah, YOU and Y2K. Did the stains ever come out of the seat in the F-150?
Did you know SG's sister has the best ass ever seen on these smack boards?
That, and a butter-face.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:45 pm
by R-Jack
Atomic Punk wrote:Imus/SG's sis
I'm not going to ask why you feel the need to try and out every troll, but how you fail so badly every time
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:48 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Katatonically Crunked wrote:R-Jacked does.
Ease up there, KC. So. You were a minimum wage making paint barista. Tell me more. More.
P.S. If/when I feel like smacking R-Jack, I'll let you know.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:50 pm
by Atomic Punk
Goober McTuber wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
Did you know SG's sister has the best ass ever seen on these smack boards?
That, and a butter-face.
Come on now!
I would like to see a poll thread rating her from 0 to 10. R-Jacked knows beauty as he is used to cleaning out the stable every night. Let's get this started!
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 8:51 pm
by R-Jack
Tom Brady sux and is gax
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:41 pm
by War Wagon
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Ease up there, KC.
Whether or not the rep is deserved (not so much unless your nic is Paul) at least we're not AP.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:59 pm
by PSUFAN
Cuda wrote:
PSUFAN wrote:I definitely profess ignorance about "Further", though that may cost me in your estimation, little guy.
oh, my...
at you, not with you
Say what you want about my posts, CTRL-Cuda - who elicits a Fresno Melt better than I do, though?
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:59 pm
by Goober McTuber
Atomic Punk wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:
Atomic Punk wrote:
Did you know SG's sister has the best ass ever seen on these smack boards?
That, and a butter-face.
Come on now!
I would like to see a poll thread rating her from 0 to 10.
From the front, she gets a 4.
From the back, 8.5.
Inches.
Re: Trouble learning Pitt's new Offense
Posted: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:35 am
by Cuda
PSUFAN wrote: who elicits a Fresno Melt better than I do, though?
you're like a rooster taking credit for the sunrise