Brown's Budget Veto
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
Re: Brown's Budget Veto
Do you people not have a balanced budget amendment? Just curious...
Re: Brown's Budget Veto
Don't know if it's an "amendment" but it's a legal requirement. That was one of the reasons he was able to veto it, because the state Controller (or somebody) decided that it was $2 billion short.
Re: Brown's Budget Veto
Great cartoon Mikey...I guess you have to live in this nightfreaknmare to totally understand it.
The line has actually been drawn to a certain point, it interesting where this is headed.
The line has actually been drawn to a certain point, it interesting where this is headed.
Re: Brown's Budget Veto
Yes, but this is the first budget that has been submitted since the law passed.Truman wrote:Do you people not have a balanced budget amendment? Just curious...
Our legislators don't get paid if they don't submit a balanced budget by the constitutional deadline of June 15th. The Democrat asswipes who passed that ridiculous piece of shit budget thought they found a cute way to get paid. They're acting like children who do a shitty, half-assed job on their chores and still demand their allowance.
Here's a Democunt from Burbank, Mike Gotto:
Poor little guy. I wonder if his "fulfilling private sector career path" tolerates repeated failures to make deadlines. I'm guessing not.I halted a fulfilling private sector career path to enter public service.
"I now have to explain to my wife and daughter that we won't be able to pay the bills because a politician chose to grandstand at our expense.
"California has officially degenerated into a Banana Republic, with one branch of government withholding the pay of another. I wonder if the Controller plans on withholding the pay of judges if he disagrees with one of their decisions."
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.