Re: Off-Road Vette
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 3:11 pm
I'm just glad you turned your lens to unsuspecting cars instead of creeping out 20-somethings.
Fuck 'em. Who cares if they're comfortable or not? If they're so "uncomfortable" then maybe they shouldn't be walking around with their tits and asses hanging out all over the place. It's all an act anyway.Sudden Sam wrote:I can't even pretend that I think I look young enough to make them feel comfortable any more.
You would be better off learning how to drive in snow and ice. Four wheel drive really only helps when you get extreme snow. I live in a place that gets 2 times the show you'll get in NH and by no means is an SUV a necessity.Ana Ng wrote:Whoa? I've never even one of those GT-Rs?
Weird that since this impending move to NH next month, I tend to focus mostly on SUVs now. :(
BSmack wrote: You would be better off learning how to drive in snow and ice. Four wheel drive really only helps when you get extreme snow. I live in a place that gets 2 times the show you'll get in NH and by no means is an SUV a necessity.
smackaholic wrote: oh, never mind. he didn't say that. he said that for normal winter driving in CNY you can get by just fine without it
Dins, major metro areas back east have these things called "plows." They do a real good job of moving snow. And when things are so bad that plows can't keep up, (which might happen once a year where she is) she's still not doing to be looking at anything more than a foot of snow on the road during the WORST possible Nor'easter. Trust me, people wreck just as often around here with SUVs as they do with standard front wheel drive vehicles. She would be just as safe with a standard front wheel drive car as an SUV. The main thing she should be looking at is anti-lock braking. That should be mandatory for her next car. If she's really bent of getting more traction than she needs, she should get an all wheel drive car, not an SUV. A 4WD SUV is total overkill and is only useful for hauling things.Dinsdale wrote::massiverolleyes:BSmack wrote: You would be better off learning how to drive in snow and ice. Four wheel drive really only helps when you get extreme snow. I live in a place that gets 2 times the show you'll get in NH and by no means is an SUV a necessity.
I live close to the snowiest place on earth, and what you just posted is beyond inane. Not only does it average more snow than anywhere else, there's often a 3000' elevation change while you're driving through it (unless you're hitting a ski resort, than you can drive 5000' feet through it). And I'd be willing to bet everyone who frequently does the trip would fall over laughing at your post.
"4WD only helps in 'extreme snow.' "
Yeah, tripling your traction doesn't help at all... dumbass.
I'd be willing to bet not everyone in your area is as big a dumbass as you, since ChuckieD would have made the area uninhabited.
I used to spend a lot of time in Syracuse and Oswego. Those towns make Rochester look like New York City for snowfall. And there were plenty of times I drove RWD cars through 6" or deep snow without so much as stuffing shutyomouth in the trunk. If you drive at the proper speed and understand how to countersteer in a skid, you can drive through any snow that isn't higher than your car's axle.smackaholic wrote:you wanna link me up with the part where Bilk says 4WD wouldn't be really fukking handy driving at hi elevations in the cascades?
oh, never mind. he didn't say that. he said that for normal winter driving in CNY you can get by just fine without it, so long as you aren't needing to go out in the middle of a fukking blizzard.
he is right.
4WD is the cat's ass, when you really, really need it, like when you just have to get to the ski lodge somewhere on the side of mt hood, right. fukking. now. but, if you live in most places, it is an unnecessary expense in a number of ways.
and there is the added entertainment value of throttle induced oversteer. yeehaw. as for getting through 6 inches without the shutyomouth traction option, i'd say, yeah maybe....until you throw in a few nice hills. then you'll wish you had a few more pounds over the driven wheels.BSmack wrote:I used to spend a lot of time in Syracuse and Oswego. Those towns make Rochester look like New York City for snowfall. And there were plenty of times I drove RWD cars through 6" or deep snow without so much as stuffing shutyomouth in the trunk. If you drive at the proper speed and understand how to countersteer in a skid, you can drive through any snow that isn't higher than your car's axle.smackaholic wrote:you wanna link me up with the part where Bilk says 4WD wouldn't be really fukking handy driving at hi elevations in the cascades?
oh, never mind. he didn't say that. he said that for normal winter driving in CNY you can get by just fine without it, so long as you aren't needing to go out in the middle of a fukking blizzard.
he is right.
4WD is the cat's ass, when you really, really need it, like when you just have to get to the ski lodge somewhere on the side of mt hood, right. fukking. now. but, if you live in most places, it is an unnecessary expense in a number of ways.
I've been driving the last 4 years with a RWD vehicle. Never have I felt the need to drop weight in the back. Then again, I usually don't go seeking out steep grades in blizzards.smackaholic wrote:and there is the added entertainment value of throttle induced oversteer. yeehaw. as for getting through 6 inches without the shutyomouth traction option, i'd say, yeah maybe....until you throw in a few nice hills. then you'll wish you had a few more pounds over the driven wheels.
I've dealt with more snowfall in a week than Dinsdale has in his entire life, and I approve this message.BSmack wrote:Dins, major metro areas back east have these things called "plows." They do a real good job of moving snow. And when things are so bad that plows can't keep up, (which might happen once a year where she is) she's still not doing to be looking at anything more than a foot of snow on the road during the WORST possible Nor'easter. Trust me, people wreck just as often around here with SUVs as they do with standard front wheel drive vehicles. She would be just as safe with a standard front wheel drive car as an SUV. The main thing she should be looking at is anti-lock braking. That should be mandatory for her next car. If she's really bent of getting more traction than she needs, she should get an all wheel drive car, not an SUV. A 4WD SUV is total overkill and is only useful for hauling things.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I've dealt with more snowfall in a week than Dinsdale has in his entire life, and I approve this message.
I'm with MV and SFAF: Who give a fuck?IndyFrisco wrote:I'm just glad you turned your lens to unsuspecting cars instead of creeping out 20-somethings.
Dins,Dinsdale wrote:MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:I've dealt with more snowfall in a week than Dinsdale has in his entire life, and I approve this message.
I'm not sure which part of "snowiest place on earth" you're struggling with.
I can see it from my freaking house. But sinceI'm not an idiot (OK, debatable), I choose not to live there. Every now and then, I have the misfortune of having to traverse it, and occasionally seek recreation in it (not a skier).
When you have to dig through doule digit snow to get out the front door, get back to me. Until then, don't assume there isn't fleets of plows. And don't assume we don't have 10'+ weeks of snow... because then you sound silly.
I spent 4 days working at Santiam Pass in nonstop snow, some of which was blizzard. Had feet in those 4 days, and my coworker and I... check this out... we had to drive through it. And here's where it gets crazy -- we used 4WD. Couldn't imagine doing it without.
Anyone who thinks it isn't a night/day difference is a fool.
your bro's a lesbian?BSmack wrote: Even then a Subaru would likely be more than adequate. It seems to work just fine for my brother in Vermont.
Of course he's a lesbian. He also grows his own granola using nothing but organic alpaca dung as fertilizer.smackaholic wrote:your bro's a lesbian?BSmack wrote: Even then a Subaru would likely be more than adequate. It seems to work just fine for my brother in Vermont.
pre or post op?
Sure, WE could.Toddowen wrote:And if the ground clearance wasn't there, you could always lift it up and over the snow bank.
I wasn't aware you needed 4WD to look at snow from a distance. In any event, that's why I said "dealt with," jackass. I can see a lot of snow by flipping on the nature channel, but actually dealing with lake effect snow in West Michigan on a daily basis results in a better education.Dinsdale wrote:I can see it from my freaking house. But sinceI'm not an idiot (OK, debatable), I choose not to live there. Every now and then, I have the misfortune of having to traverse it, and occasionally seek recreation in it (not a skier).
Where I grew up we called that "winter."When you have to dig through doule digit snow to get out the front door, get back to me.
Where I grew up we called that "winter."nonstop snow
You guessed it, "winter."blizzard
When you get over 50 feet, let me know.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Where I grew up we called that "winter."
Improvement? Yes. Necessity? That depends where you live. If it wasn't a necessity where I grew up, it sure won't be where Ana's moving to. And any bullshit non sequiturs about 50' of snow, the Cascades, and that one time you drove in a blizzard doesn't change anything.So, in conclusion, the people who have driven different vehicles in different amounts of snow seem to universally agree that 4WD/AWD is a HUGE freaking improveent, if not a necessity.
It is a SLIGHT improvement under anything but the most adverse conditions. PERIOD. Certainly not worth the extra money unless you are consistently driving in remote areas that are not plowed often or if you are hauling in adverse conditions on a FREQUENT basis. Also, if you are plowing with a pickup truck, 4x4 is a necessity. Otherwise you are just pissing money away. But hey, don't listen to people who deal with copious amounts of lake effect snow. You're Dinsdale, you know everything.Dinsdale wrote:So, in conclusion, the people who have driven different vehicles in different amounts of snow seem to universally agree that 4WD/AWD is a HUGE freaking improveent, if not a necessity.
A slight improvement?BSmack wrote:It is a SLIGHT improvement under anything but the most adverse conditions. PERIOD. Certainly not worth the extra money unless you are consistently driving in remote areas that are not plowed often or if you are hauling in adverse conditions on a FREQUENT basis. Also, if you are plowing with a pickup truck, 4x4 is a necessity. Otherwise you are just pissing money away. But hey, don't listen to people who deal with copious amounts of lake effect snow. You're Dinsdale, you know everything.Dinsdale wrote:So, in conclusion, the people who have driven different vehicles in different amounts of snow seem to universally agree that 4WD/AWD is a HUGE freaking improveent, if not a necessity.
You're welcome for the sig.
then, go get you one. you too, dins. those of us that rather waste money on whatever will do so.Trampis wrote:A slight improvement?BSmack wrote:It is a SLIGHT improvement under anything but the most adverse conditions. PERIOD. Certainly not worth the extra money unless you are consistently driving in remote areas that are not plowed often or if you are hauling in adverse conditions on a FREQUENT basis. Also, if you are plowing with a pickup truck, 4x4 is a necessity. Otherwise you are just pissing money away. But hey, don't listen to people who deal with copious amounts of lake effect snow. You're Dinsdale, you know everything.Dinsdale wrote:So, in conclusion, the people who have driven different vehicles in different amounts of snow seem to universally agree that 4WD/AWD is a HUGE freaking improveent, if not a necessity.
You're welcome for the sig.
Bro, 4wd is way better, waaaaayyyyyy better.
Personally, I think its worth the extra dough to own a 4wd for the 5-10 days per year where it comes in handy.
He didn't grow up in Chicago winters, but yes, Plainfield Twp (MI) has pretty good plow services courtesy of Kent County. Plus people know how to drive in snow there and aren't weather pussies, so that helps.KC Scott wrote:Mgo - I can only imagine you were either in the city or a flat suburb where you had excellent city plow services to survive chicago winters without it
Along with all the extra money one usually pays for having it serviced (I'm sure you do your own, but most don't)?KC Scott wrote:I gotta agree with Trampis, the the 5 - 10 days a year I engage it (like the Blizzard Feb 1) it's worth the 7K more I paid and the 4 mpg I lose driving it
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Granted, I usually WFH whenever there's a major storm
Same here. It is rural as well as lots of hills. When I moved here, I had a RWD Ford F150, stick shift. After the first winter I had here (28" in 30 hours at one point), I traded that motherfucker in for a 4WD truck. Have not had any problems since. Traded my wife's Grand Prix GTP in for a 4WD SUV because we could not get up our driveway with it in the snow. Just bought a new 4WD SUV and keep my truck in the detached garage as a backup vehicle which we have needed a couple times. I would not have it any other way.KC Scott wrote:I've got a bunch of friends in Minneapolis and ALL of them have 4x4 - same for their wives. Maybe it's more rural thing.
Dinsdale wrote: So, in conclusion, the people who have driven different vehicles in different amounts of snow seem to universally agree that 4WD/AWD is a HUGE freaking improveent, if not a necessity.
Which I guess means the rest are... talking out their ass.
You paid 7k more foe a feature that you only use, at most, 10 times a year? Seems to me it would be cheaper to learn how to drive. But hey, its your money.KC Scott wrote:I've got a bunch of friends in Minneapolis and ALL of them have 4x4 - same for their wives. Maybe it's more rural thing.
I gotta agree with Trampis, the the 5 - 10 days a year I engage it (like the Blizzard Feb 1) it's worth the 7K more I paid and the 4 mpg I lose driving it