T1B

Boise State vs. Texas A&M

This is our year.

ATM would have to win in Norman....it's been a long time. John Blake and 3-5 win Sooner teams long time ago. Ryan Tannehill is the name you are looking for Sam.

Bama vs...


Oregon


We lost some key players, but we bought some really good replacements.

King Crimson wrote:ATM would have to win in Norman....it's been a long time. John Blake and 3-5 win Sooner teams long time ago. Ryan Tannehill is the name you are looking for Sam.

Really? I had not looked at the schedule.

He asked to call your shot. I did. I haven't picked A&M to win even the South since probably 1999 so I hope you're not calling that a homer pick. I think the South is a toss-up between A&M and OU. With our returning class, yeah, I think we can beat a team we beat last year at home 33-19 on their turf. I think we can lose there as well. The fact we have not won in Norman in 14 years has fuck all to do with 2011. I'm going with the W. I know it is easier to take shots at someone else's predictions than to stick your neck out and make your own, but you should try it. As Sam said, it's always fun to go back to these threads after the fact and see who GUESSED right and who GUESSED wrong.

Oklahoma beats Stanford for the big glass knickknack.

IndyFrisco wrote: I know it is easier to take shots at someone else's predictions than to stick your neck out and make your own, but you should try it.

oh please. you want "credit" for sticking your neck out....and get bent/insinuate i'm taking the cowards role....when i make a simple observation about the schedule that others may not be aware of. yeah, OK. overreact much? are you sure didn't mean to pick Cal or Iowa?

Aside from our trip to Norman, our schedule is rather favorable. Again, every team has at least one game on their schedule (sup @FSU?) that is either a loss or a toss-up.

Here's our away schedule:
@ tceh
@ OU
@ KSU
@ ISU

Home:
SMU
Idaho
t.u.
Okie St.
Misery
Kansas
Baylor

Neutral:
Arkansas (in Dallas with new QB)

Yeah, I think we will be favored in every game sans the OU game assuming we both enter the game undefeated. We could even be favored in the OU game on the road dependeing on how both teams are playing. In any case, we have the best running game in the Big XII this year. I'd take Tannehill 10 times out of 10 over Jones. Your defense is better than ours, but I don't think significantly enough to shut us down. Saying A&M can go undefeated is not a blind ass homer pick. I've never predicted they would go undefeated. This year, I think we can. And to be honest, I can truly see a 0-1 loss SEC team playing BSU in the BCS championship even if A&M goes undefeated simply due to preseason starting positions in the polls.

Oklahoma vs. Stanford is my call.

IndyFrisco wrote:

King Crimson wrote:ATM would have to win in Norman....it's been a long time. John Blake and 3-5 win Sooner teams long time ago. Ryan Tannehill is the name you are looking for Sam.

Really? I had not looked at the schedule.

He asked to call your shot. I did. I haven't picked A&M to win even the South since probably 1999 so I hope you're not calling that a homer pick. I think the South is a toss-up between A&M and OU. With our returning class, yeah, I think we can beat a team we beat last year at home 33-19 on their turf. I think we can lose there as well. The fact we have not won in Norman in 14 years has fuck all to do with 2011. I'm going with the W. I know it is easier to take shots at someone else's predictions than to stick your neck out and make your own, but you should try it. As Sam said, it's always fun to go back to these threads after the fact and see who GUESSED right and who GUESSED wrong.

The last time the Texas Farmer Institute won in this series this is what happened on the return trip.

(P.S. Brad this is what it looks like to have third and fourth stringers in the third quarter and taking knees in the fourth so you don't run up the score)

aTm is 2-12 all time in Norman, the last time they won was before Bob Stoops was head coach, before that WWII wasn't concluded yet. In 1999 aTm came in ranked and OU unranked and they got beat by 44 points. In 1993 they were the #4 team in the country and expected to have a chance at a national title and Oklahoma was barely receiving votes to be in the poll, Oklahoma won by 30.

Oklahoma played what was probably it's worst game of the season last year in College station. Hiking a ball into the end zone is not dominance by aTm, tripping on your own feet in the middle of the field at the 45 yard line is not some wizardry of athletic ability by aTm to break a long pass play for a TD. Dropping the ball right through your hands on the snap is not some magical play call from aTm to recover a fumble inside the opposing team's 30.

I'm more concerned with about 1/3 of schedule than I am with Texas Farmer Institute being played in Norman; Florida State, Missouri, Oklahoma State, and Texas in a rivalry match up are all more worrisome to me than Aggy. Aggy has only stayed within single digits of OU twice in Norman since 1950 . . .

And all those historical games mean how much in 2011? Jack shit. Maybe that's why A&M beat OU last year by 2 TDs. OUFan is so fucking myopic.

The only team that can beat OU is OU.

IndyFrisco wrote:And all those historical games mean how much in 2011? Jack shit. Maybe that's why A&M beat OU last year by 2 TDs. OUFan is so fucking myopic.

The only team that can beat OU is OU.

Sig bet on the game? I'll call it now . . . hell I'll even spot you 6 points.

Myopia is having one decent season and thinking it's suddenly your year. Myopia is "Holy shit we didn't finish fifth or sixth in our division again last season, we're going to the national title game, Wooooooo!!!" Myopia is thinking you're going to waltz into a stadium with the longest home win streak in college football and waltz back out with a W.

Like I said, I'm more scared of at least four other games on our schedule than I am Aggy, including Texas. Missouri has at least proven it doesn't wilt like a tulip in during a heat wave every time it crosses north of the Red River. Okie Lite and Florida State scare me infinitely more than aTm does.

I wonder what tune Farmer and Vet nation is going to be whistling when they're sporting a three or four loss fat lip in mid November and looking up at four different teams in the conference standings.

Sudden Sam wrote:Never knew how much hatred for Texas there was by the rest of the league.

Wait, yer like 72 and didn't realize how much people hated Texas?...especially Big 12 folks? Good lord, Sam, just how deep has your head been buried in the anus of the SEC?

Sure, sig bet. Whatever. Sig bets are stupid.

Had Gabbert come back, I'd pick Misery as a toss-up game. Right now, they are an unknown. Okie St beat us last year at their house on a last second kick. Jerrod Johnson had 4 INTs. I think we beat OSU at home this year, maybe by double digits. Arkansas is reloading, and I don't see them beating us.

Will we go undefeated? I'd be willing to bet $100 on a Vegas ticket for A&M to win it all no matter what the line is on us right now even though it is unlikely. I will be in Vegas in October, and I plan to do so if the Hilton has their lines still open for such a bet...assuming we're still undefeated seeing as how this isn't working out too well for me...

IndyFrisco wrote:Aside from our trip to Norman, our schedule is rather favorable. Again, every team has at least one game on their schedule (sup @FSU?) that is either a loss or a toss-up.

Here's our away schedule:
@ tceh
@ OU
@ KSU
@ ISU

Home:
SMU
Idaho
t.u.
Okie St.
Misery
Kansas
Baylor

Neutral:
Arkansas (in Dallas with new QB)

Yeah, I think we will be favored in every game sans the OU game assuming we both enter the game undefeated. We could even be favored in the OU game on the road dependeing on how both teams are playing. In any case, we have the best running game in the Big XII this year. I'd take Tannehill 10 times out of 10 over Jones. Your defense is better than ours, but I don't think significantly enough to shut us down. Saying A&M can go undefeated is not a blind ass homer pick. I've never predicted they would go undefeated. This year, I think we can. And to be honest, I can truly see a 0-1 loss SEC team playing BSU in the BCS championship even if A&M goes undefeated simply due to preseason starting positions in the polls.

You have the best running game in the conference? Geez, wish you had informed, Athlon, Street and Smith's, Phil Steele, and ESPN of this development because they all have Oklahoma as having the best runningback unit in the conference; and only one of them has Oklahoma outside of the top 3 in the country. Oklahoma easily has the best FB in the conference with Millard and it isn't even close. Finch, Brown (who ESPN compared to Adrian Peterson during the spring), Clay, and Calhoun. Oklahoma has four different TBs who would be the likely full time starter at at least seven of the other programs in the conference; not one or two but four.

You'd take Tannehill over Jones? You'd take a guy who didn't even start last season at QB last year over a kid who is one of the top three choices as a Heisman finalist and projected as a top 10 pick in the NFL Draft? I haven't seen Tannehill rated above Weeden and Griffen from any publication. At best, personally, I would consider Tannehill the fourth best quarterback in the conference and far below Landry Jones.

Our Wide Receiver corp is most certainly better and deeper than aTm's. The OLine easily leaps and bounds ahead of aTm's as well.

Defensively we have the best LB in the conference with Travis Lewis and outside of the Dline I do believe we are significantly better; having 8 guys returning for defense that was already obviously better over the course of the season last year than aggy might have something to do with that notion. Far be it from me to have the audacity to insinuate that one team who gave up fewer yards, had more sack, more interceptions, and a far better turnover margin than the other with the same number of returning starters is probably better than the other.

Sudden Sam wrote:Need more picks for the title game. Come on, you pussies.

Buffalo over Middle Tennessee. Bank on it.

I don't know, but I miss m2ool too.... :(


It's hard to find pure unprocessed bitches....though noj tries.

Here's a shot

Florida St. over LSU.


just cause it WONT be how i'd predict ANYHOW.

SunCoastSooner wrote:

IndyFrisco wrote:Aside from our trip to Norman, our schedule is rather favorable. Again, every team has at least one game on their schedule (sup @FSU?) that is either a loss or a toss-up.

Here's our away schedule:
@ tceh
@ OU
@ KSU
@ ISU

Home:
SMU
Idaho
t.u.
Okie St.
Misery
Kansas
Baylor

Neutral:
Arkansas (in Dallas with new QB)

Yeah, I think we will be favored in every game sans the OU game assuming we both enter the game undefeated. We could even be favored in the OU game on the road dependeing on how both teams are playing. In any case, we have the best running game in the Big XII this year. I'd take Tannehill 10 times out of 10 over Jones. Your defense is better than ours, but I don't think significantly enough to shut us down. Saying A&M can go undefeated is not a blind ass homer pick. I've never predicted they would go undefeated. This year, I think we can. And to be honest, I can truly see a 0-1 loss SEC team playing BSU in the BCS championship even if A&M goes undefeated simply due to preseason starting positions in the polls.

You have the best running game in the conference? Geez, wish you had informed, Athlon, Street and Smith's, Phil Steele, and ESPN of this development because they all have Oklahoma as having the best runningback unit in the conference; and only one of them has Oklahoma outside of the top 3 in the country. Oklahoma easily has the best FB in the conference with Millard and it isn't even close. Finch, Brown (who ESPN compared to Adrian Peterson during the spring), Clay, and Calhoun. Oklahoma has four different TBs who would be the likely full time starter at at least seven of the other programs in the conference; not one or two but four.

You'd take Tannehill over Jones? You'd take a guy who didn't even start last season at QB last year over a kid who is one of the top three choices as a Heisman finalist and projected as a top 10 pick in the NFL Draft? I haven't seen Tannehill rated above Weeden and Griffen from any publication. At best, personally, I would consider Tannehill the fourth best quarterback in the conference and far below Landry Jones.

Our Wide Receiver corp is most certainly better and deeper than aTm's. The OLine easily leaps and bounds ahead of aTm's as well.

Defensively we have the best LB in the conference with Travis Lewis and outside of the Dline I do believe we are significantly better; having 8 guys returning for defense that was already obviously better over the course of the season last year than aggy might have something to do with that notion. Far be it from me to have the audacity to insinuate that one team who gave up fewer yards, had more sack, more interceptions, and a far better turnover margin than the other with the same number of returning starters is probably better than the other.

Hey, cute take and all, but I don't do the back and forth thing where we argue about what WILL happen up until it happens. I've laid my take down and so has GoonerFan. We'll see how it plays out. Until then, good luck. I hope A&M and OU meet each other undefeated.

SunCoastSooner wrote:Like I said, I'm more scared of at least four other games on our schedule than I am Aggy, including Texas. Missouri has at least proven it doesn't wilt like a tulip in during a heat wave every time it crosses north of the Red River. Okie Lite and Florida State scare me infinitely more than aTm does.

Oh and in the rank the teams in your conference thread...

SunCoastSooner wrote:1. Oklahoma
2. Texas A&M
3. Missouri
4. Oklahoma State
5. Kansas State
6. Baylor
7. Texas
8. Texas Tech
9. Iowa State
10. Kansas

Soooo, you think A&M is the second best team in the conference yet you are more worried about #3, #4 and #7? Make up your fucking mind.

And as for KC...we see a pattern here. Harv ranks the teams in the conference. Rather than KC doing his own ranking, he takes a shot at Harv's picks:

King Crimson wrote:

Harvdog wrote:1. Oklahoma - They are loaded this year. They should play for the MNC.

Harv doing some reverse sandbagging.... :D
...
this is the kind of team you'd expect to have a chance, but there are no "should's" about playing for the Big Prize imo.

One thing I can agree with KC on is there are no "shoulds" about playing in the NC game. That's why those in here who are guessing are doing just that...guessing.

IndyFrisco wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:Like I said, I'm more scared of at least four other games on our schedule than I am Aggy, including Texas. Missouri has at least proven it doesn't wilt like a tulip in during a heat wave every time it crosses north of the Red River. Okie Lite and Florida State scare me infinitely more than aTm does.

Oh and in the rank the teams in your conference thread...

SunCoastSooner wrote:1. Oklahoma
2. Texas A&M
3. Missouri
4. Oklahoma State
5. Kansas State
6. Baylor
7. Texas
8. Texas Tech
9. Iowa State
10. Kansas

Soooo, you think A&M is the second best team in the conference yet you are more worried about #3, #4 and #7? Make up your fucking mind.

And as for KC...we see a pattern here. Harv ranks the teams in the conference. Rather than KC doing his own ranking, he takes a shot at Harv's picks:

King Crimson wrote:

Harvdog wrote:1. Oklahoma - They are loaded this year. They should play for the MNC.

Harv doing some reverse sandbagging.... :D
...
this is the kind of team you'd expect to have a chance, but there are no "should's" about playing for the Big Prize imo.

One thing I can agree with KC on is there are no "shoulds" about playing in the NC game. That's why those in here who are guessing are doing just that...guessing.

Oklahoma State and Texas are rivalry games. We also play in Stillwater, again, not Norman against the Pokes. Even when Texas is bad they get up for the Oklahoma game and fight. I believe Oklahoma State is slightly better than aTm but I gave the Farmers the nod over the Vets because their heads up is in college station. Missouri doesn't normally wilt in Norman like aTm has for time immemorial; if we were playing them in Dallas or KC in December they would concern me.

Sudden Sam wrote:Wish everyone would throwe their picks for the championship game in here.

Grow some balls.

We put ours up. Stop your whining. This topic has eliceted the most lively non-troll discussion on the board in weeks. STFU and enjoy it.

SunCoastSooner wrote:STFU and enjoy it.

Cheers, motherfucker. It's good to be talkin' actual football and not about who's cheating again.

Sudden Sam wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

Sudden Sam wrote:Never knew how much hatred for Texas there was by the rest of the league.

Wait, yer like 72 and didn't realize how much people hated Texas?...especially Big 12 folks? Good lord, Sam, just how deep has your head been buried in the anus of the SEC?

Ha! Just never looked into it a lot. Knew they weren't liked, but i didn't realize how much the 'Horns dictated everything. I had always looked at OU and UT as equals.

Texas didn't try and start dictating anything until last summer. Nebraska was the issue for the previous two decades; I posted about that in a couple other threads over the years and one pretty recently:

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37359&hilit=SWC&start=40#p713430

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=29288&p=573837&hili ... re#p573837

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=33116&hilit=SWC#p625207

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=38680&start=40#p741270

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37359&hilit=SWC&start=40#p713308

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37359&hilit=SWC&start=40#p713379

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37359&hilit=SWC&start=40#p713432

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=34059&hilit=SWC&start=200#p660386

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=33116&hilit=SWC#p624203

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=33116&hilit=SWC#p624906

SunCoastSooner wrote:Oklahoma vs. Stanford is my call.

IndyFrisco wrote:

King Crimson wrote:ATM would have to win in Norman....it's been a long time. John Blake and 3-5 win Sooner teams long time ago. Ryan Tannehill is the name you are looking for Sam.

Really? I had not looked at the schedule.

He asked to call your shot. I did. I haven't picked A&M to win even the South since probably 1999 so I hope you're not calling that a homer pick. I think the South is a toss-up between A&M and OU. With our returning class, yeah, I think we can beat a team we beat last year at home 33-19 on their turf. I think we can lose there as well. The fact we have not won in Norman in 14 years has fuck all to do with 2011. I'm going with the W. I know it is easier to take shots at someone else's predictions than to stick your neck out and make your own, but you should try it. As Sam said, it's always fun to go back to these threads after the fact and see who GUESSED right and who GUESSED wrong.

The last time the Texas Farmer Institute won in this series this is what happened on the return trip.

(P.S. Brad this is what it looks like to have third and fourth stringers in the third quarter and taking knees in the fourth so you don't run up the score)

aTm is 2-12 all time in Norman, the last time they won was before Bob Stoops was head coach, before that WWII wasn't concluded yet. In 1999 aTm came in ranked and OU unranked and they got beat by 44 points. In 1993 they were the #4 team in the country and expected to have a chance at a national title and Oklahoma was barely receiving votes to be in the poll, Oklahoma won by 30.

Oklahoma played what was probably it's worst game of the season last year in College station. Hiking a ball into the end zone is not dominance by aTm, tripping on your own feet in the middle of the field at the 45 yard line is not some wizardry of athletic ability by aTm to break a long pass play for a TD. Dropping the ball right through your hands on the snap is not some magical play call from aTm to recover a fumble inside the opposing team's 30.

I'm more concerned with about 1/3 of schedule than I am with Texas Farmer Institute being played in Norman; Florida State, Missouri, Oklahoma State, and Texas in a rivalry match up are all more worrisome to me than Aggy. Aggy has only stayed within single digits of OU twice in Norman since 1950 . . .

actually suncoast, THE MOST FAMOUS example of 3rd and 4th stringers in a game has to be the 96 fiesta bowl.
you remember dont you? Dr. Tom? instead of putting up 70 on spurrier, brings in a 4th string 150 pound freshman quarterback to take a knee on the inch yard line?

Im not sure you followed the huskers in 95, cause if you did, you'd realize that their games were blowouts by the 2nd quarter, so Dr. Tom routinely put in all the scrubs. NOW, you'll probably call me a liar, and I am used to it by now, HOWEVER, I personally witnessed that entire season, and its a proven fact that what I am saying is 100 percent accurate,
any problem with that?

bradhusker wrote:actually suncoast, THE MOST FAMOUS example of 3rd and 4th stringers in a game has to be the 96 fiesta bowl.
you remember dont you? Dr. Tom? instead of putting up 70 on spurrier, brings in a 4th string 150 pound freshman quarterback to take a knee on the inch yard line?

Im not sure you followed the huskers in 95, cause if you did, you'd realize that their games were blowouts by the 2nd quarter, so Dr. Tom routinely put in all the scrubs. NOW, you'll probably call me a liar, and I am used to it by now, HOWEVER, I personally witnessed that entire season, and its a proven fact that what I am saying is 100 percent accurate,
any problem with that?

The same 1995 Huskers who barely beat 3-8 Washington State? And they didn't hang 70 on Florida, try lying some more . . .

SunCoastSooner wrote:

bradhusker wrote:actually suncoast, THE MOST FAMOUS example of 3rd and 4th stringers in a game has to be the 96 fiesta bowl.
you remember dont you? Dr. Tom? instead of putting up 70 on spurrier, brings in a 4th string 150 pound freshman quarterback to take a knee on the inch yard line?

Im not sure you followed the huskers in 95, cause if you did, you'd realize that their games were blowouts by the 2nd quarter, so Dr. Tom routinely put in all the scrubs. NOW, you'll probably call me a liar, and I am used to it by now, HOWEVER, I personally witnessed that entire season, and its a proven fact that what I am saying is 100 percent accurate,
any problem with that?

The same 1995 Huskers who barely beat 3-8 Washington State? And they didn't hang 70 on Florida, try lying some more . . .

ACTUALLY suncoast, I just caught you in a lie!!!!!!


I made a factual statement about the games being blowouts in the second quarter, nebraska 28 wsu 7 in the 2nd QTR, THEN, Dr. Tom brings in the 3rd and 4th string, and, wsu fights their way back into the game, AGAINST THE SCRUBS!!!
THATS A FACT!! if you try to say anything different, YOU ARE LYING!!!!!

go on, try to contradict what I just said? I dare you!!

SECOND, the fiesta bowl, January 1996, Osborne plays 2nd 3rd and 4th stringers, ANOTHER FACT!! again, go ahead and try to contradict that!! I DARE YOU!!

so, its obvious to everyone, that yes, had Osborne just went with his first team, mostly, YES, he could have hung 80 or 90 on florida. BUT, Dr. Tom didnt just play his best team all night, IN FACT, he brought in 3rd and 4th string, AND, THAT IS A FACT!!! again, go ahead and try to contradict what I just said, I DARE YOU!!!

I am beginning to realize that you LIE A LOT!!

FACTUAL STATEMENT 1, nebraska was in a blowout in the 2nd QTR, up 28 7 on wsu, so, the scrubs are quietly rotated in,
FACTUAL STATEMENT 2, nebraska was blowing out 12-0 florida in the 2nd QTR, so Osborne quietly rotates in the scrubs all night long.

go ahead? try to contradict what I just said. and I will humiliate you just like boise st. did.

go ahead, make my day punk.

bradhusker wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:

bradhusker wrote:actually suncoast, THE MOST FAMOUS example of 3rd and 4th stringers in a game has to be the 96 fiesta bowl.
you remember dont you? Dr. Tom? instead of putting up 70 on spurrier, brings in a 4th string 150 pound freshman quarterback to take a knee on the inch yard line?

Im not sure you followed the huskers in 95, cause if you did, you'd realize that their games were blowouts by the 2nd quarter, so Dr. Tom routinely put in all the scrubs. NOW, you'll probably call me a liar, and I am used to it by now, HOWEVER, I personally witnessed that entire season, and its a proven fact that what I am saying is 100 percent accurate,
any problem with that?

The same 1995 Huskers who barely beat 3-8 Washington State? And they didn't hang 70 on Florida, try lying some more . . .

ACTUALLY suncoast, I just caught you in a lie!!!!!!


I made a factual statement about the games being blowouts in the second quarter, nebraska 28 wsu 7 in the 2nd QTR, THEN, Dr. Tom brings in the 3rd and 4th string, and, wsu fights their way back into the game, AGAINST THE SCRUBS!!!
THATS A FACT!! if you try to say anything different, YOU ARE LYING!!!!!

go on, try to contradict what I just said? I dare you!!

SECOND, the fiesta bowl, January 1996, Osborne plays 2nd 3rd and 4th stringers, ANOTHER FACT!! again, go ahead and try to contradict that!! I DARE YOU!!

so, its obvious to everyone, that yes, had Osborne just went with his first team, mostly, YES, he could have hung 80 or 90 on florida. BUT, Dr. Tom didnt just play his best team all night, IN FACT, he brought in 3rd and 4th string, AND, THAT IS A FACT!!! again, go ahead and try to contradict what I just said, I DARE YOU!!!

I am beginning to realize that you LIE A LOT!!

FACTUAL STATEMENT 1, nebraska was in a blowout in the 2nd QTR, up 28 7 on wsu, so, the scrubs are quietly rotated in,
FACTUAL STATEMENT 2, nebraska was blowing out 12-0 florida in the 2nd QTR, so Osborne quietly rotates in the scrubs all night long.

go ahead? try to contradict what I just said. and I will humiliate you just like boise st. did.

go ahead, make my day punk.

LET ME EMBARRASS YOU FURTHER!!!

wanna know the HUGE difference between a national champ like 95 nebraska and 2000 oklahoma?

95 nebraska was up 28-7 in just the 2nd QTR when the scrubs were rotated in, NOW, lets talk about 2000 national champ oklahoma against 2-9 fag okie st.???? in that game, your beloved sooners MUST play the FIRST team until the VERY END, just to hang on and win against a 2-9 bottom dweller???

IF you wanna dance with me, I PLAY HARDBALL PUNK!!! I embarrass your sorry sooner ass, and make you look the fool/

whatsamatter sooner? YOU DONT LIKE FACTS? facts are nasty things to a serial liar like you? arent they?

Brad, you're troll is so full of fail and bullshit it's sad. You don't even know how to troll properly.

Nebraska was shutout the first quarter by Washington State in 1995. Washington State lead going into the second quarter 7-0. Nebraska opened the 2nd quarter with a FG. The score was 20-7 at half time; only in your delusional mind was the score ever 28-7 in the second quarter. Washington State pulled within 7 after a 34 yard pass from Chad Davis to Shaun Tims. Washington State had recovered a fumble by Ahman Green in the red zone but Chad Davis turned back around and fumbled the ball on the Nebraska 4 yard line which was scooped up and ran back for a Husker TD with 32 seconds left in the game which accounted for the 14 point final deficit. Tommy Frazier, Ahman Green, and Lawerence Phillips were all still on the field on Nebraska's last drive of the day.

Congrats on your poor attempts to pull Sooner teams from 17 years ago into the fray to make yourself feel better about the dismal atrocity the current Nebbitch program has become. Is Corn Cult on its fourth or fifth coach since that era? I lose count . . .

Feel free to make more shit up about your beloved Corn Cult. Setting your bullshit aflame is getting a little old though.

HEY suncoast? that doesnt answer my question of how your national champion sooners got their asses handed to them by the dismal 2-9 cowboys.

BOTTOM LINE? THIS YEAR? RIGHT NOW? MY TEAM IS GONNA BE BETTER THAN YOUR TEAAM.
so, take your marbles and go home.

bradhusker wrote:HEY suncoast? that doesnt answer my question of how your national champion sooners got their asses handed to them by the dismal 2-9 cowboys.

BOTTOM LINE? THIS YEAR? RIGHT NOW? MY TEAM IS GONNA BE BETTER THAN YOUR TEAAM.
so, take your marbles and go home.

Sudden Sam wrote: Only problem with your matchup is: (someone wake Felix up) will BSU make the title game after losing their opener? :wink:

I already told you it was on like a mofo.....

did you see where the Mountain West forced Boise State to give up their blue uniforms when playing at home? what's next, the fucking Mountain West crybabies coaches forcing Kellen Moore to sit out the first quarter? BSU can only put 10 defensive guys on the field in 3 and long situations?

Fucking moronic....

Sudden Sam wrote:

Felix wrote: did you see where the Mountain West forced Boise State to give up their blue uniforms when playing at home?

Hell, that makes sense. The Broncos are damn near invisible on that eyestrain-inducing Smurf field when they wear blue.

I wonder if the Big East will tell USF not to wear their all green uni's at home? Or the Big 10 to MSU if they wanted to wear all green?

Sudden Sam wrote:

Felix wrote: did you see where the Mountain West forced Boise State to give up their blue uniforms when playing at home?

Hell, that makes sense. The Broncos are damn near invisible on that eyestrain-inducing Smurf field when they wear blue.

you know, in all the years I've been following Boise State, I've never once heard an opposing coach say "we got our asses handed to us because Boise State blended with the field"



yeah, at field level the player absolutely turns invisible

Killian wrote:
I wonder if the Big East will tell USF not to wear their all green uni's at home? Or the Big 10 to MSU if they wanted to wear all green?

exactly

Sudden Sam wrote:The other coaches' complaint was actually that, in reviewing game film, it was difficult to see shit.

That may have been the Broncos' idea all along!

yeah, that's it....never mind the fact that they have at least 6 other games where Boise State is not wearing their home uniforms to review game films....I'm sure that Boise State dreamed up some schemes that ran exclusively when they were in their blue home unis....

if the blue turf is that far in the other coaches heads, their teams are doomed before they ever set foot in Bronco stadium

Felix wrote:you know, in all the years I've been following Boise State, I've never once heard an opposing coach say "we got our asses handed to us because Boise State blended with the field"

Hell, they'll probably start beating fools by even greater margins since this should rightly piss them off.

Complete weak sauce.

as a resident of the region for 20 years, i've followed the old WAC, 16 team WAC, and then MWC teams in the Denver media casually. they are kind of a weird outfit. you'd think their PR people would be hyping the blue to get the conference back into (never probably happen) BCS autobid discussion. losing Utah and TCU was brutal. article in the Denver Post this week talking about how the MWC was hoping to land CU (wrong, always going to the PAC whatever scenario), KSU and ISU. to my original point, the MWC has displayed almost schizo tendencies.....aggressive expansion to 16 way before anyone even thought about super-conferences or the Big East in hoops...and then, unhappy with it, a very parochial, isolationist tendency to (re)form the MWC to preserve the "traditional rivalries" of the old WAC core that were being eroded by the 16 team mega-conference (BYU-Utah, CSU-Wyo, CSU-AFA etc). then, they went and got TCU.

IndyFrisco wrote: Had Gabbert come back, I'd pick Misery as a toss-up game. Right now, they are an unknown.

new QB more a runner and less a pocket passer. we don't know if he can get the ball downfield. entire running back committee returns and all but the all-big 12 center return to the o-line. the real Mackey award winner from last year Michael Egnew returns.

d-line is deep and very good despite losing an end a lottery pick. we lost both starting corners. very good award watch list wlb and mlb. despite a very good dline and linebacking corps, the defensive stragety loves to meltdown and put safeties on the line of scrimmage leading to big passing plays. happens every fucking game and not likely to change.


oh... and our kickers have been excellent, as usualm.

Moby Dick wrote:

bradhusker wrote:HEY suncoast? that doesnt answer my question of how your national champion sooners got their asses handed to them by the dismal 2-9 cowboys.

BOTTOM LINE? THIS YEAR? RIGHT NOW? MY TEAM IS GONNA BE BETTER THAN YOUR TEAAM.
so, take your marbles and go home.

hey suncoast? YOU dont know how to troll properly!! you said, and I quote, Ahman green was still in the game in the 4th QTR? HEY MORON? green wasnt a starter in 95, you IDIOT! he was a skinny freshman,

How's that feel to be handed your ass?

bradhusker wrote:

Moby Dick wrote:

bradhusker wrote:HEY suncoast? that doesnt answer my question of how your national champion sooners got their asses handed to them by the dismal 2-9 cowboys.

BOTTOM LINE? THIS YEAR? RIGHT NOW? MY TEAM IS GONNA BE BETTER THAN YOUR TEAAM.
so, take your marbles and go home.

hey suncoast? YOU dont know how to troll properly!! you said, and I quote, Ahman green was still in the game in the 4th QTR? HEY MORON? green wasnt a starter in 95, you IDIOT! he was a skinny freshman,

How's that feel to be handed your ass?

Jesus Christos . . . you don't even know the team you are trying to troll for. Nebraska spent much of the season in the I and power I formations. Ahman Green most certainly was a starter for Nebraska in 1995. He led the Huskers in rushing attempts (141) and rushing yards (1,086, which is still the Nebraska record for a freshman running back). In comparison, Lawerence Phillips, the next leading rusher as a runningback on Nebraska, had 71 carries for 574 yards.

Every time you hit the submit button you kick your own ass even more.

WHO IS THIS TRILL? hey moron? the reason YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN? Lawerence phillips was kicked off the team for several weeks!! AND, as a result, Green was thrust into a starting role. Nebraska was 5 deep at I back in 95, so, when Phillips was suspended, green naturally moved up to the starter, BUT, I was correct, green was NOT a starter until phillips got suspended.

SO, I exposed your lying ways YET again.

AND, you lied about the 96 fiesta bowl against 12-0 florida as well.

Tom Osborne did indeed bring in the scrubs!!! 2nd 3rd and 4th teams were rotated in during the 2nd 3rd and 4th quarters.
YOU LIED YET AGAIN!!!!

in fact, throughout the entire season, Osborne routinely played the 3rd and 4th teams. SO, my advice to you?

STOP LYING AND TROLLING!!!

bradhusker wrote:WHO IS THIS TRILL? hey moron? the reason YOU ARE WRONG AGAIN? Lawerence phillips was kicked off the team for several weeks!! AND, as a result, Green was thrust into a starting role. Nebraska was 5 deep at I back in 95, so, when Phillips was suspended, green naturally moved up to the starter, BUT, I was correct, green was NOT a starter until phillips got suspended.

SO, I exposed your lying ways YET again.

AND, you lied about the 96 fiesta bowl against 12-0 florida as well.

Tom Osborne did indeed bring in the scrubs!!! 2nd 3rd and 4th teams were rotated in during the 2nd 3rd and 4th quarters.
YOU LIED YET AGAIN!!!!

in fact, throughout the entire season, Osborne routinely played the 3rd and 4th teams. SO, my advice to you?

STOP LYING AND TROLLING!!!

You do realize that running the power I formation requires two tailbacks right?

You also did know that Ahman Green had more carries than Nebraska's 3rd, 4th, and 5th tailback on the depth chart COMBINED? Right? What a fraud. :doh: