Re: 2010 QB Stats
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:21 pm
Top QBs often play for really good teams. Fascinating.
#6 and #68. :wink:Sudden Sam wrote:I give. WTF?Goober McTuber wrote:Two of the top 70 are Badgers.
The feeling up here pre-Wilson was that this was an extremely solid team with a gaping hole at QB. I don’t think anyone has seen the offense since Wilson got here, at least I haven’t seen any comments. But there seems to be a significant contingent that believes that Wisconsin is not only the odds-on favorite to win the Big10, but that they belong in the national title discussion. The only thing that gives me pause is Bielema’s game management skills.Sudden Sam wrote:Fucker.
Why didn't you say '2 Badgers in the top 68'?
In all seriousness, what's the feeling about Wilson up there? How's the offense looking with him?
Sudden Sam wrote:It's a shame you lost Clay.
You guys (my yankee impression) could be this year's Auburn. A one-year wonder boy at QB takes you straight to the top!
That's because he was soft.Sudden Sam wrote:Too bad you lost Clay. And he went undrafted!
That, and the fact that RBs are not seen as high value first round picks much anymore. Teams figure that they can pick up a decent RB in the middle rounds. Clay definitely had injury issues with his ankles, probably due to carrying too much weight.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:That's because he was soft.Sudden Sam wrote:Too bad you lost Clay. And he went undrafted!
Wonder boy?Sudden Sam wrote:You guys (my yankee impression) could be this year's Auburn. A one-year wonder boy at QB takes you straight to the top!
Or 0-13, once the NCAA gets done with you.Papa Willie wrote:I'd rather have the balance & be 13-0, thank you.
Yeah Oklahoma didn't have a TB who gained over 1,100 yards last season or anything. If only he could have accomplished getting that whopping 950 yards Auburns best TB got in Dyer. :doh:Papa Willie wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote:http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... ssingYards
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... Touchdowns
Those statistics concern me much more.
Those stats pretty much prove that you don't have much for a running game. I'd rather have the balance & be 13-0, thank you.
Yes but they threw the ball 633 times and only ran it 578 times. You call that balanced?SunCoastSooner wrote:Yeah Oklahoma didn't have a TB who gained over 1,100 yards last season or anything. If only he could have accomplished getting that whopping 950 yards Auburns best TB got in Dyer. :doh:Papa Willie wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote:http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... ssingYards
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... Touchdowns
Those statistics concern me much more.
Those stats pretty much prove that you don't have much for a running game. I'd rather have the balance & be 13-0, thank you.
Goober McTuber wrote:
Sam, Wisconsin doesn't recruit dumbasses. This is the Big 10, not the SEC.
Errrrrr? Errrrrrrr? That's what you have, errrrrrr? You do remember with your limited brain capacity what a TB is and the difference between one and QB is, right?Papa Willie wrote:SunCoastSooner wrote:Yeah Oklahoma didn't have a TB who gained over 1,100 yards last season or anything. If only he could have accomplished getting that whopping 950 yards Auburns best TB got in Dyer. :doh:Papa Willie wrote:Those stats pretty much prove that you don't have much for a running game. I'd rather have the balance & be 13-0, thank you.
Errrrrrrr - Cam ran for well over 1,000 yards, or did you forget that? Besides - where did Auburn end up this past season, and where did OU end up? Just shut the fuck up, stupid. You've been a bitter little cunt all day.
Yeah the useless one is the guy who actually has his degree from the school he roots for and owns his own home and business in the town the other is always bragging about. Congrats on the every five decade title rate there guy.Papa Willie wrote:And how many of those running yards were Cam taking off after going back for a pass? Sucking your own ass much? If you review, you'll also note where I said I was happiest going 13-0. What an insecure and useless fuck you are, dude.SunCoastSooner wrote:
Errrrrr? Errrrrrrr? That's what you have, errrrrrr? You do remember with your limited brain capacity what a TB is and the difference between one and QB is, right?
Basically you ran off at the mouth about how proud you were, and how much you preferred, of having such a more "balanced" offense. Then got exposed as being full of shit. Oklahoma ran an offense that was 52.2/47.8 and had the fifth most balanced offense in the country. By the way Allbarn had a 68.8/31.2 run to pass offense last season and one of the least balanced offenses in the country, moron.
Word coming out of camp is that Wilson looks extremely fabulous. Montee Ball has lost weight and gained strength. Running back position is extremely deep. Offensive line is solid, as always. WR is the question mark.Sudden Sam wrote: In all seriousness, what's the feeling about Wilson up there? How's the offense looking with him?
watch Hawaii much? moniz tends to chuck it from everywhere (including the cheap seats) and the Warriors run game is non-existentSunCoastSooner wrote:http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... ssingYards
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... Touchdowns
Those statistics concern me much more.
You didn't read the exchange between me and spray did you? I was talking about Landry.Felix wrote:watch Hawaii much? moniz tends to chuck it from everywhere (including the cheap seats) and the Warriors run game is non-existentSunCoastSooner wrote:http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... ssingYards
http://espn.go.com/college-football/sta ... Touchdowns
Those statistics concern me much more.
defense is mediocre at best....