Page 1 of 1

So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 2:58 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Did he run himself because he was outed as an IA ST grad fraudulently claiming Iowa 'bode? Or was it because he was stupid enough to post an almost direct link to a photo of his wife? Will he ever have the testicular fortitude to return to this sordid clambake? Or will he just sit at home waiting for a handout from the federal government and write down this 0-10 locks for Week 1?

Serious replies only, please.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:07 pm
by indyfrisco
Maybe he's taking time off to get the tooth fixed.
Image

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:58 pm
by Goober McTuber
He'll pull an m2 and come back under a different nic. Like m2, he'll immediately get busted. Iowa will still suck on general principle.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:34 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
You guys need to stop running all the tards - they are the #1 source of entertainment in this rotting shitbox. At least smackaholic is too thick-headed to get the hint, so he'll be around for awhile.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:24 pm
by PSUFAN
JON, what are you looking at there? Wait - is that a picture of ME with a pancake on my head?
100% lock for Game Over.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:30 pm
by PSUFAN
THEY'RE LAUGHING AT MY FAKE TOOTH?
Lordy.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:07 pm
by R-Jack
Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.

There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:03 am
by PSUFAN
I think it has more to do with running 12 years of flailsmack at fans of the school he did attend.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:29 am
by Killian
R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.

Yeah, your last point.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 4:43 am
by The Seer
How come all you libs are so high on permanent bans? I agree with the sentiment of entertainment value being priority #1.

I say bring back m2, noJ, Dr. Detroit, et.al.....I mean you finally relented on shrubber without too much fallout.

=compassionate conservative

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:54 am
by Dinsdale
You're awfully slow.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=38909

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 12:22 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
The Seer wrote:How come all you libs are so high on permanent bans? I agree with the sentiment of entertainment value being priority #1.

I say bring back m2, noJ, Dr. Detroit, et.al.....I mean you finally relented on shrubber without too much fallout.

=compassionate conservative
What are you talking about? Nobody is banned. You're confusing "was run" with banned.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:04 pm
by Goober McTuber
Dinsdale wrote:You're awfully slow.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=38909
Well, he is carrying 150 extra lbs.


MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:
The Seer wrote:How come all you libs are so high on permanent bans? I agree with the sentiment of entertainment value being priority #1.

I say bring back m2, noJ, Dr. Detroit, et.al.....I mean you finally relented on shrubber without too much fallout.

=compassionate conservative
What are you talking about? Nobody is banned. You're confusing "was run" with banned.
The "Seer" is very easily confused.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 1:59 pm
by Screw_Michigan
R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.

There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them, instead of the product of some Catholic fucking fairy tale you were indoctrinated in when you were young and that you have absolutely no connection to other than people telling you this fairy tale was the end all be all.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:07 pm
by indyfrisco
R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.
He went as far as to say he played intramural football at Iowa on Team Hasselhoff. Dude is a lying poser and he was outed (as he outed his wife/cat/dog/sister). He's a mess.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 2:28 pm
by R-Jack
Screw_Michigan wrote:If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them,
If Stanford offered me anything scholastically, I'd probably think less of them.

So Jon tried to pass himself off as an actual allum in the past in addition to saying he played a little there? Well there you go. Didn't know that part.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 5:22 pm
by indyfrisco
Papa Willie wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:You're awfully slow.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=38909
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:



Proof that I certainly don't read all of every thread! :D
Well, you owe Dins a thank you for linking you up as that was a thread NOT to miss.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:26 pm
by indyfrisco
Papa Willie wrote:Correct - thanks to him, and Screwy as well - he pm'd me. Poor Jon. Dang. He sometimes brought up some decent football takes, but now... Oh well.
He'll be back week 1. He's just lurking now. Too ashamed to show his face. Not sure why (aside from the ISU stuff). Other than his faggoty hairdo, he's a normal looking dude who married up. He has his faults (black tooth, cat ownership, ISU, twin sister that looks like a dude, etc.), but don't we all? I mean, I'm ashamed of my chipping ability on the course, or lack thereof. We can all do better.

He'll be back. This is his crack.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 7:29 pm
by indyfrisco
Sudden Sam wrote:And the JONsense nic is great. Who originated that?
Not sure where that lexicon came from, but the search feature picks up Adelpiero first using it in 2008.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 8:37 pm
by PSUFAN
JONsense...was that Waz? Indy? M Club? Me?

At any rate, JON will be back. My sig box won't be the same until he is.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2011 9:43 pm
by The Seer
Goober McTuber wrote: What are you talking about? Nobody is banned. You're confusing "was run" with banned.
The "Seer" is very easily confused.[/quote]

Never even opened that thread in the CFB forum until now....

So yes, I was barking at windmills....

revel in it.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:22 am
by Killian
Screw_Michigan wrote:
R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.

There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them, instead of the product of some Catholic fucking fairy tale you were indoctrinated in when you were young and that you have absolutely no connection to other than people telling you this fairy tale was the end all be all.
Excellent take as usual, mouth breather. Update your spreadsheet, it wasn't an accounting scholarship.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:50 pm
by PSUFAN
bwahahaha

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Sat Aug 13, 2011 2:52 pm
by Carson
The internet wrecks another home.

If she really is with a legal group, we're all getting summoned.

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2011 3:44 am
by Killian
Carson wrote:The internet wrecks another home.

If she really is with a legal group, we're all getting summoned.
For what, her husband being dumber than clownshit?

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:06 am
by Atomic Punk
:dins: How many times do you see an attractive face but you don't see the lower half? :dins:

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:06 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
PSUFAN wrote:I think it has more to do with running 12 years of flailsmack at fans of the school he did attend.
^^^ This.
Killian wrote:
Screw_Michigan wrote:
R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.

There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them, instead of the product of some Catholic fucking fairy tale you were indoctrinated in when you were young and that you have absolutely no connection to other than people telling you this fairy tale was the end all be all.
Excellent take as usual, mouth breather. Update your spreadsheet, it wasn't an accounting scholarship.
Not to mention that he responded to R-Jack, not you.

Fwiw, I wanted to go to ND badly enough that I accepted a NROTC scholarship to pay for it, because it was the only way I could afford it, even though spending four years in the Navy was not my first choice after graduation.

As to the topic at hand, I think NOJ will be back, although perhaps not right away. As embarrassing as this no doubt is for him, other posters here have returned after more embarrassing moments (sup, AP).

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:55 pm
by Dinsdale
IndyFrisco wrote:This is his crack.

A nice one, too -- what gym does he go to?

Sin,
KCScott

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:16 pm
by indyfrisco
*update*

Who is ready for the major cleavage shot?

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:36 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Are you seriously asking a bunch of dudes if they are 'ready' to see tits?

Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:11 pm
by indyfrisco
Atomic Punk wrote::dins: How many times do you see an attractive face but you don't see the lower half? :dins:
Talk about a blind squirrel and a nut...