T1B

leftist chants about dramatically changing the way we live based on experts evaluations of computer models that could happen to the earth in 80 years (global warming etc).....yet the experts got Irene wrong with a much smaller 24 hour window....

The Seer wrote:leftist chants about dramatically changing the way we live based on experts evaluations of computer models that could happen to the earth in 80 years (global warming etc).....yet the experts got Irene wrong with a much smaller 24 hour window....

Link?

Mikey wrote:

The Seer wrote:leftist chants about dramatically changing the way we live based on experts evaluations of computer models that could happen to the earth in 80 years (global warming etc).....yet the experts got Irene wrong with a much smaller 24 hour window....

Link?

Mikey wrote:Link?

The Seer wrote:the experts got Irene wrong with a much smaller 24 hour window....

Not enough biblical level destruction for you?


It hit exactly when and where they said it would... and they called it at least 5 days in advance, not 24 hours.

War Wagon wrote: It hit exactly when and where they said it would... and they called it at least 5 days in advance, not 24 hours.

Are you naive or stupid? Days before it hit "weather experts" were claiming it could be the storm of the century, category 3, etc. etc . etc.....they DIDN'T KNOW.

That's my point Einstein.

http://www.usatoday.com/weather/storms/ ... 50140902/1

The Seer wrote: Days before it hit "weather experts" were claiming it could be the storm of the century, category 3, etc. etc . etc.....they DIDN'T KNOW.

So it lost intensity after it hit land, it well may not have. It's called preparing for the worst. As it was, 24 people died, millions lost power and were affected by flooding. Property damge in the billion$

I don't know how much more you expect out of weather forecasters than to be able to pinpoint exactly when and where a storm will hit. You want to know precisely what the wind speed and barometric pressure is going to be and God help them if they get it the least bit wrong, you'll run around calling them quacks.

Idiot.

War Wagon wrote:As it was, 24 people died,

War Wagon wrote: So it lost intensity after it hit land, it well may not have. It's called preparing for the worst.

They were right to prepare for the worst, due to not being able to determine with ANY certainty, the strength or intensity of that storm due to insufficient data. Yet, a bunch of scientists are able to tell us now what will happen in 80 years and we should all start changing our behavior....

You really think meterologists are the ones predicting climate change?

I'd say you need to change your behavior, but that's just because you're coming off like a fucking moron.

The Seer wrote:

War Wagon wrote: So it lost intensity after it hit land, it well may not have. It's called preparing for the worst.

They were right to prepare for the worst, due to not being able to determine with ANY certainty, the strength or intensity of that storm due to insufficient data. Yet, a bunch of scientists are able to tell us now what will happen in 80 years and we should all start changing our behavior....

Apples and oranges... I'm not down with the man made global warming/climate change fruitcakes.

But as far as Irene was concerned, they nailed it. A little sensationalism and hysteria goes a long way towards saving lives. It could have been much worse

Also, enough of this nonsense about the Earth rotating the Sun.

Phooey...

All the science you need is in Scripture anyway. Science can go to hell.

R-Jack wrote:You really think meterologists are the ones predicting climate change?

No, they never have opined about the subject. :doh:

Maybe you (think) they study meteors?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2009 ... storms.htm

I guess preparing for "the worst", or at least being prepared for "not the best", in the long term doesn't make sense, even though it does in the short term?

Not quite following the logic there.

The Seer wrote:

War Wagon wrote: It hit exactly when and where they said it would... and they called it at least 5 days in advance, not 24 hours.

Are you naive or stupid? Days before it hit "weather experts" were claiming it could be the storm of the century

it could have been

Mikey wrote:Not quite following the logic there.

what else is new?

Bizzarofelice wrote:

The Seer wrote:

War Wagon wrote: It hit exactly when and where they said it would... and they called it at least 5 days in advance, not 24 hours.

Are you naive or stupid? Days before it hit "weather experts" were claiming it could be the storm of the century

it could have been

And your aunt could have had balls.

This whole thing was pumped up because:

A. It was happening to the east coast and

B. Commander Odowngrade was looking to do battle with the elements to display "leadership" for his hordes of sphincter sucking sycophants.

For most of Vermont, it not only was the storm of the century, it was an all timer.

I understand your antipathy towards Obama, but there's no need to assign ulterior motives to the media. They would've covered it exactly the same no matter the current resident.

mvscal wrote: And your aunt could have had balls.

I have a couple Aunts who are candidates for this.

A. It was happening to the east coast and

B. Commander Odowngrade was looking to do battle with the elements to display "leadership" for his hordes of sphincter sucking sycophants.

The weather was overhyped beause... that's how the media gets you to pay attention. If there was too much weather coverage, its probably becuase there was nothing else going on and you watch too much TV.

Trying to make this about Obama shows how obsessive you are. Need to take the next exit and maybe follow along with America on the access road for a while.

Bizzarofelice wrote:

mvscal wrote: And your aunt could have had balls.

I have a couple Aunts who are candidates for this.

A. It was happening to the east coast and

B. Commander Odowngrade was looking to do battle with the elements to display "leadership" for his hordes of sphincter sucking sycophants.

The weather was overhyped beause... that's how the media gets you to pay attention. If there was too much weather coverage, its probably becuase there was nothing else going on and you watch too much TV.

Trying to make this about Obama shows how obsessive you are. Need to take the next exit and maybe follow along with America on the access road for a while.

Don't forget that Obama controls the media. His, after all, all powerful, omnipotent and stuff.

mvscal wrote:B. Commander Odowngrade was looking to do battle with the elements to display "leadership" for his hordes of sphincter sucking sycophants.

Melt on, faggot.

Mikey wrote: Don't forget that Obama controls the media.

The white half of him is a Jew?



Anyway, FOX News was wall-to-wall hurricane so you know it wasn't at Obama's behest.

I hope whoever is in charge of FEMA does a heckuva job.

Bizzarofelice wrote:Anyway, FOX News was wall-to-wall hurricane so you know it wasn't at Obama's behest.

So was MSNBC, TWC, and CNN.

Did you have a point you were trying to make or did you just want to let us know you watch FOX?

War Wagon wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:Anyway, FOX News was wall-to-wall hurricane so you know it wasn't at Obama's behest.

So was MSNBC, TWC, and CNN.

Did you have a point you were trying to make or did you just want to let us know you watch FOX?

Bace was just pointing out that...







...oh, forget it.

War Wagon wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:Anyway, FOX News was wall-to-wall hurricane so you know it wasn't at Obama's behest.

So was MSNBC, TWC, and CNN.

Did you have a point you were trying to make or did you just want to let us know you watch FOX?

1) reread the thread

2) thank me for being gentle with you

Bizzarofelice wrote:

The Seer wrote:

War Wagon wrote: It hit exactly when and where they said it would... and they called it at least 5 days in advance, not 24 hours.

Are you naive or stupid? Days before it hit "weather experts" were claiming it could be the storm of the century

it could have been

Could of been

wait... they don't do that on this bored, do they? Intentionally, I mean

I can just picture Wags now...drunkenly knocking over his beer can...watching the pool of foam creeping towards his mouse and then excitedly leaping from his chair so fast, that he trips over his own feet and falls backwards on the floor...his wife calls out from the den, "Honey, is everything okay?"...

Comedy Gold.

btw, MSNBC had the most watchable and thorough coverage and here's a Trivia question for you asshats... no fair googling.

What's the difference between a hurricane, a typhoon, and a cyclone?

I've got 10 bucks says 9 of 10 of you don't know unless you google it.

The 1/10 of you most likely to know w/o searching would be Goobs... he'll be along at 7 am to confirm this, no doubt.

Martyred wrote:I can just picture Wags now...drunkenly knocking over his beer can...

Speaking of shaky pedestals one likes to place oneself on...

I've never spilled a drop.

War Wagon wrote:btw, MSNBC had the most watchable and thorough coverage and here's a Trivia question for you asshats... no fair googling.

What's the difference between a hurricane, a typhoon, and a cyclone?

I've got 10 bucks says 9 of 10 of you don't know unless you google it.

The 1/10 of you most likely to know w/o searching would be Goobs... he'll be along at 7 am to confirm this, no doubt.

hurricane has rum in it, Cyclone is the best pinbal game of all time and a typhoon comes when the pad thai is four days old

War Wagon wrote:
I've never spilled a drop.

good cause that's a sin

War Wagon wrote:What's the difference between a hurricane, a typhoon, and a cyclone?

Hurricanes are on the East coast, typhoons on the West and cyclones out in Asia?

War Wagon wrote:What's the difference between a hurricane, a typhoon, and a cyclone?

hurricane = probation
cyclone = iowa fans
typhoon = natural disaster

Bizzarofelice wrote: hurricane has rum in it, Cyclone is the best pinbal game of all time and a typhoon comes when the pad thai is four days old

Huh....you really DID know...

Screw_Michigan wrote:

War Wagon wrote:What's the difference between a hurricane, a typhoon, and a cyclone?

Hurricanes are on the East coast, typhoons on the West and cyclones out in Asia?

honest effort. and while I'm quite sure 88 did know this off the top of his head, I hate spoiling Goobs thunder, no wait... I like doing that.

hurricanes start in the Atlantic ocean, typhoons in the Pacific and cyclones in the Indian.

Mikey wrote:Don't forget that Obama controls the media.

How could I? You need a raincoat once their legs get to tinglin'.

Cuda wrote:

Bizzarofelice wrote:
it could have been

Could of been

wait... they don't do that on this bored, do they? Intentionally, I mean

More of the Cud's english? Priceless.

And another one gets poleaxed by the grammar smack boomerang.

War Wagon wrote:btw, MSNBC had the most watchable and thorough coverage and here's a Trivia question for you asshats... no fair googling.

What's the difference between a hurricane, a typhoon, and a cyclone?

I've got 10 bucks says 9 of 10 of you don't know unless you google it.

The 1/10 of you most likely to know w/o searching would be Goobs... he'll be along at 7 am to confirm this, no doubt.

Hurricane - What you call a tropical low pressure system with sustained winds over 75 mph in the Atlantic and in the Pacific east of the International Date Line.

Typhoon - What you call a tropical low pressure system with sustained winds over 75 mph in teh Pacific west of the International Date Line

Cyclone - Same shit, only in the Indian Ocean

Marty wrote:All the science you need is in Scripture anyway. Science can go to hell.

I knew you'd come around.


:wink: