Page 1 of 2
Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:00 am
by bradhusker
Well, today we learned that Peyton Manning's streak will indeed come to an end this coming sunday. Which got me to thinking just how incredible Brett Favre's Iron Man streak really is, and even though I am impressed with Lou Gherig and Cal Ripken's Iron Man streaks as well, Ive got to give the nod to Brett Favre.
And believe me, ive thought long and hard about this, and its the only conclusion that makes sense.
Baseball is a great sport, BUT, at the end of the day, it is a non-violent sport. There is no way of getting around that simple fact. Sure it takes great skill to play baseball day in and day out for 16 straight seasons and some 2100 plus games. BUT, to play in the NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, for some 20 seasons, NEVER missing a game, in an extremely VIOLENT sport, where men as large 300 plus pounds physically come at you and smash you to the hard and unforgiving turf, FRIENDS, thats extraordinary, to say the least.
Especially at the QB position where a guy like Brett gets sacked and roughed up on a game by game basis. Peyton, really didnt get punished as much as Favre did, so its fitting that his streak came to an end some 6 seasons before Brett's did.
I submit to you, that the NFL is an extremely violent game, a game where concussions are the norm, and injury is commonplace.
SO, in short, as much as I admire Cal's iron man streak, I must respecfully give the nod to FAVRE. Feel free to dis-agree, HOWEVER, I will hand you your ass here.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:11 am
by Bizzarofelice
games played streak records are soooooooooooooo overrated
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:20 am
by Mikey
WGARA
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:27 am
by poptart
'tardhusker wrote:Baseball is a great sport, BUT, at the end of the day, it is a non-violent sport. There is no way of getting around that simple fact. Sure it takes great skill to play baseball day in and day out for 16 straight seasons and some 2100 plus games
I remember the awards ceremony at the end my first year of high school.
Some senior chick (about a 3) got a special award - for making it all the way from kindergarten through 12th grade - without missing a day of school.
Never missed.
Bravo!
She was, well... YaFJ would have done her.
Anyway, toss in a few more years, and yeah, there's your Ripken baseball streak.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:45 am
by bradhusker
Bizzarofelice wrote:games played streak records are soooooooooooooo overrated
overrated? could you last 20 seasons being knocked around and tackled by 300 pound gorillas? Whats your sport? badmitten? ping pong? basket weaving? I bet you dont even wear wrangler jeans or drive a ford pickup. I do. and im here to tell you, Favre is one tough iron man. Aaron Rodgers, the current green bay QB, wont make it halfway to Favre's record, He's already had two concussions, and im willing to wager that his third concussion will be this season.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 4:02 am
by Bucmonkey
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 4:19 am
by R-Jack
bradhusker wrote:could you last 20 seasons being knocked around and tackled by 300 pound gorillas?
HOLY FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~Stanley Fucking Pikkkle~
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:52 am
by mvscal
bradhusker wrote:And believe me, ive thought long and hard about this,
Wow. And with all the other things you think long and hard about. You're just regular fucking thinking machine, aren't you?
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 12:22 pm
by bradhusker
mvscal wrote:bradhusker wrote:And believe me, ive thought long and hard about this,
Wow. And with all the other things you think long and hard about. You're just regular fucking thinking machine, aren't you?
Why yes, I am a deep thinker in the mold of a plato or socrates, or even an issacc newton, HOWEVER, im also quite the athlete as well.
Growing up, I thrived in a multitude of sports, Im one of those rare genetic specimens blessed with brains and brawn BOTH.
People thought I was going to be the next Bobby Fischer! My chess game was that good, I was also a dead eye 3 pt shooter as well, and, I was the guy who could hit a softball over the fence just about every time I came up to the plate.
But I digress, Enough about me, what were your informative years like? From your numerous posts in here, I'd imagine a lot of masturbation, an abnormal un-healthy amount. Am I far off? Work with me here, just how much wasted life are you responsible for?
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 2:18 pm
by R-Jack
bradhusker wrote:Im one of those rare genetic specimens
guy who could hit a softball over the fence
Your examples of your athletic prowess include your beer league softball exploits? C'mon, impress me second coming of Bo Jackson. Tell me about your bowling game.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:32 pm
by BSmack
R-Jack wrote:bradhusker wrote:could you last 20 seasons being knocked around and tackled by 300 pound gorillas?
HOLY FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
~Stanley Fucking Pikkkle~
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:56 pm
by Kansas City Kid
bradhusker wrote:mvscal wrote:bradhusker wrote:And believe me, ive thought long and hard about this,
Wow. And with all the other things you think long and hard about. You're just regular fucking thinking machine, aren't you?
Why yes, I am a deep thinker in the mold of a plato or socrates, or even an issacc newton, HOWEVER, im also quite the athlete as well.
Growing up, I thrived in a multitude of sports, Im one of those rare genetic specimens blessed with brains and brawn BOTH.
People thought I was going to be the next Bobby Fischer! My chess game was that good, I was also a dead eye 3 pt shooter as well, and, I was the guy who could hit a softball over the fence just about every time I came up to the plate.
But I digress, Enough about me, what were your informative years like? From your numerous posts in here, I'd imagine a lot of masturbation, an abnormal un-healthy amount. Am I far off? Work with me here, just how much wasted life are you responsible for?
To say the least, I am great. Casanova's memoirs read like a parish magazine in comparison to my exploits. I make Davinci look like a redneck when you compare his lifestyle to mine. My charm and charisma are the envy of others and are to be emulated. Edison and Einstein would look like children if their works were put side by side with my accomplishments. if the word "EXCELLENT" were written on each and every grain of sand in the desert it would only equal 1/1,000,000,000,000th of the excellent that is me.
With these few thoughts in mind I conclude I am the most magnificent man ever to walk the face of God's green earth.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:26 pm
by bradhusker
Why yes, I am a deep thinker in the mold of a plato or socrates, or even an issacc newton, HOWEVER, im also quite the athlete as well.
Growing up, I thrived in a multitude of sports, Im one of those rare genetic specimens blessed with brains and brawn BOTH.
People thought I was going to be the next Bobby Fischer! My chess game was that good, I was also a dead eye 3 pt shooter as well, and, I was the guy who could hit a softball over the fence just about every time I came up to the plate.
But I digress, Enough about me, what were your informative years like? From your numerous posts in here, I'd imagine a lot of masturbation, an abnormal un-healthy amount. Am I far off? Work with me here, just how much wasted life are you responsible for?[/quote]
To say the least, I am great. Casanova's memoirs read like a parish magazine in comparison to my exploits. I make Davinci look like a redneck when you compare his lifestyle to mine. My charm and charisma are the envy of others and are to be emulated. Edison and Einstein would look like children if their works were put side by side with my accomplishments. if the word "EXCELLENT" were written on each and every grain of sand in the desert it would only equal 1/1,000,000,000,000th of the excellent that is me.
With these few thoughts in mind I conclude I am the most magnificent man ever to walk the face of God's green earth.
[/quote]
Actually? you'd be second, to Elvis Aaron Presley.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:31 pm
by bradhusker
R-Jack wrote:bradhusker wrote:Im one of those rare genetic specimens
guy who could hit a softball over the fence
Your examples of your athletic prowess include your beer league softball exploits? C'mon, impress me second coming of Bo Jackson. Tell me about your bowling game.
Well, I havent picked up a bowling ball in ten years, BUT, when I was younger I was extremely unorthadox, I was a right handed bowler, who threw from the left side, the brooklyn side if you will, and because of my great strength, and massive hands, I had a hard time finding a ball that my fingers would fit thru the holes, meaning, I usually had to throw a very heavy ball, with gigantic holes, thus, when I threw strikes, the pins would explode into the air, and a great thunder sound could be heard thru the entire alley.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2011 8:32 pm
by R-Jack
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:01 am
by smackaholic
favruh's feat of durability is easily more impressive than cal's.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:26 am
by Bizzarofelice
bradhusker wrote:Bizzarofelice wrote:games played streak records are soooooooooooooo overrated
overrated? could you last 20 seasons being knocked around and tackled by 300 pound gorillas?
good times
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:27 am
by bradhusker
smackaholic wrote:favruh's feat of durability is easily more impressive than cal's.
thanks smack, great minds do indeed think alike. Im not too sad at the peyton manning news, because I didnt want him catching or breaking Favre's streak or all time passing records.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 4:40 am
by R-Jack
bradhusker wrote:thanks smack, great minds do indeed think alike.
Smackaholic might be the second stupidest motherfucker on these boards. If you were not nudging ahead of him, I'd say tell me you knew.
I didnt want him catching or breaking Favre's streak or all time passing records.
No matter what, you can rest easy that 4th and inches on a camera phone's INT record will remain intact.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 5:08 am
by bradhusker
R-Jack wrote:bradhusker wrote:thanks smack, great minds do indeed think alike.
Smackaholic might be the second stupidest motherfucker on these boards. If you were not nudging ahead of him, I'd say tell me you knew.
I didnt want him catching or breaking Favre's streak or all time passing records.
No matter what, you can rest easy that 4th and inches on a camera phone's INT record will remain intact.
first of all, that wasnt favre's cock, according to my credible sources, his phone was hacked by a disgruntled jets employee.
second, Favre wasnt responsible for the vikings loss to the saints two years ago in the NFC title game. THAT responsibility lies directly on that LOSER brad childress. NO coach worth his salt, would allow there to be 12 men on the field, when you are already in FG range with the super bowl on the line.
That would NEVER happen to ANY decent head coach. which is why childress is unemployed. Sure favre threw the INT, BUT, the vikes were already in FG range, GAME OVER, yet childress had no control over his own team, so, in short, the blame falls squarely on childress.
again, with seconds remaining, the vikes had longwell in a dome to end the game, the saints had no prayer, except for the fact that childress was a loser coach who allowed 12 men on the field and got taken out of FG range. With the super bowl on the line, NO coach would have let that happen, BUT, I dont expect you to fully wrap your brain around that.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:12 am
by Terry in Crapchester
bradhusker wrote:Why yes, I am a deep thinker in the mold of a plato or socrates, or even an issacc newton, HOWEVER, im also quite the athlete as well.
Growing up, I thrived in a multitude of sports, Im one of those rare genetic specimens blessed with brains and brawn BOTH.
People thought I was going to be the next Bobby Fischer! My chess game was that good, I was also a dead eye 3 pt shooter as well, and, I was the guy who could hit a softball over the fence just about every time I came up to the plate.
But I digress, Enough about me, what were your informative years like? From your numerous posts in here, I'd imagine a lot of masturbation, an abnormal un-healthy amount. Am I far off? Work with me here, just how much wasted life are you responsible for?
To say the least, I am great. Casanova's memoirs read like a parish magazine in comparison to my exploits. I make Davinci look like a redneck when you compare his lifestyle to mine. My charm and charisma are the envy of others and are to be emulated. Edison and Einstein would look like children if their works were put side by side with my accomplishments. if the word "EXCELLENT" were written on each and every grain of sand in the desert it would only equal 1/1,000,000,000,000th of the excellent that is me.
With these few thoughts in mind I conclude I am the most magnificent man ever to walk the face of God's green earth.
[/quote]
Actually? you'd be second, to Elvis Aaron Presley.[/quote]
We'll never know for sure, of course, but I'm willing to go out on a limb and venture a guess that if Socrates, Plato or Sir Isaac Newton were alive today, they'd at least be able to master the concept of UBB.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:12 pm
by R-Jack
bradhusker wrote: With the super bowl on the line, NO coach would have let that happen, BUT, I dont expect you to fully wrap your brain around that.
I get where you're coming from, except for the fact that it had absolutely nothing to do with my comment about Favre being the career INT leader.
It's obvious that the whole Childress thing was something you needed to get off your chest, context of conversation be damned. I hope you feel a little better. Are there any other random issues you need to melt down over before I trots another shit thread?
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 2:35 pm
by bradhusker
R-Jack wrote:bradhusker wrote: With the super bowl on the line, NO coach would have let that happen, BUT, I dont expect you to fully wrap your brain around that.
I get where you're coming from, except for the fact that it had absolutely nothing to do with my comment about Favre being the career INT leader.
It's obvious that the whole Childress thing was something you needed to get off your chest, context of conversation be damned. I hope you feel a little better. Are there any other random issues you need to melt down over before I trots another shit thread?
YES!!! as a lifelong vikings fan, that was one of the greatest dissapointments of my life, im still not over it, I dont blame favre though, any man who can get hit and take a beating like that, and still come back for more? NO, the blame squarely rests on that idiot coach, who allowed 12 men on the field, WHEN the super bowl is on the line, you do whatever it takes to stay in FG range, even if it means going with only ten men.
as for the INT record? You should understand, its not the total amount that is important, its the interception percentage which matters most. Which is why terry bradshaw is a shit QB compared to favre.
If you knew about what makes a QB great, you would know that.
Compared with the amount of pass attempts for a career, we look at the int pct. it tells you the whole story.
Just like completion percentage is more important than overall completions. Favre did throw a lot of int's, because he was a risk taker, its part of his "gunslinger" persona. However, he also was an accurate passer who threw a lot of td's as well.
At the end of the day, Dan marino with his zero super bowls is ten times better at QB then terry bradshaw will ever dream of being.
If you dont know this, then you dont know squat about big time NFL football.
For years, idiots love to talk about terry bradshaw with his four superbowl trophies, and put him amongst the top ten qb's of all time. YET, to knowledgeable football gurus such as myself, bradshaw doesnt even show up in my top twenty.
Bradshaw was surrounded by 14 hall of famers on BOTH sides of the ball, that was his good fortune. OVERALL, in spite of the talent, his accuracy sucked, and he was just decent at best. and, his int percentage was very high. He wasnt durable, so he didnt last as long as favre. IN short, I view bradshaw as a fuckin pussy.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:05 pm
by smackaholic
bradhusker wrote:first of all, that wasnt favre's cock, according to my credible sources, his phone was hacked by a disgruntled jets employee.
i saw we give husker the benefit of the doubt on this one. he don't know much, but, i bet he does know favruh's cahk when he sees it.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:15 pm
by bradhusker
smackaholic wrote:bradhusker wrote:first of all, that wasnt favre's cock, according to my credible sources, his phone was hacked by a disgruntled jets employee.
i saw we give husker the benefit of the doubt on this one. he don't know much, but, i bet he does know favruh's cahk when he sees it.
the cock in question, the one texted by a disgruntled hacker piece of shit? that was a small cock, Favre and I have huge cocks, so, yes, its the wrong cock, CAN we please talk about something else besides COCK???
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:36 pm
by War Wagon
bradhusker wrote:
Well, I havent picked up a bowling ball in ten years, BUT, when I was younger I was extremely unorthadox, I was a right handed bowler, who threw from the left side, the brooklyn side if you will
You throw what's known as a backup ball, which is unusual but not unheard of. I once bowled in league with a gal who threw one helluva' backup ball. She damn near had a perfect game one night, wound up with a 296. She averaged about 180.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:48 pm
by smackaholic
War Wagon wrote:bradhusker wrote:
Well, I havent picked up a bowling ball in ten years, BUT, when I was younger I was extremely unorthadox, I was a right handed bowler, who threw from the left side, the brooklyn side if you will
You throw what's known as a backup ball, which is unusual but not unheard of. I once bowled in league with a gal who threw one helluva' backup ball. She damn near had a perfect game one night, wound up with a 296. She averaged about 180.
backup balls are actually fairly common....among women and faggots.
another possibility is he throws a proper curve, but is using a very inside line which would have him throwing the ball from the left side of the lane. not sure what exactly he means by "brooklyn". brooklyn in bowling lingo has nothing to do with whether you are right or left handed. it means hitting the wrong side of the head pin and still getting a strike. a "brooklyn" strike for a right hander is when he hits the left side or 1-2 pocket. for a leftie, it would mean hitting the 1-3 pocket.
sin,
smackaholic, bowling/civics test expert
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:18 pm
by bradhusker
smackaholic wrote:War Wagon wrote:bradhusker wrote:
Well, I havent picked up a bowling ball in ten years, BUT, when I was younger I was extremely unorthadox, I was a right handed bowler, who threw from the left side, the brooklyn side if you will
You throw what's known as a backup ball, which is unusual but not unheard of. I once bowled in league with a gal who threw one helluva' backup ball. She damn near had a perfect game one night, wound up with a 296. She averaged about 180.
backup balls are actually fairly common....among women and faggots.
another possibility is he throws a proper curve, but is using a very inside line which would have him throwing the ball from the left side of the lane. not sure what exactly he means by "brooklyn". brooklyn in bowling lingo has nothing to do with whether you are right or left handed. it means hitting the wrong side of the head pin and still getting a strike. a "brooklyn" strike for a right hander is when he hits the left side or 1-2 pocket. for a leftie, it would mean hitting the 1-3 pocket.
sin,
smackaholic, bowling/civics test expert
I throw hard strikes smackie boy, if you bowl with me smack, my strikes are so thunderous, it would rattle your teeth down ur throat, just like nebraska would run the rock down your teams throat.
smashmouth style, smackie boy, Im new york city born and raised, so ive forgotten more about brooklyn then you'll ever dream of knowing about.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:54 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Who was the Minnesota DE that played like 280 something games? More impressive than Wrangler jean boy.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:08 pm
by smackaholic
alan page?
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:14 pm
by smackaholic
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Who was the Minnesota DE that played like 280 something games? More impressive than Wrangler jean boy.
Both are extremely impressive, but, i think a QB doing it is more impressive. And the fukking wrangler commercial came on as i type this!
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:38 pm
by Y2K
This thread is like a horrible Dos Equis commercial.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 12:29 pm
by bradhusker
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Who was the Minnesota DE that played like 280 something games? More impressive than Wrangler jean boy.
I think it was Jim Marshall, BUT, its not as nearly impressive as Favre. A QB is the one taking the punishment, not dishing it out ya fool.
cant ur pea brain comphrehend that?
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 3:40 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
bradhusker wrote:I think it was Jim Marshall, BUT, its not as nearly impressive as Favre. A QB is the one taking the punishment, not dishing it out ya fool.
A qb will take some shots but a guy in the trenches will face contact on every single down, increasing his chances of injuring something.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:19 pm
by bradhusker
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:bradhusker wrote:I think it was Jim Marshall, BUT, its not as nearly impressive as Favre. A QB is the one taking the punishment, not dishing it out ya fool.
A qb will take some shots but a guy in the trenches will face contact on every single down, increasing his chances of injuring something.
WRONG ANSWER, BUZZER, thanks for playing though.
A big giant defensive end is the guy who is doing the manhandling dumbass!! He is causing bodily injury you simpleton.
Sure he is pushing and shoving and tackling on most every down, HOWEVER, he is the enforcer, In Favre's situation, he is THE TARGET most every play, and, Favre isnt one to shy away from it either, ive seen him block downfield on many occaisions.
Many times the QB faces blind side tackles, THERE IS NO COMPARISON, blind side hits and too many sacks to count. Its not even close you simple minded fairy.
This is why Favre's 20 year streak is so fuckin amazing, he was THE TARGET for 300 pound gorillas, you completely stupid moron you.
The defensive gorilla is nobodys target, he is THE ENFORCER you shit for brains sissy.
man, I love handing you your lilly white ass, its so damm easy.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:30 pm
by bradhusker
Papa Willie wrote:bradhusker wrote:MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Who was the Minnesota DE that played like 280 something games? More impressive than Wrangler jean boy.
I think it was Jim Marshall, BUT, its not as nearly impressive as Favre. A QB is the one taking the punishment, not dishing it out ya fool.
cant ur pea brain comphrehend that?
It was Jim Marshall. BUT - you have to think about something. Though a quarterback can (and does) get hammered several times a day, the majority of the time he's in, he doesn't even touch anybody else - other than touching the center's ass or handing the ball off to the RB. A defensive lineman is getting slapped and hit on EVERY single play he's in, so Marshall's record may
easily be the most impressive...
As a person, Cal is seemingly nails. No wishy-washy shit like Favre.
I feel I should give Cal the nod - simply because I trenched his front yard in a car.
DUDE? let me ask you something? are you OUT OF YOUR FREAKIN MIND??? Brett Favre runs downfield to make blocks!! Ive seen him do this in the 09 season when he was already 40 years old!!!! Ive seen Brett Favre play with multiple fractures in his foot!! If you had multiple fractures, you would be home for weeks from your job at the payless shoestore.
You are getting your ass kicked by me in this discussion!! The new orleans saints hit Brett late on several occaisions during the 09 championship game. After the whistle was blown, they illegally hit favre, AND YOU KNOW WHAT? The 40 year old came back for more!!!! And a pink fairy sissy like you is gonna try to paint a different picture of favre than what I just did?
I DONT THINK SO MORON!! THE entire world saw Brett come back into that game, THE MAN took more hits over 20 years than anybody. AT 40, dan marino was crippled, at 40 joe montanna was done, his body couldnt take it anymore. NOT FAVRE, Favre is the toughest son of a bitch in league history. When Jim marshall had fractures, he sat out, NOT FAVRE.
If you had fractures, there is NO way in hell you would go to your job at payless, you'd call in sick like a wimp. WHAT? you cant stock shoes with a lil' fracture? ya sissy.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:42 pm
by Goober McTuber
I like Favre. He was the 2nd best QB the Packers ever had. Soon to be 3rd best, though.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:34 pm
by bradhusker
Goober McTuber wrote:I like Favre. He was the 2nd best QB the Packers ever had. Soon to be 3rd best, though.
BUZZER!!!!!
sorry goobie, but, WRONG ANSWER! bart starr wasnt half the QB brett was, and, AARON rodgers? he's already had two concussions, SO, guesss what? one more, and he is toast. AND, that concussion will come sooner than later.
mark it down, and take it to the bank, rodgers career wont last half as long as favre. One more concussion and sissy boy aron is done.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:57 pm
by smackaholic
mgoo makes a good point. giant linemen smashing into one another and getting tangled up as they go down is a recipe for all sorts of knee/ankle injuries. getting blindsided might hurt like hell, but, it generally does not cause the type of injury that will keep a QB from suiting up the next week.
so maybe linemen playing streaks are more impressive than QB streaks. i suppose there are some sort of injury stats that will show which is more impressive. anyone in the nfl going that many games in a row is impressive. rack favruh and marshall.
my vote for number one badass dude in the nfl is walter peyton. running the ball as hard as he did for as long as he did without missing a game is just amazing. toughest mofo to ever suit up in the nfl.
Re: Ripken or Favre?
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 12:07 pm
by bradhusker
OK, im the bag, BUT, you are the SHIT inside the fuckin bag, you troll, Marshall is the guy doing the hitting, you complete fool, YOUR TINY BRAIN cant seem to understand this simple fact, MARSHALL is the enforcer making the contact, which means that he is less likely to suffer pain than a QB who gets sacked and physically knocked down on his ass. Marshall is the guy who knocks people on their ass, rarely will a defensive end get pushed around, most of the time, its the defensive end who is doing the bullying. Why do you think its Qb's who suffer concussions? Not defensive ends like marshall, they are the ones who DISH out the concussions, you shit-for-brains dummy moron you.
Qb 's dont see much action according to you? YET they are the number one position for concussions you panty waste of a life you.
do you know how serious a concussion is? Ask Jim mcmahon? the former Qb for the chicago bears, have you talked to him lately? the guy sounds like a retarded band camp leader who gives blow jobs to tuba players.
QB's take more punishment than anyone, no position gets serious concussions like they do. you fart face fuck.
