So tired

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:29 pm

Of this loser. Norv Turner. Game after game, year after year. 1/2 yard to go and this losers team can't even score a point or 6. I hate these asshole biased announcers also. Anyone wonder why people hate Tom Brady? No humbleness whatsoever. Norv Turner needs to be fired. Frickin loser. Same thing every year and they bring him back.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:40 pm

What's to hate about Tom Brady? He's got his looks, cayshe, trophy wife, and one of the best QB's around. I can imagine him not looking at fat, drunken chicks that wish they had a shot to be with him... and that they stand no chance and all. But hey, good for that dude for what he has...

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:47 pm

The fact that he two sons the same age and one he doesn't acknowledge for starters. And how about that little cheating scandle awhile back? Oh, and the smug attitude needs to go... He would not get a second look from most chicks, if not for the QB fame.

But hey, he can sleep at night.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:55 pm

The only reason Norv is still around is because the Chargers owners, the Spanos, are perfectly happy if the team finishes 8-8 or better. So for them, last seasons 9-7 record was success. Even though they didn't make the playoffs........

Norv sucks, Marty sucked, but compared to who else they've had for HC (minus Bobby Ross), these guys are great.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:09 pm

trev wrote:The fact that he two sons the same age and one he doesn't acknowledge for starters. And how about that little cheating scandle awhile back? Oh, and the smug attitude needs to go... He would not get a second look from most chicks, if not for the QB fame.

But hey, he can sleep at night.

Good looking people, (men & women both) can be pushing baskets in a grocery store parking lot for a living, will get 2nd looks. You've been a "shut-in" for too long.

PB Joe is right BTW. I miss Cass Street Bar & Grill.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:21 pm

So you think Tom Brady is a good looking guy? He doesn't do a thing for me. What kind of underwear do you think he prefers? Do you think he's ever tried on Giselles panties?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:27 pm

trev, you're lying and denying. I'll bet he's wearing Giselle's panties while currently on the field beating the Chargers because she made him do it. He prolly has pics of himself taken by a professional photographer wearing them instead of a shot in a mirror... not that I would know anything about what a hot chick demands.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:41 pm

Pats just went for it on 4th and 4 and did not make it. Pompous asses much? I hate them.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:42 pm

Atomic Punk wrote: I'll bet he's wearing Giselle's panties while currently on the field

You may be right about that.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:04 pm

Belichicks attempt at cheating knows no bounds. They just reviewed our extra point. I guess Bill is stalling for time, like the cheat that he is.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:12 pm

Yeah I'm not watching that on TV right now either.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:18 pm

trev wrote:Of this loser. Norv Turner.

Was Norv out there on the field turning the ball over three times? Was that part of his game plan?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:21 pm

At least Ryan Matthews went head-to-head against the opposing #24 Arrington. Best play of the game.

trev · Post by **trev** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:25 pm

mvscal wrote:
trev wrote:Of this loser. Norv Turner.
Was Norv out there on the field turning the ball over three times? Was that part of his game plan?

No but he seems to set them up for failure. Teams just know what we are going to do. Norv is a loser.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:43 pm

Norv is a Duck -- it's obviously not his fault.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:46 pm

mvscal wrote:
trev wrote:Of this loser. Norv Turner.
Was Norv out there on the field turning the ball over three times? Was that part of his game plan?

Which team seemed more prepared today? Which team executed?

The Chargers have been a cluster fuck at the start of every season Norv has been HC, and nothing has changed, except a terrible Viking team stumbled into San Diego last week.

Norv sucks ass.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:02 am

Last Charger game I bothered to attend was when they played at home against San Fran in a pre-season game. Those two teams ended up playing in the Super Bowl that year. After that, fuck paying to see them live.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:32 am

Joe in PB wrote:Which team seemed more prepared today? Which team executed?

The Bolts were prepared, they just didn't execute. They certainly had their opportunties in easy scoring position and then they made some dumb plays. That's not on the coach. Norv set them up but the players have to make the plays.

And the Hoody did what he does best and that is pick a player and take him completely out the game. Gates was MIA. It's not exactly a disaster to lose a road game at New England. Sure, it would have been nice but, this one was penciled in as an 'L' when the schedule came out.

Breathe deeply...

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:13 am

Some might conclude the Bolts didn't execute because they played like they practice.

And the Hoody did what he does best and that is pick a player and take him completely out the game. Gates was MIA.

That wouldn't have happened before all the foot injuries, when he routinely beat double teams. Gates definitely has lost a step or two.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:37 am

Joe in PB wrote:Some might conclude the Bolts didn't execute because they played like they practice.

And how is that? Do they practice Tolbert not running into the assigned hole then attempting to bounce it outside like he was Barry fucking Sanders or something? Is that how you think Norv drew that one up? Is that what it looked like to you?

Granted you don't expect Vince Wilfork to be dropping into coverage in a zone dog, but he is very large and you have to able to see him out there. I mean seriously...getting picked by Vince the Hutt? C'mon, Philip. WTF?

Credit due, it was a fantastic play by a very athletic fat man.

Gates definitely has lost a step or two.

Why didn't you say that last week when he had 8 catches for 70+ yards? The Gaytriots sold out to stop Gates and dared Vince Jackson to beat them. It worked in the end, but I think there might have been more than a few moments of private doubt while VJ was rampaging through their secondary.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:47 am

trev wrote:Belichicks attempt at cheating knows no bounds. They just reviewed our extra point. I guess Bill is stalling for time, like the cheat that he is.

What does this even mean?

You're a total fucking mess.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:52 am

Why didn't you say that last week when he had 8 catches for 70+ yards?

Yeah that would have made sense. 3 or 4 years ago I noticed LT lost a bit of his burst after his TD record setting season, this is no different. Gates used to routinely beat double teams, that's simply not the case anymore. He'll still produce, much like the Colt WRs with Manning behind the helm, but he's definitely on the wrong side of peak performance.

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:53 am

mvscal, you just said the Hoody outcoached Norv. Thank you. The Pats knew what we were doing all day. Because Norv does the same thing week after week.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:26 pm

trev wrote:Belichicks attempt at cheating knows no bounds. They just reviewed our extra point. I guess Bill is stalling for time, like the cheat that he is.

Any update on where you were going with this shit take... or can we chalk this up as you were completely fucking wasted and just felt like venting as your shit franchise took it in the ass again?

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 3:57 pm

You were at the game. They reviewed our extra point.

It gave Cheat LOTS of extra time. Nothing else to say about this one really. Really? Reviewing an extra point?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 4:00 pm

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
trev wrote:Belichicks attempt at cheating knows no bounds. They just reviewed our extra point. I guess Bill is stalling for time, like the cheat that he is.

Any update on where you were going with this shit take... or can we chalk this up as you were completely fucking wasted and just felt like venting as your shit franchise took it in the ass again?

I would think an aspiring play-by-play announcer would realize that as of the 2011-2012 season, any and all even slightly questionable plays are automatically reviewed.

Regardless, I didn't realize that a replay challenge was "cheating."

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:12 pm

Dinsdale wrote:Regardless, I didn't realize that a replay challenge was "cheating."

Yeah... I just found it to be hilarious that she thought

a.) the replay did NOT come from the booth.
b.) that the replay was for the XP

and not the TD.

Of course... after drinking a liter of Bukoff, it's hard to think rationally.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:29 pm

Our Brave comentatror didn't realize that you can no longer even challenge a scoring play.

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 5:45 pm

The replay was for the extra point. I must have been dreaming. Carry on. Not going to argue with you two.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:17 pm

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:Regardless, I didn't realize that a replay challenge was "cheating."
Yeah... I just found it to be hilarious that she thought

a.) the replay did NOT come from the booth.
b.) that the replay was for the XP and not the TD.

Of course... after drinking a liter of Bukoff, it's hard to think rationally.

I enjoy a drunken hausfrau pile-on as much as the next guy, and I wasn't watching the game at that point, but according to the play-by-play summary, the replay official challenged and reviewed the extra point.

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/playbypla ... 7&period=0

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:18 pm

I didn't know Pete Carroll played the guitar?

Learn something new every day around here.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:31 pm

trev wrote:
mvscal wrote:
trev wrote:Of this loser. Norv Turner.
Was Norv out there on the field turning the ball over three times? Was that part of his game plan?
No but he seems to set them up for failure. Teams just know what we are going to do. Norv is a loser.

..like the 3 man rush against the games finest surgeon. I could find an open receiver with all the time Brady had yesterday. You would think after he carved them up in the first half that Norv would make an adjustment....wrong, the front 3 were gassed by half time, yet the second half was a mirror of the first. Brady sitting in a rocking chair trying to figure out which of the 4 receivers would break open first. Unfriggin exceptable! The only way to beat Brady is pressure as it is with most elite QB's. We'll be 4-1 going into our bye week and it won't mean a friggin thing cause' Norv doesn't know how to plan for an opponent, he just does the same thing every week...blow him out before it's too late. Joe and I remember the days of Bobby Ross, now there was a coach! oh, but management couldn't pull his strings so they railroaded him out pn the midnight special.

Joe in PB · Post by **Joe in PB** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:00 pm

The only way to beat Brady is pressure as it is with most elite QB's.

Excellent take. Detroit actually blue printed how to pressure Brady in the pre-season, right up the middle. Of course the Lions have Ndamukong Suh and Nick Fairley, two of the reasons why I see much improvement on their team. The Chargers should have dialed up some exotic blitz packages going between the tackles (the main strength of the 34 D vs the pass) to mix things up a bit, as opposed to letting Brady choose which ever open receiver was deeper down field.

The Chargers got whipped from coaching, to player execution, NE was the better team.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:19 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:I enjoy a drunken hausfrau pile-on as much as the next guy, and I wasn't watching the game at that point, but according to the play-by-play summary, the replay official challenged and reviewed the extra point.

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/playbypla ... 7&period=0

I was at the game. I am fairly certain the review was for the TD here:

http://www.nfl.com/player/vincentjackso ... 00/profile

He caught in with one hand and there was definitely a question as to whether or not the ball hit the ground. There is NO way they reviewed the XP and not the TD play. Was the review after the XP? Sure...

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:45 pm

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:I enjoy a drunken hausfrau pile-on as much as the next guy, and I wasn't watching the game at that point, but according to the play-by-play summary, the replay official challenged and reviewed the extra point.

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/playbypla ... 7&period=0

I was at the game. I am fairly certain the review was for the TD here:

http://www.nfl.com/player/vincentjackso ... 00/profile

He caught in with one hand and there was definitely a question as to whether or not the ball hit the ground. There is NO way they reviewed the XP and not the TD play. Was the review after the XP? Sure...

You were at the game. You were probably drunk. I'm just going by the play-by-play at espn.com. They indicate the challenge on the line with the XP. If the challenge is for the TD, they list it on that line. Or it could be that the intern at ESPN who formatted the play-by-play was every bit as drunk as you and Trev.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:03 pm

Now you are projecting. I didn't drink alcohol yesterday.

Maybe the replay dude was taking a shit or got distracted. The replay was for the touchdown. That play was in question. The extra point was not.

As I said already said, the replay was definitely after the XP. ESPN's "play by play" doesn't help your take. That just lists shit in order it happened. No one is debating that. However, I am telling you the replay was delayed, temporarily forgotten about, or whatever... but it was for the TD.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 9:03 pm

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: However, I am telling you the replay was delayed, temporarily forgotten about, or whatever... but it was for the TD.

No, it wasn't. They reviewed the XP because they thought the Chargers might have had 12 men on the field.

trev · Post by **trev** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:12 pm

I wasn't drinking yesterday either. But as ditsy as I am, even I know once 6 points are on the board and the extra point is kicked you can't go back and review a touchdown.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:28 pm

trev wrote:I wasn't drinking yesterday either. But as ditsy as I am, even I know once 6 points are on the board and the extra point is kicked you can't go back and review a touchdown.

Regardless of your nonsense, the moniker describing your nic should be named after the Eagles song, "Tequila Sunrise."

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:34 pm

trev wrote:I wasn't drinking yesterday either. But as ditsy as I am, even I know once 6 points are on the board and the extra point is kicked you can't go back and review a touchdown.

All touchdowns get reviewed. Regardless of whether or not the XP has already been kicked.