T1B

No.

A board needs its tards.

Yes. Off your own shit troll.

It isn't funny. It's just annoying.

KC Scott wrote:

smackaholic wrote:No.

A board needs its tards.

We already have you

Can't you fukking read?

A board needs its tards. that would be plural.

tards'

No. He might be shitty but he isn't takeless.

Only if your banning flushes his LTS_TRN2 troll out of retirement. Fucker was a helluva lot more fun to hate. Brad "takes" simply go on auto-scroll.

What brad needs to do is start a thread passionately pleading his case for staying,

He still has one more thread on his auto-TROTS punishment and I would hate to see it go to waste.

mvscal wrote:No. He might be shitty but he isn't takeless.

2nd.

He's out of his mind, but I read his posts

The fact he's got "takes" is precisely the problem.

Still, I say no.

That Brad troll is like a never ending train wreck that takes all the manic energy and vaguely homoerotic rantings of Stanley Pickle, strips out the over the top racism and leaves the reader with a non stop trail of seemingly unintended hilarity. No way should he be banned.

BSmack wrote:That Brad troll is like a never ending train wreck that takes all the manic energy and vaguely homoerotic rantings of Stanley Pickle, strips out the over the top racism and leaves the reader with a non stop trail of seemingly unintended hilarity. No way should he be banned.

There is nothing hilarious about tardhusker. But other than that, I pretty much agree with you.

200lio hates competition.

If we're going to ban someone simply for chronically sucking, then we also have to ban JtR, all the w.i.g.g.e.r. trolls, the Aunt Jemima troll, and countless other shitty posters.

Where bradhusker is concerned, I'm mainly intrigued by the question of why? What would possess someone to create such a childlike character who trolls at a schoolyard level in the guise of a homoerotic bully? As the local busybody librarian might describe him in some dustbowl period-piece drama, he's "kinda slow, but means well."

So you're sitting around one day, reading a thread wherein mvscal is calling someone "lugubriously inept," or some such. Deciding it would be fun to enter the fray, you put your imagination to work and come up with...bradhusker?

What?

This has to be the work of a total uber-tard like LTS TRN 2.

Okay, but isn't "LTS is someone's troll...probably Marty's...." the rampant speculation?

Van wrote:What would possess someone to create such a childlike character

What?

Ask IB. She should come back, though. I'll be gentle. Anyone who stirs the pot should be welcome even if they suck at it.

mvscal, yes, Annie had certain childlike qualities. Absolutely. Hers was a nascent innocence and peculiar naiveté rarely seen in this internet world. The thing is, in some regards she also had a clear, coldly calculating mind that was far removed from the consistent Huck Finn-like schoolboy act of bradhusker. There is never any layering with him. He's that guy with every waking breath.