T1B

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:47 pm**

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:49 pm**

Pitt is in serious trouble.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:50 pm**

Some pretty grim looks on their sideline. This could easily get away.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:51 pm**

Tebow has serious helmet hair. I hate him.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:56 pm**

The virgin is fucking the rapist.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:58 pm**

trev wrote:Tebow has serious helmet hair. I hate him.

Yeah, it looks like he's going to be kicking the Chargers' asses for years to come.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm**

I doubt that. I hate John Elway too. Please don't show him again.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:10 pm**

Dinsdale wrote:My take:

Tebow will turn water into points, and toss loaves and fishes all over the yard in a Denver victory.

This isn't based on any statistical, or even rational analysis -- it would just piss me off so badly, that it's inevitable.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:11 pm**

trev wrote:I doubt that. I hate John Elway too. Please don't show him again.

How can you hate the guy who never made one mistake in his entire career?

Incomplete pass? Just watch where Mr. Ed points his finger to see who was at fault.

One of the more classless douchebags to ever don an NFL uni.

Posted: **Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:17 pm**

btw, did anybody see the opening kickoff?

Prater hits the crossbar, the ball bounces back and lands squarely on the 20 yard line, right in the middle of the field. The ref couldn't have placed it any better.

Damnedest thing I ever saw.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:09 am**

Dinsdale wrote:Tebow will turn water into points, and toss loaves and fishes all over the yard in a Denver victory.

This isn't based on any statistical, or even rational analysis -- it would just piss me off so badly, that it's inevitable.

This is all your fault.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:14 am**

crazy....a perfect storm of events

one of the best stiff arms I've ever seen....

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:34 am**

Ike Taylor may have had one of the worst games ever burped up in the playoffs by any DB in the history of Elvis Patterson.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:39 am**

Van wrote: This is all your fault.

I can't count on my fingers how many of my friends (mostly Duh fans... I have a bunch of those) who agreed with the prognosis.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:50 am**

Some would say it's the devils fault.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:52 am**

Van wrote:Ike Taylor may have had one of the worst games ever burped up in the playoffs by any DB in the history of Elvis Patterson.

+1

Props to the Doinks and their fans. And zero props to whomever neglected to rotate some safety help to Ike Taylor. What an abortion.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:46 am**

BSmack wrote: And zero props to whomever neglected to rotate some safety help to Ike Taylor.

Obviously the game plan was to more or less stuff nine in the box and dare Tebow to beat them through the air...and he did, badly even without Decker. You pretty much have to commit nine anyway because, if you don't, they'll trample you on the ground. Ike Taylor has always bean a weak link. He has been blowing goats from the get go.

It will be interesting to see how New England's corners can hold up. This isn't going to be the same offense they saw just a few weeks ago.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:10 am**

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote: And zero props to whomever neglected to rotate some safety help to Ike Taylor.
Obviously the game plan was to more or less stuff nine in the box and dare Tebow to beat them through the air...and he did, badly even without Decker. You pretty much have to commit nine anyway because, if you don't, they'll trample you on the ground. Ike Taylor has always bean a weak link. He has been blowing goats from the get go.

It will be interesting to see how New England's corners can hold up. This isn't going to be the same offense they saw just a few weeks ago.

Seems like it would have made more sense to spy Tebow with Polamalu and to mix up coverages a bit more. In reality, it wasn't Tebow who beat them, it was Demaryius Thomas beating the living shit out of Ike Taylor. The rest of the receivers combined were about 100 yards. Certainly once Decker went down, they should have adjusted accordingly.

Also, did Dick LeBeau not notice that just about every one of Tebow's completions were on Tebow's left side? Just sayin. Maybe they could have adjusted for it. Shit, for a while I though Cowher was back on the sidelines.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:19 am**

BSmack wrote: In reality, it wasn't Tebow who beat them, it was Demaryius Thomas beating the living shit out of Ike Taylor.

Oh, I see. The ball just got to him all by its lonesome, did it?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:43 am**

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote: In reality, it wasn't Tebow who beat them, it was Demaryius Thomas beating the living shit out of Ike Taylor.
Oh, I see. The ball just got to him all by its lonesome, did it?

I'm not saying Tebow didn't deliver the ball. But it was Thomas who bitch slapped Taylor all over the field to get wide open. And he did it all on one side of the field. Some schematic adjustments were definitely in order.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:58 am**

BSmack wrote: Some schematic adjustments were definitely in order.

Sure...and then you start getting gashed on the ground. With Hampton and Keisel out, is that even a viable option?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:01 am**

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote: Some schematic adjustments were definitely in order.
Sure...and then you start getting gashed on the ground. With Hampton and Keisel out, is that even a viable option?

As it turned out, it would have been the only option. Also, there are ways to disguise coverages. You don't HAVE to send everybody in the box. WTF ever happened to the zone blitz?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:02 am**

BSmack wrote:
Props to the Doinks and their fans.

Hey thanks, buddy.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:26 pm**

Ugh.

Why do I have the feeling that Tebow's dick is going to join the Occupy ESPN's Mouth movement this week?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:32 pm**

BSmack wrote:In reality, it wasn't Tebow who beat them, it was Demaryius Thomas beating the living shit out of Ike Taylor. The rest of the receivers combined were about 100 yards. Certainly once Decker went down, they should have adjusted accordingly.

And the coverage probably would've been tighter had they respected his arm. Regardless, Tebow dropped some deep ball dimes. Gotta give him credit. The Donks finally won a game in large part because of Tebow and not in spite of Tebow.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:41 pm**

trev wrote:Some would say it's the devils fault.

It wasn't Big Ben's fault

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:55 pm**

Was I the only one who didn't think the game was over when they got that TD? Call me a dumbass but I was waiting for a kickoff to the Steelers and saw all the celebrating and finally I looked up and saw the "F/OT" and I was like holy shit it's over.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:59 pm**

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:Was I the only one who didn't think the game was over when they got that TD? Call me a dumbass

Yer a Fuckin Dumbass.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:13 pm**

Yer a Fuckin Jerkoff wrote:Was I the only one who didn't think the game was over when they got that TD?

The ref explained the OT rules, they showed a graphic on the screen covering the OT rules, and the commentators covered the OT rules. So, yeah, you're probably the only one.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:00 pm**

The ref should have just said, "You can't win with a field goal." Isn't that the rule?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:04 pm**

The ref sucked at explaining it. Sounded like he was shitting his pants as he went through the rules..."the ahhh overtime rules in the postseason are...errr....very unique...uhhh...one team kicks off and errr...then...well, you'll figure it out as you go"

I had the adrenaline going since it was a tense game so I couldn't focus on the graphic with all the rules. Plus this was the first time this had happened, ever, so most people were kind of confused. I really did think that the Steelers would get another possession. I think some of you guys did too but you just don't want to admit it.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:09 pm**

What was so fucking confusing about it? They said that both teams would get a possession unless the team with the ball first scored a touchdown. Seems pretty straight forward to me.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:23 pm**

trev wrote:The ref should have just said, "You can't win with a field goal." Isn't that the rule?

Not exactly. To end the game in the first OT possession you have to score 6. After that, OT is sudden death as per usualm. That is, unless the 1st possession results in a field goal. If the 1st possession results in an FG, then the other team can match it and THEN it goes to sudden death. Of course if the other team then scores 6, it ends the game.

Got it?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:39 pm**

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote: Some schematic adjustments were definitely in order.
Sure...and then you start getting gashed on the ground. With Hampton and Keisel out, is that even a viable option?

That's pretty much it. As always, the unsung heroes for Denver (besides their defense, most weeks) were the offensive linemen. They're the reason Tebow can even stay on the field. Were it not for the O-Line's ability to force nine-man defensive boxes to protect against the running game, Tebow would have to face normal pass rushes/defensive schemes. He'd have to sift through complicated coverage packages. He'd have to make quick reads. He'd have to throw under duress to small windows.

He'd have to be an NFL QB.

Instead, he's still playing college ball, where guys like JaMarcus Russell sit back on a lounge chair behind their dominating O-Lines, looking awesome throwing downfield to wide-open receivers.

It's a strange thing, watching Denver's offense. Guys like Brees, Brady, Manning and Rodgers have to be that good in order to set up one-on-one coverages somewhere on the field. All their film study, all the reads they make at the line of scrimmage, it's all designed to locate and isolate the one guy who will enjoy man-coverage. In Tebow's case, every time he lines up and takes a snap he's facing nothing but man-coverage, and it's with all his receivers. He can just pick and choose, waiting all day for the deepest one to run free.

Crazy.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 4:55 pm**

A few comments on the game and the others as well. Why is tackling so freaking poor? What ever happened to wrapping up a guy? Receivers and RB's are too big and strong to be brought down with just a shoulder and guys trying to go for the big hit get burned more often than naught by dipping their head, shoulders and basically using no fundamental form on tackling.
Second.....by week #17 you'd think that blown coverages wouldn't be an issue. How many times do you see on a replay guys getting lost in coverage, guys not knowing where the hell to go, guys at the LOS making adjustments. Don't they go over film, look at formations, practice this shit.
Third...on the TD play in overtime it's a basic rule of thumb if you're going to leave no safety help in the middle of the field then the corner has to force the receiver to the outside and use the sideline as another defender. It's all basic fundamental shit that's taught in high school and even in pop warner sometimes.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:17 pm**

more often than naught

Another additon to the T1B lexicon.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:19 pm**

That's a new twist, too, taking a simple word and inexplicably complicating it into glorious clusterfuckery.

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 5:21 pm**

WTF do you want from a state school education.......

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:19 pm**

what is up Tony?

Posted: **Mon Jan 09, 2012 11:44 pm**

Van wrote:He can just pick and choose, waiting all day for the deepest one to run free.

Crazy.

Not quite that easy, but no doubt having a 240lb running back playing qb sets up some interesting situations......

T1B

Squealers Donks

Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks

Re: Squealers Donks