T1B

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:19 am**

we are very patient people. but know that you hang by a thread.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:30 am**

bradhusker wrote:You are a clown and an idiot for trying to match wits with me.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:51 pm**

Toddowen wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:we
Who's that supposed to entail?

Who do you think? Do I need to spell it for you?

Why don't you attention-whore yourself into another failed suicide attempt, you god-awful simpleton. The day you oozed out of your mother's filth, you should've been stuffed into a barrel of hydrofluoric acid, melted to a bloody stew, then swept into a floor drain.

Posted: **Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:07 pm**

Todd, Mgo may speak for the only people who matter: the mods and Admins who have it within their power to bounce bradflustered right on outta here.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:25 am**

Van wrote:Todd, Mgo may speak for the only people who matter: the mods and Admins who have it within their power to bounce bradflustered right on outta here.

Van - you're one of the last that I would expect to see in here rooting for one's expulsion due to their getting under some's skins....magoo ain't all that....

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:48 am**

Banning is the ultimate pussy move.

Sin,
A Michigan Polack

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 12:58 am**

I'm a Michigan Polack by association.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:03 am**

Todd, you've voiced your displeasure with those of Polish ancestry many times over the years.

Go on. What's the back story? Did you come home one day to find a large, sweaty, garlic-smelling Polak grinding your mom?

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:33 am**

Ok, let's get down to brass tacks here. Where do me, Marty and Goobs fall in your ranking of pure hatred and disgust? I will accept nothing less than the #1 spot.

p.s. this post was made from a coffee shop in Warsaw.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 1:35 am**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Ok, let's get down to brass tacks here. Where do me, Marty and Goobs fall in your ranking of pure hatred and disgust? I will accept nothing less than the #1 spot.

p.s. this post was made from a coffee shop in Warsaw.

A pierogi joint in Hamtramk would be better.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:32 am**

WolverineSteve wrote:A pierogi joint in Hamtramk would be better.

shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... just go with it. We're not dealing with the best and brightest here, just some 3rd shift machinist that hasn't enjoyed the scent of a woman since he bought a box of heavy duty trash bags and a roll of duct tape.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:56 am**

MgBl0w, please tell me this horrendous bradhuser troll isn't one of you clowns to piss off the entire board.

Tardowned is unreadable and I mostly scroll by everything he posts. This bhusker troll is the absolute worst of the worst and I'm not kidding when I say I don't read anything it writes. It's like those old Derron sigs that took up half the page.

Now if it's a real legit poster and not an Admin troll, then that's really sad and an oxygen thief. You have that IP button on the admin panel. You know if he's legit or not.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 3:57 am**

a Todd post is an instant death knell to any thread. Goobs may be the definitive last word whore but he pales in comparison.

This is a measurable fact.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:26 am**

The Seer wrote:
Van wrote:Todd, Mgo may speak for the only people who matter: the mods and Admins who have it within their power to bounce bradflustered right on outta here.
Van - you're one of the last that I would expect to see in here rooting for one's expulsion due to their getting under some's skins....magoo ain't all that....

Actually, I think Mgo is precisely all that, by definition. He's one of The Deciders. I was merely pointing out that Mgo and his nihilistic managerial cohorts do in fact possess such power.

As for me, I would never suggest banning a person simply because he gets under someone's skin. I would however suggest banning someone for being a pathetic troll who spams like a motherfucker at every turn. Sucking isn't a bannable offense; spamming is, and we've seen a number of people banned for that very reason.

In brad's case, I happen to believe that he's 100% spamming and he sucks. No way a functional adult posts that childish nonsense. If you feel his posts are genuine, then I can see where you wouldn't want him banned.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 2:37 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Ok, let's get down to brass tacks here. Where do me, Marty and Goobs fall in your ranking of pure hatred and disgust?.

Toddowen wrote:While Goober's a last word whore and I don't necessarily agree with his politics, at least I'll get a kick out of his post and will read what he has to say.

War Wagon wrote:a Todd post is an instant death knell to any thread. Goobs may be the definitive last word whore but he pales in comparison.

This is a measurable fact.

And can you feel the love tonight
It is where we are
It's enough for this wide-eyed wanderer
That we got this far
And can you feel the love tonight
How it's laid to rest
It's enough to make kings and vagabonds
Believe the very best

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:21 pm**

Probably just another tard from .net trying (and succeeding) in getting under people's skin. Ignore feature works well until people start quoting his posts.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:24 pm**

I'm not saying he's someone's troll. I'm saying he's spamming and he sucks. A person can spam under an original nic.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 5:30 pm**

KC Scott wrote:The tools we have

Isn't the thread subject one of them?

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:02 pm**

Spaming = intentionally littering threads with repetitive, inane garbage for the sole purpose of being annoying.

bradhusker meets this definition to a tee. He habitually shits on any topic with one of these nonsequitur responses: 1. "SICK-minded liberals!" 2. "The KING!" 3. Some truly witless description of cocksucking/sperm-lapping.

The key phrase being 'nonsequitur.' He doesn't even attempt to address a given topic. He simply picks out a key phrase within someone's post that he can use to jumpstart his stupid spamming agenda. He'll C&P their entire diatribe and not respond in any sort of good faith to a single word of it.

bradhusker also clearly meets the Supreme Court's infamous definition of porn. You know it when you see it with this guy...he's spamming.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 6:50 pm**

Van wrote:bradhusker also clearly meets the Supreme Court's infamous definition of porn. You know it when you see it with this guy...he's spamming.

Sorry to nitpick, but that was obscenity, not porn. And it wasn't the entire Supreme Court's definition, just Justice Stewart's.

Also, the statement began with, "I can't define it, but . . ."

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 7:43 pm**

Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Van wrote:bradhusker also clearly meets the Supreme Court's infamous definition of porn. You know it when you see it with this guy...he's spamming.
Sorry to nitpick, but that was obscenity, not porn. And it wasn't the entire Supreme Court's definition, just Justice Stewart's.

Also, the statement began with, "I can't define it, but . . ."

Seriously?

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:15 pm**

Van wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Van wrote:bradhusker also clearly meets the Supreme Court's infamous definition of porn. You know it when you see it with this guy...he's spamming.
Sorry to nitpick, but that was obscenity, not porn. And it wasn't the entire Supreme Court's definition, just Justice Stewart's.

Also, the statement began with, "I can't define it, but . . ."
Seriously?

Parenthetically?

:|

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:31 pm**

Terry in Crapchester wrote:Sorry to nitpick

Archive.

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:27 pm**

No doubt.

"In all fairness, and I'm sorry to nitpick, but..." could easily be TiC's avatar blurb. It would sure beat "Doesn't like black cock."

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:45 pm**

Van wrote:He simply picks out a key phrase within someone's post that he can use to jumpstart his stupid spamming agenda. He'll C&P their entire diatribe and not respond in any sort of good faith to a single word of it.

Oh that reminds me, how is IB doing? Have you kept in touch?

Posted: **Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:52 pm**

Posted: **Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:06 am**

Van wrote:Spaming = intentionally littering threads with repetitive, inane garbage for the sole purpose of being annoying.

Shouldn't "spaming" have two (2) m's?

Posted: **Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:11 am**

The Seer wrote:
Van wrote:Spaming = intentionally littering threads with repetitive, inane garbage for the sole purpose of being annoying.
Sorry to nitpick, but shouldn't "spaming" have two (2) m's?

FTFY

Posted: **Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:08 am**

mvscal wrote:
The Seer wrote:
Van wrote:Spaming = intentionally littering threads with repetitive, inane garbage for the sole purpose of being annoying.
Sorry to nitpick, but shouldn't "spaming" have two (2) m's?
FTFY

tenor - the course of thought or meaning that runs through something written or spoken; purport; drift.

T1B

bradhusker

bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker

Re: bradhusker