Page 1 of 1

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 3:06 pm
by L45B
Sudden Sam wrote:There are 3 SEC schools on that list.
Which means they each play each other. Which is why they are all on the list. :wink:

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 8:28 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Sudden Sam wrote:Understood.

But the bulk of this board doesn't seem to think the SEC has that many good teams.
I don't think anyone on this board has ever said that there aren't a number of good teams in the SEC. Certainly, I've never said that, and for that matter, I've never read it either.

Seems to me that the issue most folks here have with the SEC is the teams you guys play OOC.

Btw, did you see who's #1?

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 8:38 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Sam knows that, Terry. He's just being a disingenuous tard.

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:18 am
by Van
Terry, having a tough schedule only matters if you win the games. So, don't worry about it.

:mrgreen:

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 3:53 am
by Laxplayer
You know what Van...fuck you........ND will be luck to go .500 or slightly above with that schedule...ND constantly plays one of the toughest schedules in the country.......and that schedule is a mother....maybe under .500

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 5:29 am
by Van
Hey, what can I say? Maybe it's just me, but it doesn't look like those...

Image

...are smiling.

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 1:58 pm
by Terry in Crapchester
Van wrote:Terry, having a tough schedule only matters if you win the games. So, don't worry about it.

:mrgreen:
Van, since you want to weigh in on ND's schedule, maybe we should revisit a discussion you and I had a few years back. As I recall, it went something along the lines of this:

You: ND's schedule sucks, and it sucks because they're pussies. They need to join the Big Ten to get their schedule back to where it should be. Of course, they won't do that because they're pussies.

Me: ND's schedule sucks right now because they're hampered by a few shitty deals White made while he was ND. Once those deals run their course, the schedule will be back -- without the Big Ten. Besides, ND faces Michigan and USC every year, and has faced Penn State, Tennessee and Florida State, among others, within the past ten years. You're not really saying that the reason ND isn't in the Big Ten is that they're afraid of the likes of Illinois, Indiana and Minnesota, are you?

:mrgreen:

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 4:07 pm
by Van
Terry, the main reason ND's schedule is usually fairly decent is because they're already a de facto Big 10 team. Oh, and because they play USC every year. May as well make it official and join a real conference before they wind up in the dogshit Big Least along with, ummmm, who is it this week? Louisville, South Florida and Rutgers?

Or, hey, you can continue to go about your business as you have been, because that's just been working out so well for you. It's not like the obvious future of superconferences won't relegate ND to the dustbin of history if they don't get in on it or anything, nope, not at all.

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 5:01 pm
by SunCoastSooner
Oklahoma went from having one of the tougher schedules in the country to one of the weakest when TCU was brought into the Big 12. TCU and Notre Dame would have comprised the core of our OOC but now TCU is a conference game.

Re: Toughest schedules of 2012

Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 5:35 pm
by Goober McTuber
Sudden Sam wrote:ND needs to make a move soon. They're rapidly becoming irrelevant...at least as a NC contending team.
Sincerely,

1994