Page 1 of 3

The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:54 pm
by BSmack
Image

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:00 pm
by Wolfman
So predictable Bri. Next thing you'll tell us is how Joe Biden is the smartest man in the room.
Just remembered ---a while back someone else did the debate with a chair routine. Tell us who it was.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:13 pm
by poptart
If an old Hollywood liberal rambled aimlessly and made as big a buffoon out of himself as Clint did last night, the conservatives would rightfully be laffing about it for months.

The throat slash - directed at the _resident?

Umm...

Very inappropriate in that setting.


Jsc already noted in the other thread that Clint apparently didn't know (or forgot -certainly possible) that Romney has a Harvard Law degree.

Dumbass remark, Mr. Eastwood.


He was also pretty far out of line when he twice implied that Barry (from the chair) was telling Romney to go fuck himself.

Are you kidding me?


Just an overall ridiculous spectacle.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:16 pm
by smackaholic
I was hoping he would pull out a .44 magnum and shoot the chair.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 1:36 pm
by poptart
Roach wrote:
poptart wrote:Just an overall ridiculous spectacle.

As if the entire election debacle isn't?
I can't argue with that.

Clint walked over to the sewer and dropped a turd into it.

All is well.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:32 pm
by poptart
That's true, Scott.
It usually isn't as bad as the media makes it out to be.

But a throat-slash gesture = a 15 yd taunting penalty in the NFL.

I'm thinking if we don't even allow our neanderthals to do something, we ought to expect folks standing at the podiums of the national political conventions to refrain from the action.


And now you know the libs are going to have a field day ripping on all the KKKers at the GOP convention who went into a joyous uproar when Clint Eastwood motioned that they should HANG THAT BLACK FUCKING PRESIDENT!!!

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:41 pm
by Van
In the clip I saw his throat-slashing gesture wasn't made to Obama, it was made to the audience as a joking way of telling them to pipe down so he could begin his speech. Did he do it a second time?

No, I didn't watch the whole thing.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:28 pm
by Felix
KC Scott wrote:I just watched it - not near the train wreck some are making it out to be
but it was pretty bad.....had the "cranky old man down the street" feel to it



Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:50 pm
by Mikey
Wolfman wrote:So predictable Bri. Next thing you'll tell us is how Joe Biden is the smartest man in the room.
Just remembered ---a while back someone else did the debate with a chair routine. Tell us who it was.
No doubt you thought it was the greatest performance in memory. You're about the most predictable poster around, especially with your entirely predictable "so predictable" responses.

It was Newhart, btw, and I hear he's thinking of hiring Apple's legal team to go after Dirty Harry.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 3:51 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
He should've just done the fake gun thing at the mic and walked away.

Image

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:10 pm
by Derron
Fuck that fake gun shit.

He should have just pulled out the 44 auto Mag and started waving it around and said we are going to take this country back from you liberal tax and spend entitlement mother fuckers right now !

Image

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:39 pm
by Mikey
He prolly couldn't even lift a real one of those things at this point.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:41 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gplqbKqvtLw/TakYRP85nnI/AAAAAAAAAEg/OnvbLnr1k00/s1600/redneck_gun_20100526_1984409262.jpg[/img] wrote:Fuck that fake gun shit.

He should have just pulled out the 44 auto Mag and started waving it around and said we are going to take this country back from you liberal tax and spend entitlement mother fuckers right now !
America! Fuck yeah!!

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:49 pm
by LTS TRN 2
So..Clint is against the war in Afghanistan? He suggested we should have checked with the Russians first? And he..sort of..suggested that Mittens would have them out tomorrow? And... he's talking to an empty chair?

Okay...let's see a single example of Clint ever saying anything above a fifth-grade level on any subject. It sure didn't happen last night. How sad.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:54 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Derron wrote:Fuck that fake gun shit.

He should have just pulled out the 44 auto Mag and started waving it around and said we are going to take this country back from you liberal tax and spend entitlement mother fuckers right now !

Image

Gee, Derron, you're just so funny... :shock: Good thing you're in a stupor and don't really see yourself.

A heavily armed ex-Marine in camouflage gear gunned down two co-workers in a New Jersey supermarket rampage before killing himself early Friday, officials said.

The disgruntled worker returned to the Pathmark store around 4 a.m. and began blasting at the skeleton staff with an AK-47 assault rifle, said Middlesex County Prosecutor Bruce Kaplan.

An unprovoked Terence Tyler, 23, rapidly squeezed off 16 shots from the rifle, killing defenseless Christine Lobrutto, 18, and Brian Breen, 24 — both of suburban Old Bridge, N.J.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:56 pm
by Wolfman
Maybe Smackie will play this tonight---Sparks:
You're gonna take a walk in the rain
And you're gonna get wet
(I predict)
You're gonna eat a bowl of chow mein
And be hungry real soon
(I predict)
Are my sources correct
(I predict)
They're gonna find the Queen is a man
But that Philip don't care
(I predict)
Lassie will prove that Elvis and her
Had a fleeting affair
(I predict)
Are my sources correct
Are my sources correct
Yes I know they're corect
(I predict)
Men, if you say your prayers
You'll never lose your hair
L.A. is safe
Ain't gonna quake
Ain't gonna quake, I predict
And somebody's gonna die
But I can't reveal who
Cold beer will cure a cold
Cold beer and pretzels, takes care of cancer
Moscow will march to France
They'll do the Can-Can Dance
Don't worry, it'll work out
Maxim's will throw them out
They're gonna stop Saturday night
So you better have fun now
(I predict)
They're gonna stop having the sun
So you better get tan now
(I predict)
And this song will fade out
Yes this song will fade out
And this song will fade out
(I predict)

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:19 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Whatcha doin', Wolfie, singing tunes under a train trestle with an ol' coot like Clint? Just drunk in the daytime, eh?

Hey, wake up, wolfie, Condi's coming on!
Image

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:41 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Really, and how'd you like the faithful hall howling in support of leaving Afghanistan tomorrow? Wasn't that cute of Clint to lead the sheep-like fold into loudly and unanimously cheering to end a war--the opposite of Mitten's demented agenda? It's always cute to see confused old men blather and make everyone look foolish. :grin:

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:44 pm
by Derron
LTS TRN 2 wrote:


A heavily armed ex-Marine in camouflage gear , unprovoked , rapidly squeezed off, defenseless,
You have to love your news sources there LTSTard. You know the one that throw those terms in that are completely immaterial to the story, but serve to amp up the reporting factor ?

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 6:48 pm
by Derron
Nothing like throwing a little bait out there and watching the usual suspects melt down and swallow it whole.... :lol: :lol:

Image

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:45 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Well, within the murky code of Clint's headspace I sort of see what you mean. He's on board with the Permanent War just like Barry and Mittens.
Derron wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:


A heavily armed ex-Marine in camouflage gear , unprovoked , rapidly squeezed off, defenseless,
You have to love your news sources there LTSTard. You know the one that throw those terms in that are completely immaterial to the story, but serve to amp up the reporting factor ?
No, derron, it's completely relevant that his marine corp behavior led him straight to a suicidal murderous meltdown. It's actually quite common nowadays, though you won't here of it among the loony platitude bukkake fest in Tampa. In fact more verterans are committing suicide than are being killed in the field (by "enemies" or "allies").

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:52 pm
by Van
They must have read this board.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 8:40 pm
by LTS TRN 2
Van wrote:They must have read this board.
You tired old coward, go blow your nose on a used Depends.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:00 pm
by BSmack
88 wrote:Mitt's agenda for Afghanistan is apparently to let the commanders make the call when and whether to withdrawal based on the conditions on the ground. Linky, linky: http://www.mittromney.com/issues/afghanistan-pakistan
That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. It is not the job of ground commanders to decide when a war ends, it is the job of our elected leaders. Nice "leadership" Mitt.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:12 pm
by Mikey
BSmack wrote:
88 wrote:Mitt's agenda for Afghanistan is apparently to let the commanders make the call when and whether to withdrawal based on the conditions on the ground. Linky, linky: http://www.mittromney.com/issues/afghanistan-pakistan
That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. It is not the job of ground commanders to decide when a war ends, it is the job of our elected leaders. Nice "leadership" Mitt.
They ARE heroes, though, so maybe they should decide. Mitt's not a decsion maker, after all, he's a delegator.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 9:14 pm
by Mikey
Derron wrote:Nothing like throwing a little bait out there and watching the usual suspects melt down and swallow it whole.... :lol: :lol:
No shit. I did notice a truly massive meltdown in this thread.

Or was that in your brain?

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:11 pm
by Van
LTS TRN 2 wrote:
Van wrote:They must have read this board.
You tired old coward, go blow your nose on a used Depends.
:mrgreen:

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:21 pm
by Derron
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Well, within the murky code of Clint's headspace I sort of see what you mean. He's on board with the Permanent War just like Barry and Mittens.
Derron wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:


A heavily armed ex-Marine in camouflage gear , unprovoked , rapidly squeezed off, defenseless,
You have to love your news sources there LTSTard. You know the one that throw those terms in that are completely immaterial to the story, but serve to amp up the reporting factor ?
No, derron, it's completely relevant that his marine corp behavior led him straight to a suicidal murderous meltdown. It's actually quite common nowadays, though you won't here of it among the loony platitude bukkake fest in Tampa. In fact more verterans are committing suicide than are being killed in the field (by "enemies" or "allies").
You stupid fucking piece of whale shit troll...how many other people were whacked in this country yesterday ? Did that make the news ? It is popular with the media to promote these ideas of crazy servicemen, and then the shills like you pick up on it. Ratings mother fucker ratings..

Fuck off troll.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:21 am
by poptart
Van wrote:In the clip I saw his throat-slashing gesture wasn't made to Obama,
it was made to the audience as a joking way of telling them to pipe
down so he could begin his speech. Did he do it a second time?


Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:24 am
by Bizzarofelice
KC Scott wrote:they're missing (obviously) symbolism of Obama as an empty suit
yeah. cause clint eastwood is big on symbolism in his work.

dumbass.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:52 am
by M Club
Image

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:06 am
by mvscal
Bizzarofelice wrote:yeah. cause clint eastwood is big on symbolism in his work.
As a matter of fact he is, you ignorant, dong slurping dipshit.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:03 am
by Bizzarofelice
mvscal wrote:dong slurping dipshit.
HOORAY! TANTRUM BOY IS BACK!!



Image

Oh, the oppressed man must throw himself against the unyielding and uncaring government.





Image

Do we exist outside of our own selves?





Image

A man should measure all possibilities and weigh potential outcomes with matters of life and death.





Image

black cock




Image

i found a nice place to visit/ but a better place to rob

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:24 am
by LTS TRN 2
Derron wrote:
You have to love your news sources there LTSTard. You know the one that throw those terms in that are completely immaterial to the story, but serve to amp up the reporting factor ?
No, derron, it's completely relevant that his marine corp behavior led him straight to a suicidal murderous meltdown. It's actually quite common nowadays, though you won't here of it among the loony platitude bukkake fest in Tampa. In fact more verterans are committing suicide than are being killed in the field (by "enemies" or "allies").

[/quote]

You stupid fucking piece of whale shit troll...how many other people were whacked in this country yesterday ? Did that make the news ? It is popular with the media to promote these ideas of crazy servicemen, and then the shills like you pick up on it. Ratings mother fucker ratings..

Fuck off troll.[/quote]




Bullshit. Whenever someone goes off and kills even more than one person, it's news. And this is a good thing, not something to complain about. When psycho episodes go unreported, that's when we're really over the line. This guy's PTSD episode is now fairly common and each horrid crime seems like snowflakes...hold on, you're not getting it...

Investigators claim that a Marine's wife was killed after refusing to take part in sadomasochistic sex at a northern San Diego County home.

A judge on Wednesday released court documents, including search warrant affidavits.

In them, investigators say 22-year-old Brittany Killgore apparently didn't know about the sexual lifestyle of Marine Staff Sgt. Louis Perez when she accepted his invitation to a dinner cruise on April 13.

Investigators say they found an apparent "sex dungeon" along with whips, knives and sex toys at the Fallbrook home where Perez is accused of strangling Killgore.

The Camp Pendleton Marine and two women, Dorothy Maraglino and Jessica Lynn Lopez, have pleaded not guilty to murder.

Killgore had filed for divorce three days earlier from her husband, who was in Afghanistan.



Now, which came first, the S&M murderer or the Marine. Think about it? :wink:

Image

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:06 am
by smackaholic
BSmack wrote:
88 wrote:Mitt's agenda for Afghanistan is apparently to let the commanders make the call when and whether to withdrawal based on the conditions on the ground. Linky, linky: http://www.mittromney.com/issues/afghanistan-pakistan
That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. It is not the job of ground commanders to decide when a war ends, it is the job of our elected leaders. Nice "leadership" Mitt.
It is the way it's always been done in real wars, dumbfukk.

Well, that's not really true. During WWII Hitler used your and Barry's leadership model. FDR, OTOH, did it the right way. Ike/MacArthur had complete control on the scene.

The fact that you are clacking out your take in English rather than German is a pretty fukking good indication of which is the proper method.

And even if you do prefer the Hitler war leadership model, publishing a get the fukk outta dodge date during a war is mindnumbingly stupid. The proper answer to any war's end date is "when we win".

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:19 pm
by Carson
Clint was appealing to the Ahlzeimers vote.

Too bad they won't remember it.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:35 pm
by mvscal
smackaholic wrote:
BSmack wrote:
88 wrote:Mitt's agenda for Afghanistan is apparently to let the commanders make the call when and whether to withdrawal based on the conditions on the ground. Linky, linky: http://www.mittromney.com/issues/afghanistan-pakistan
That is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. It is not the job of ground commanders to decide when a war ends, it is the job of our elected leaders. Nice "leadership" Mitt.
It is the way it's always been done in real wars, dumbfukk.
Pop your head out of your ass for just a sec and try to wrap your empty noodle around the concept of civilian supremacy over the military under our Constitution.

Oh, and Ike and MacArthur did NOT have carte blanche. FDR generally put his trust in Marshall and King but he didn't hestitate to overrule them especially on poilitical considerations.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:00 pm
by smackaholic
mvscal wrote: Pop your head out of your ass for just a sec and try to wrap your empty noodle around the concept of civilian supremacy over the military under our Constitution.

Oh, and Ike and MacArthur did NOT have carte blanche. FDR generally put his trust in Marshall and King but he didn't hestitate to overrule them especially on poilitical considerations.
Of course FDR was in charge and his generals/admirals could not act without his approval. High level strategical decisions had to be run by him. My point is that FDR knew that he wasn't a military expert and didn't try to act like one, unlike Hitler who figured that a few years of infantry experience as a corporal was good enough to run things strategically and tactically.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 1:44 am
by mvscal
smackaholic wrote:...unlike Hitler who figured that a few years of infantry experience as a corporal was good enough to run things strategically and tactically.
Hitler at the top of his game was the equal of the General Staff. He was almost a savant in his capacity to absorb and process massive amounts of detail in all the different facets of government. In the early days of the 3rd Reich his leadership was energetic, out of the box and successful at all turns and often against the advice of the more conservative General Staff. His 'Downfall' was primarily drug related. By 1943 he was tweaking balls 24/7, eating poorly and made a fucking dog's breakfast out of Germany.

Re: The reveiws are in on Clint Eastwood's speech

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 9:40 am
by smackaholic
Yeah, I guess you're right. I suppose making a U turn and going after Stalin when he had England on the ropes was a stroke of strategic brilliance. And that wiping out the jews bit, yeah, that was pretty clever too. I mean, who needs atomic physicists on their side in a war anyway?

:meds: :meds:

Going after Russia, as stupid as it was, might have actually worked for him, had he went there as a liberator rather than a conqueror. Uncle Joe wasn't exactly Mr popularity in the Ukraine in the summer of 1940.

His brilliance laid in being able to whip up a crowd and stomp a mud hole in the few that didn't whip up sufficiently. The fact that there were successes early on was more a testament to the German people than to him. Put him in charge of a bunch of lazy mexicans rather than Aryans and he don't look so good.