T1B

Not as good as you think you are idgidts.

Envy sniping at it's best.

Besides LSU's very predictable asswhoopin of UDub (they're bad on both sides... breaks my heart), and Colorado making us laugh, the PAC blew the doors off of week 2... looking better than the SEC so far. Definitely the two best conferences at this point.

Dinsdale wrote:Besides LSU's very predictable asswhoopin of UDub (they're bad on both sides... breaks my heart), and Colorado making us laugh, the PAC blew the doors off of week 2... looking better than the SEC so far. Definitely the two best conferences at this point.

Really the PAC 10 and SEC? Weird because when I look at what conference has the best records right now, has the most wins against FBS opponents, and tied with the Pac 12 for best winning percentage against other BCS schools it is the Big 12. Completely leaving them out of the argument is comical at this point.

The SEC is definitely overrated this season, greatly.

Alabama looks very strong. LSU looks like a top 10 team but other than that . . .

South Carolina struggled with Vanderbilt who proved they're worth by promptly turning around and getting bitch slapped by North-fucking-western.

Anyone who watched the Georgia/Buffalo game knows that Georgia did not look overly impressive for the majority of the game against a team who has had, what . . . two winning seasons in the last two decades?

I'm not sure what to think about Tennessee, NC State is simply a bad team and Georgia State simply isn't a very good indicator.

Kentucky was absolutely bitch slapped by Louisville.

Mississippi State beat an FCS team and an Allbarn team that couldn't find the end zone with a map, compass, and tour guide.

Ole Miss gave up 27 to Central Arkansas . . . Central Arkansas is probably the fourth best college team in ARKANSAS, a state whose flag ship school lost to a a Sun Belt team yesterday . . .

Arkansas . . . Louisiana-Monroe, end story.

Allbarn is pathetic on offense, there can't be anyone who has watched them and doesn't see that.

But the most comical thing I have seen all season was the ESPN/ABC commentating during the Florida/aTm game yesterday. They tossed out phrases such as "The Florida vs. Texas All star game." and "An elite Texas A&M team." Have these ESPiN hype machine fuckers watched college football this century? Only once since 2000 has Texas A&M finished better than the fifth best record in the Big 12 or better than 3rd in the South when it was two divisions (more often fourth or lower than third or higher in truth as well) and suddenly they're an elite team because they put on a fucking different conference patch? Are you fucking kidding me?!?! Florida won by the skin of its teeth, at home, against a middle tier MAC, who almost lost to fucking IDAHO yesterday, team last week!!!

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc12.htm

And the SEC started the year with the built in advantage of having the higher initial point values of any conference in his system . . . Just sayin'.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc12.htm

And the SEC started the year with the built in advantage of having the higher initial point values of any conference in his system . . . Just sayin'.

And OU SHOULD have lost to UTEP. Thanks for playing.

A team that won by more than two touchdowns "should have lost" . . . ? Please tell us more.

I know that Auburn DID lose twice. Arkiesaw DID lose to Louisiana-Monroe. And Vanderbilt DID lose to Northwestern. Those are things that DID happen as opposed to what Papaasswipe speculates as to what should have happened.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:
A team that won by more than two touchdowns "should have lost" . . . ? Please tell us more.

I know that Auburn DID lose twice. Arkiesaw DID lose to Louisiana-Monroe. And Vanderbilt DID lose to Northwestern. Those are things that DID happen as opposed to what Papaasswipe speculates as to what should have happened.

Don't be stupid. You know UTEP gave OU more than they could ever bargain for in that game. That score wasn't EVEN close to describing the real game. Stay on the subject, corn-fag. You know your team of overpaid fags is in trouble this year. And - as completely per usual - they're totally overrated.

My team is overrated? Maybe, maybe not. The season will play out for us.

What the hell justified Allbarn to even receive votes much less be in the top 25?

I know my team is 2-0 and only two teams in my conference have even lost a single game . . . meanwhile in Allbarn they still have yet to even sniff a win (I do believe that tonight Allbarn has as many losses as the entire Big 12 conference combined has accumulated). I'd congratulate you on your impending annual lackluster victory against a vaunted Sun Belt school next week if that opponent hadn't already kicked in your even higher rated and more hyped conference mate's teeth last night on their home field already. You have Louisiana-Monroe, Ole Piss, Vanderbilt, New Mexico State, and Alabama A&M all on your schedule this season and still may only get three wins. You're a long shot to get bowl eligible. If the season in Norman were that bleak I would be less worried about crying about teams who actually deserve to be ranked somewhere in the top twenty-five and more concerned with what players you can buy, specifically quarterbacks (again) and Olinemen, with all that recruiting time you'll have in December and January so maybe you can be relevant again at some point.

P.S. The subject was the SEC being overhyped and overrated this year . . . and your school is a prime example and exhibit "A" for the argument.

schmick wrote:I dont think UTEP ever scored a single point on offense vs OU

Don't confuse papaasswhipe with facts. He doesn't handle those very well.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:
My team is overrated? Maybe, maybe not. The season will play out for us.

What the hell justified Allbarn to even receive votes much less be in the top 25?

I know my team is 2-0 and only two teams in my conference have even lost a single game . . . meanwhile in Allbarn they still have yet to even sniff a win (I do believe that tonight Allbarn has as many losses as the entire Big 12 conference combined has accumulated). I'd congratulate you on your impending annual lackluster victory against a vaunted Sun Belt school next week if that opponent hadn't already kicked in your even higher rated and more hyped conference mate's teeth last night on their home field already. You have Louisiana-Monroe, Ole Piss, Vanderbilt, New Mexico State, and Alabama A&M all on your schedule this season and still may only get three wins. You're a long shot to get bowl eligible. If the season in Norman were that bleak I would be less worried about crying about teams who actually deserve to be ranked somewhere in the top twenty-five and more concerned with what players you can buy, specifically quarterbacks (again) and Olinemen, with all that recruiting time you'll have in December and January so maybe you can be relevant again at some point.

P.S. The subject was the SEC being overhyped and overrated this year . . . and your school is a prime example and exhibit "A" for the argument.

Ole fucking Miss fucked up UTEP a LOT worse than OU did. Look at the box scores, Mr. I'mdepressedbecauseIhavenofriendswhereIliveat.

Regardless of this point, it's fuckers like you and Schitt who are always harping about "I don't give a fuck about what my conference does, I'm only about my team".

The irony is hilarious.

OU has never had an off year, have they? Nor USC. Right? Oh - that's right - you fucks are always #1, right? Family-fucking freaks...

I argue about the strength of conferences as much or more than anybody on this entire board with maybe the exception of SuddenSam. Hell the two of us have been the lynch pins of the conference strength debates the last three years running. Is there anything you get factually correct . . . ever?

No friends what so ever. I haven't been posting much the last six months because I have been being busy as a best man at three different weddings and groomsman in two others for my non-friends. Why does this seem so much like projecting on your part . . .

Yes, please do go look at the box scores dimwit . . . Ole Miss played at home (Oklahoma played in El Paso), gave up more yards than Oklahoma did even with UTEP's best offensive player sitting the game out (Jefferies). Ole Piss averaged fewer yards per play than Oklahoma did. Ole Piss gave up more first downs (17 > 13). UTEP's QBs went 27 of 40 passing the ball; compared to going 7 of 26 against Oklahoma. Ole Piss didn't have a 100 yard receiver which Oklahoma did with Kenny Stills and his 121 yards. Ole MIss' leading rusher had a whopping 9 more yards than Oklahoma's leading rusher (a second string back who came in after Whaley bruised his shoulder) who averaged 11.6 yards a carry (that would be 3.2 more yards than Ole Piss' leading rusher). Ole Piss gave up 10 points to the El Paso offense, Oklahoma gave up 0/Zero/nil/goose egg. I'm convinced you were probably looking at Allbarn's pathetic box score in . . . well pick either game they have played.


And yes we have an occasional down year . . . they are called 9-4/8-5 seasons, end up kicking the shit out of some poor victim in something like the Holiday Bowl (Oregon and Stanford for example), in which we play an infinitely tougher OOC schedule than the likes of New Mexico State, Lousiana-Monroe, and Alabama A&M such as TCU, Tulsa, and UCLA or BYU, Idaho State, Tulsa, and Miami . . . but what they aren't is praying to get to three wins on a schedule that has a Sun Belt team, an FCS school, and a mid-major team who hasn't had a season above .500 in more than a decade.

Then again that's the difference between the Oklahomas of the world and the Allbarns; the definition of our "down years" are about equal to your typical years and your down years would get coaching staffs and entire athletic departments fired in Norman.

Whenever you get tired of getting your shit verbally pushed in feel free to walk away chump.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:
I argue about the strength of conferences as much or more than anybody on this entire board with maybe the exception of SuddenSam. Hell the two of us have been the lynch pins of the conference strength debates the last three years running. Is there anything you get factually correct . . . ever?

No friends what so ever. I haven't been posting much the last six months because I have been being busy as a best man at three different weddings and groomsman in two others for my non-friends. Why does this seem so much like projecting on your part . . .

Yes, please do go look at the box scores dimwit . . . Ole Miss played at home (Oklahoma played in El Paso), gave up more yards than Oklahoma did even with UTEP's best offensive player sitting the game out (Jeffery's). Ole Piss averaged fewer yards per play than Oklahoma did. Ole Piss gave up more first downs (17 > 13). UTEP's QBs went 27 of 40 passing the ball; compared to going 7 of 26 against Oklahoma. Ole Piss didn't have a 100 yard receiver which Oklahoma did with Kenny Stills and his 121 yards. Ole MIss' leading rusher had a whopping 9 more yards that Oklahoma's leading rusher (a second string back who came in after Whaley bruised his shoulder) who averaged 11.6 yards a carry (that would be 3.2 more yards than Ole Piss' leading rusher). Ole Piss gave up 10 points to the El Paso offense, Oklahoma gave up 0/Zero/nil/goose egg. I'm convinced you were probably looking at Allbarn's pathetic box score in . . . well pick either game they have played.


And yes we have an occasional down year . . . they are called 9-4/8-5 seasons, end up kicking the shit out of some poor victim in something like the Holiday Bowl (Oregon and Stanford for example), in which we play an infinitely tougher OOC schedule than the likes of New Mexico State, Lousiana-Monroe, and Alabama A&M such as TCU, Tulsa, and UCLA or BYU, Idaho State, Tulsa, and Miami . . . but what they aren't is praying to get to three wins on a schedule that has a Sun Belt team, an FCS school, and a mid-major team who hasn't had a season above .500 in more than a decade.

Then again that's the difference between the Oklahomas of the world and the Allbarns; the definition of our "down years" are about equal to your typical years and your down years would get coaching staffs and entire athletic departments fired in Norman.

Whenever you get tired of getting your shit verbally pushed in feel free to walk away chump.

1. We understand that you are a bitter little farmer guy who lives in SEC world. I'm sure everybody looks at you and your bitterness and just laughs.

2. Since you want to get into stats, why not include the fact that Ole Piss had 538 total yards vs. OU's 427 against the Miners? Ole Piss ran for 332 vs. OU's 205. OU had the ball longer against UTEP than Ole Piss did. So basically - the SEC's WORST team beat UTEP worse than the Big 12's BEST (buwahaaha) could do. Ole Piss jumped on them and never looked back. OU fought for their fucking lives.

3. It's pretty well known that OU and the SEC were in talks. It's also pretty well OBVIOUS that OU wanted no part of the SEC, because they'd rather be a big fish in a small pond. In short - OU was a pussy.


You have been excused, farm boy in SEC world.

1. You're the only one who ever brings up such a subject and you claim others are the bitter ones; that's pretty rich. Feel free to keep projecting because you're right, nobody is fooled; I'm sure it is crystal clear why you feel the need to be so obsessed with it.

2. I didn't think this would need to be explained but obviously your grasp of the game is lacking. Oklahoma was on the road and used the clock more. Its defense was dominating the game. They sat on the ball longer and ran clock. Oklahoma had fewer total yards but also averaged more yards per play than Ole MIss. Oklahoma used the UTEP game as a tune up where it played and got game experience for as many players as possible. Ole Miss used the game to play its starters exclusively and try to run up a score on a lower tier team; unsuccessfully at that.

The SEC's worst team? I couldn't tell by the records, that looks like Allbarn and Vanderbilt every time I look at the standings. But while we are on the subject of being a bad team . . . how does it feel to be the first SEC West team Mullen has defeated beside Ole MIss?

3. It's pretty well known that Mike Slive was offering blow jobs to get Oklahoma with aTm and not Misery. It was the SEC courting us, not the other way around. That was short lived. OU has no issue playing in an SEC conference, we played in the Big 8 for 40 years when it was making the SEC its bitch still; or do you not recall all the times Oklahoma, Nebraska, Missouri, and Colorado mud stomped teams like Alabama, Allbarn, Florida, LSU, etc. in the Sugar and Orange Bowls? Maybe you forget the Big 8 is the only conference to ever have the final AP and coaches poll top 3 all be from its conference. You probably don't recall the Big 8 easily having the best out of conference records in college football in four of the last six decades. You forget this SEC false hype is a recent occurrence and un-thought of pre 2005. Oklahoma got to hold onto its tier 3 rights and created the Sooner Network in conjunction with FoxSports; an en devour that profits the Oklahoma athletic department more than $12M a year on top of its conference revenue . . . psssssttttt I have my doubts about your ability to comprehend arithmetic so it's easier to just inform you that those two numbers combined create more money for Oklahoma than any SEC program profits from their SEC revenue rights in which your conference still maintains the rights to your tier 3 media. Why would we want to give up generating more revenue than any of the programs in the SEC generate?

As for the farm comments . . . I am proud I spent many of my springs and summers working on ranches (do you even know the difference between a ranch and a farm?) that family members owned (especially my grandfather), but I also grew up in and went to school in one of the largest metro areas in the country (The San Antonio-Austin I-40 corridor). The University of Oklahoma is located in a suburb of a million+ person metro area, Allbarn really is nestled in the backwoods of the southern Alabama sticks. But what I find most disturbing about the comment is that non-graduate fan of a real agriculture/farm boy and veterinarian school (Allbarn) is running farm boy smack to the guy who actually has a degree from a professional school. It probably shouldn't shock me that you're unfamiliar with AllBARN's curriculum considering you couldn't get in and haven't ever seen a college course in your entire life. What's even more sad than that is the guy with a professional degree is still more qualified and experienced at performing the occupations and tasks that AllBARN focuses on educating their students to perform than the layman self-proclaimed fan of the agricultural centered farm boy school.

You're dismissed; feel free to go back to bragging about how you vacation down here at your Uncle Bubba's shit hole on Holiday Isle where we segregate the trash from the rest of our community so they can block the hurricane winds out there on the sinking peninsula while we gate in our new homes and subdivisions from the ilk.

this.

SunCoastSooner wrote: 1. You're the only one who ever brings up such a subject and you claim other's are the bitter ones; that's pretty rich.

also, fatty just got rolled. bwah. cue faggot, shit, cocksucker, poop, feces, y'all want to live in dixie smack.

Stay down, tubby. It's not going to get any better.

SunCoastSooner wrote:Yes, please do go look at the box scores dimwit . . . Ole Miss played at home (Oklahoma played in El Paso), gave up more yards than Oklahoma did even with UTEP's best offensive player sitting the game out (Jefferies). Ole Piss averaged fewer yards per play than Oklahoma did. Ole Piss gave up more first downs (17 > 13). UTEP's QBs went 27 of 40 passing the ball; compared to going 7 of 26 against Oklahoma. Ole Piss didn't have a 100 yard receiver which Oklahoma did with Kenny Stills and his 121 yards. Ole MIss' leading rusher had a whopping 9 more yards than Oklahoma's leading rusher (a second string back who came in after Whaley bruised his shoulder) who averaged 11.6 yards a carry (that would be 3.2 more yards than Ole Piss' leading rusher). Ole Piss gave up 10 points to the El Paso offense, Oklahoma gave up 0/Zero/nil/goose egg. I'm convinced you were probably looking at Allbarn's pathetic box score in . . . well pick either game they have played.

Maybe, but Oklahoma still fucked me over in the Pick'Em against UTEP. :brad:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:Yes, please do go look at the box scores dimwit . . . Ole Miss played at home (Oklahoma played in El Paso), gave up more yards than Oklahoma did even with UTEP's best offensive player sitting the game out (Jefferies). Ole Piss averaged fewer yards per play than Oklahoma did. Ole Piss gave up more first downs (17 > 13). UTEP's QBs went 27 of 40 passing the ball; compared to going 7 of 26 against Oklahoma. Ole Piss didn't have a 100 yard receiver which Oklahoma did with Kenny Stills and his 121 yards. Ole MIss' leading rusher had a whopping 9 more yards than Oklahoma's leading rusher (a second string back who came in after Whaley bruised his shoulder) who averaged 11.6 yards a carry (that would be 3.2 more yards than Ole Piss' leading rusher). Ole Piss gave up 10 points to the El Paso offense, Oklahoma gave up 0/Zero/nil/goose egg. I'm convinced you were probably looking at Allbarn's pathetic box score in . . . well pick either game they have played.

Maybe, but Oklahoma still fucked me over in the Pick'Em against UTEP. :brad:

Hey, I got screwed there too. But I'm not living in an assparty fantasy land that the game was ever in doubt against a team who couldn't score a single offensive point the entire game like our resident papaasswipe.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:
1. You're the only one who ever brings up such a subject and you claim others are the bitter ones; that's pretty rich. Feel free to keep projecting because you're right, nobody is fooled; I'm sure it is crystal clear why you feel the need to be so obsessed with it.

It's brought up, because it is fact. People 'round here don't want to hear a prick crying about OU - especially when they get beat in the games that matter every year. :)

Yes, it is my alma mater that loses meaningful games every season. That's exactly why my alma mater averages a national title every 11.2 years as opposed to the school who your only claim to affiliation to is by buying a Tshirt from Wal-Mart with their logo on's spectacular 50+ years in between national titles. That's exactly why Oklahoma's winning percentage since 2000 is 82% (the best among all BCS conference schools) and AllBARN's 70% (while playing fewer games against FCS schools and mid-major opponents). Good luck convincing anyone except yourself of the accuracy of that statement.

2. I didn't think this would need to be explained but obviously your grasp of the game is lacking. Oklahoma was on the road and used the clock more. Its defense was dominating the game. They sat on the ball longer and ran clock. Oklahoma had fewer total yards but also averaged more yards per play than Ole MIss. Oklahoma used the UTEP game as a tune up where it played and got game experience for as many players as possible. Ole Miss used the game to play its starters exclusively and try to run up a score on a lower tier team; unsuccessfully at that.

Fail. You presented biased assessments and were thwarted with facts. Ole Piss played better against UTEP than Oklahomo did.

I understand that expecting someone who only has a GED to understand the definitions of "fact" and "biased assessment" is probably asking a little too much but allow me help you since I obviously have a much firmer grasp of the English language than yourself. It is a fact that Oklahoma did not give up a single offensive point against UTEP. It is a fact that Oklahoma won on the road by a larger margin than Ole Miss won at home against UTEP. It is a fact that Oklahoma's first and second string runningbacks averaged more yards per carry than than Ole Miss' first and second string runningbacks. It is a fact that Oklahoma had a wide receiver gain over a hundred yards receiving and Ole Miss did not against UTEP. It is a fact that UTEP's quarterbacks completed 26 of 40 passes against Ole Miss but only completed 7 of 26 against Oklahoma. These are all facts.

It is biased assessment to make a statement that "Oklahoma should have lost to UTEP." It is biased assessment to make the statement "Ole MIss beat UTEP worse than Oklahoma." These statements are all conjecture, speculation, biased assessments.

I know I probably jumped into this too quickly for you given your level of intellect. I probably should have started with something more rudimentary such as the alphabet but I didn't think we had time to reteach you what you should have learned in grammar school like the rest of us did.

The SEC's worst team? I couldn't tell by the records, that looks like Allbarn and Vanderbilt every time I look at the standings. But while we are on the subject of being a bad team . . . how does it feel to be the first SEC West team Mullen has defeated beside Ole MIss?

Where did I mention that Auburn was the best team in the SEC?

Here we are back to basic comprehension skills, again. The entire basis of this thread was the discussion of the SEC, as a whole, being overrated and over-hyped. Is AllBARN not a member of the Southeastern Conference? Did AllBARN not begin the year ranked in the top 25? Are they not now 0-2? Did I not already point out to you that AllBARN was a prime example of the original statement and exhibit "A"? These are basic and simple concepts to grasp but once again I doubt anyone here is shocked to witness you unable to comprehend them.

3. It's pretty well known that Mike Slive was offering blow jobs to get Oklahoma with aTm and not Misery. It was the SEC courting us, not the other way around. That was short lived. OU has no issue playing in an SEC conference, we played in the Big 8 for 40 years when it was making the SEC its bitch still; or do you not recall all the times Oklahoma, Nebraska, Missouri, and Colorado mud stomped teams like Alabama, Allbarn, Florida, LSU, etc. in the Sugar and Orange Bowls? Maybe you forget the Big 8 is the only conference to ever have the final AP and coaches poll top 3 all be from its conference. You probably don't recall the Big 8 easily having the best out of conference records in college football in four of the last six decades. You forget this SEC false hype is a recent occurrence and un-thought of pre 2005. Oklahoma got to hold onto its tier 3 rights and created the Sooner Network in conjunction with FoxSports; an en devour that profits the Oklahoma athletic department more than $12M a year on top of its conference revenue . . . psssssttttt I have my doubts about your ability to comprehend arithmetic so it's easier to just inform you that those two numbers combined create more money for Oklahoma than any SEC program profits from their SEC revenue rights in which your conference still maintains the rights to your tier 3 media. Why would we want to give up generating more revenue than any of the programs in the SEC generate?

It's called "chickenshit". It's okay, though. We ended up with far classier schools (A&M & Mizzou).

Making intelligent decisions based on tradition and finances is chicken shit? Oklahoma is one of only 14 schools whose athletic department turns a profit every year. I am assuming you're in debt and going bankrupt just like the AllBARN athletic department currently is to the tune of more than $3M a year.

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2010 ... abama.html

Doesn't look like AllBARN football will be funding any new tractors for the Ag school any time soon like Oklahoma's funds the university's library system.

As for the farm comments . . . I am proud I spent many of my springs and summers working on ranches

I didn't read past that. Didn't need to.

That's not shocking given your attention span and the fact that most of it was written above a fourth grade reading comprehension level.

You're dismissed; feel free to go back to bragging about how you vacation down here at your Uncle Bubba's shit hole on Holiday Isle where we segregate the trash from the rest of our community so they can block the hurricane winds out there on the sinking peninsula while we gate in our new homes and subdivisions from the ilk.

The whole area is a broke shithole now. The fact that condos were going for $1.3 mill a few years ago, and are NOW going for $150k pretty much says it all.

There was no construction on Holiday Isle "just a few years ago." Holiday Isle has been fully developed since the mid 1990s. The most recent condominium construction on Holiday Isle was completed in 1996 and their prices there never even approached a million dollars much less $1.3M. You must have that, accurately portrayed shit hole (where we settle the dregs such as your family as cannon fodder for the hurricanes), with the stretch of land ten miles to the east called Miramar Beach where the more refined, educated, and wealthier social classes (such as myself) reside. But even in Miramar the Condominiums (other than penthouses which still do go for close to $2M a pop ) never were a MIllion+. There were single family residences that easily cleared the seven figure range "just a few years ago" and still do.

Papa Willie wrote:

M Club wrote:this.

SunCoastSooner wrote: 1. You're the only one who ever brings up such a subject and you claim other's are the bitter ones; that's pretty rich.

also, fatty just got rolled. bwah. cue faggot, shit, cocksucker, poop, feces, y'all want to live in dixie smack.

If anybody was more overrated than the 'Homo, it was your suck school. Air Force almost fucking beat you. Plus - you live in the Far East, so you live in a tube of slant-cum.

And yet Michigan is 1-1 while AllBARN has yet to win a single game . . . or even threaten to do so.

I'm not yet convinced that Auburn has even played one damn good team, but I know they haven't played two. Mississippi St is absolutely no one's idea of good. Damned? Sure. But definitely not good.

Oh, and...

SCS wrote:You're dismissed; feel free to go back to yada yada...

Smack Fail. Once you've dismissed someone, you don't add to it. That's like continuing your point after writing "EOS."

Bad form.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote: And yet Michigan is 1-1 while AllBARN has yet to win a single game . . . or even threaten to do so.

Auburn has played 2 damned good teams. Your team? USLUT and Florida Anal & Machine?

Two good games? Mississippi State who hasn't finished higher than fifth in their division in six years is suddenly a "good game?"

Maybe by Auburn standards.

Papa Willie wrote:

M Club wrote:this.

SunCoastSooner wrote: 1. You're the only one who ever brings up such a subject and you claim other's are the bitter ones; that's pretty rich.

also, fatty just got rolled. bwah. cue faggot, shit, cocksucker, poop, feces, y'all want to live in dixie smack.

If anybody was more overrated than the 'Homo, it was your suck school. Air Force almost fucking beat you. Plus - you live in the Far East, so you live in a tube of slant-cum.

encouraging to see you italicized the obvious, that af almost beat michigan. suppose so, within a td and all, though not as if they actually threatened when they had the chance to take the lead. not going to complain either with only a week to train for some wonky triple-option none of the players have ever seen, especially considering air force runs up and down the field on just about every bcs team they face.

i'll start worrying just as soon as we start almost losing to the auburns of the world, not the air forces.

schmick wrote: Only douche bags with nothing going for them in life refer to a team that they do not play on or work for as "we"

it's just them against the world. well them and the 100,000+ who don't dump their season tickets as soon as they drop a game. or the million other people watching at home. or anyone else who's financial support enables the university to field a team.

'Spray, M Club isn't teaming up with schmick there, he's mocking him.

Papa Willie wrote:

M Club wrote:

schmick wrote: Only douche bags with nothing going for them in life refer to a team that they do not play on or work for as "we"

it's just them against the world. well them and the 100,000+ who don't dump their season tickets as soon as they drop a game. or the million other people watching at home. or anyone else who's financial support enables the university to field a team.

Figures you'd team up with one of the most mentally unstable posters on any board. Perhaps he'll let you go 3 way with he and his son if you ever actually come back to live here... PS: Nobody from the SEC started this thread - just another jealous dude did...

Bwah, outstanding. You should probably give the 3rd grade another go and then read that again. Try a northern school this time.

0-2, fatty.

Van wrote:'Spray, M Club isn't teaming up with schmick there, he's mocking him.

He has enough trouble grasping simple definitions and you think he is going to be able to grasp sarcasm?

Can't say I didn't warn you, 'Spray.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:Can't say I didn't warn you, 'Spray.

About Tom Dempsey?

http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 73#p806573

SunCoastSooner wrote: You're a long shot to get bowl eligible. If the season in Norman were that bleak I would be less worried about crying about teams who actually deserve to be ranked somewhere in the top twenty-five and more concerned with what players you can buy, specifically quarterbacks (again) and Olinemen, with all that recruiting time you'll have in December and January so maybe you can be relevant again at some point.

P.S. The subject was the SEC being overhyped and overrated this year . . . and your school is a prime example and exhibit "A" for the argument.

I guess the AllBARN folk already had this in mind.

http://capstonereport.com/2012/08/09/tr ... urn/17157/

Roy Adams is a character. The longtime University of Tennessee supporter doesn’t hide his love for the Volunteers, and isn’t bashful about the love and affection he has for Memphis high school football.

Adams, known also online as “Tennstud”, has a long, infamous relationship with the University of Alabama, finding himself at the center of the Albert Means investigation, an NCAA inquiry that eventually sent Alabama football into the abyss for a decade. The man is eccentric, maybe a little unbalanced. But if anything, he is plugged in to what’s happening in the Memphis area.

Now Tennstud has more to say regarding the “buying and selling” of another Memphis athlete, but this time the warm lights have shifted to the other side of the state.

Apparently, according to Adams, Auburn has gone after Memphis area runningback Javon Robinson $cam Newton style. Last night he had this to say:

“As many of you know, the recruitment of highly touted Wooddale HS rb, Javon Robinson, has been the subject of several posts on this board re: him riding around town in a new Dodge sports car, approx $30,000, with Auburn flags flying on the auto. In fact, I was hosting several Memphis high school coaches during the Memphis Grizzlies playoff run and was standing in line, (yes, I stand in line!) at Second & Beale in front of Blues City Rest. when Javon approached the red light in the auto, much to the chagrin of the Memphis high school coaches present.

“Well today, according to a most highly reputable source, the NCAA entered Wooddale with several folks investigating Javon Robinson. There’s a rumor that some $135,000 was deposited in one individual’s account and he wrote the check for the auto. The single parent mother had been telling folks she inherited $$$. Things are getting hot!


“I’m supposed to know more this evening and if it’s pertinent, interesting, I shall post. Now please, please, I have NO doubt about any of this but DON’T run to Tunica and bet that Auburn shall be given severe penalities as this is all second hand!

“Yes, more opportunity to tarnish Memphis’ well deserved reputation of paying $$$ to recruits. At least in this instance, the high school coaches weren’t involved! Big Sam Henderson coaches at Wooddale and is clean as the driven snow. So is the head football coach, Keith Spann. Both great individuals, coaches, and deserving of positive accolades!

“They told the young man he was stupid, wrong, to be driving around town with those Auburn flags blazing!”

So did the NCAA visit Wooddale High School yesterday to investigate Auburn’s recruitment of Robinson by Auburn? That’s what “Tennstud” is alledging. But is it true?

I’ll put it to you this way:

There are as many people in the world that believe OJ Simpson’s not guilty verdict in the murder trial of his wife and her lover that believe Auburn’s not guilty verdict in the Cam Newton saga.

So if this kind of thing could happen “once” down there (I almost typed that with a straight face), it’s not rocket science to assume it could happen again. In the war of public perception, even the mosted hedged-in defendant eventually loses footing when perception shifts.

In this regard, eventually, the heat caught up with OJ, a man whose reckless and odd behavior eventually landed him in prison for other crimes. Is it now getting hot in Auburn after similar behavior and results now on the way? With several storylines still swirling regarding “interesting” recruiting developments this off season by a staff committed to doing whatever it takes, how long can they hold up?

We’ll see. The story may be nothing. People inherit hundreds of thousands of dollars and buy their top high school athletes sports cars every day.

But in this case, if the driving glove fits, it may be legit.

Papa Willie wrote:

Congrats on finding something that happened more than three decades ago to deflect what is happening at AllBARN currently.

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... 73#p806573

Bake me a pie.

Trying to get rid of the taste of the shit sammich you've been force fed throughout this thread?

So let me get this straight . . . The conference who has the fourth best out of conference winning percentage this season among the six BCS conferences is undeniably the best conference in the country.

A conference who just had one its one loss teams get their dicks dragged through the mud by Texas in their own house is clearly the best conference in the country?

A conference who has dropped homes games to Louisiana-Monroe and Western Kentucky is supposed to be the unanimous selection as the toughest conference in the country?

Pookie just called and he wants his rock back.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:So let me get this straight . . . The conference who has the fourth best out of conference winning percentage this season among the six BCS conferences is undeniably the best conference in the country.

A conference who just had one its one loss teams get their dicks dragged through the mud by Texas in their own house is clearly the best conference in the country?

A conference who has dropped homes games to Louisiana-Monroe and Western Kentucky is supposed to be the unanimous selection as the toughest conference in the country?

Pookie just called and he wants his rock back.

Where did I say the SEC is the best conference right now?




Weird. You certainly sound like you were pulling for Texas. I didn't think you Big 12 folks did that shit?

Strange, because to me, and anyone rational, it probably sounds like I made an accurate observation of the outcome of the game.

Papa Willie wrote:

SunCoastSooner wrote:So let me get this straight . . . The conference who has the fourth best out of conference winning percentage this season among the six BCS conferences is undeniably the best conference in the country.

A conference who just had one its one loss teams get their dicks dragged through the mud by Texas in their own house is clearly the best conference in the country?

A conference who has dropped homes games to Louisiana-Monroe and Western Kentucky is supposed to be the unanimous selection as the toughest conference in the country?

Pookie just called and he wants his rock back.

Where did I say the SEC is the best conference right now?




Weird. You certainly sound like you were pulling for Texas. I didn't think you Big 12 folks did that shit?

Strange, because to me, and anyone rational, it probably sounds like I made an accurate observation of the outcome of the game.

schmick wrote:Only douche bags with nothing going for them in life refer to a team that they do not play on or work for as "we"

And only morons with absolutely zero perspective whatsoever as to the real world refer to an opposing team at the youth sports level as "the enemy."