T1B

ND wont make it out of Norman unscathed.

Texas at 2 is a fuckin joke considering theyll prob lose 2 of thier next 4.


Spray! Do you even WATCH btcfb, brotha??



Oh wait, you were joos keeding right?

The coaches know better than to piss off the Dark Lord or mess with the enchanted Louisiana Bumblefukk.

The media on the other hand...

Be so kind as to not burn any buildings or vehicles this year.

bammerfan is the one who teabagged your (typical) drunk.

The SEC ball sucking has officially reached epic proportions.

Are these media fuckers who have votes even watching any college football this season?

Mississippi State deserves to be in the top 25? Are you fucking kidding me that a team who almost lost at home Saturday to a 1-2 Sun Belt teams is more deserving of jumping into the top 25 . . .

Northwestern is 3-0 and played all three games against other BCS teams (including one from the SEC) and gets left out for Miss Stake?

Baylor who hasn't had a team come within three touchdowns of them sits out for a team that barely escaped at home to a 1-2 Sun Belt team?

I really wants to hear all the SEC ball sucking homer excuses next weekend when Baylor goes out Friday night and beats the brakes off Louisiana-Monroe.

Papa Willie wrote: Sorry, Mikey - I just don't see Stanford at #9 yet.

Still pretty early to get a good read on anything. But then again you (and M2 for that matter) don't count.

:wink:

'Spray, why on earth shouldn't Stanford be in the Top Ten? They're 3-0, they're coming off two straight BCS bowl game appearances, and no other team has anywhere near as big of a win this season. Oregon, Florida St, OU, South Carolina and WVU haven't even played a real game yet. How can you possibly be okay with South Carolina in the Top Ten but not Stanford?

Van wrote:'How can you possibly be okay with South Carolina in the Top Ten but not Stanford?

It's mind blowing that southern Carolina is even in the top 25 (SEC bias) let alone the top 10.


They were a missed PI call from losing to Vanderbilt.

The same Vanderbilt team that a week later got smoked by Northwestern.


Unreal

Papa Willie wrote:

Van wrote:'Spray, why on earth shouldn't Stanford be in the Top Ten? They're 3-0, they're coming off two straight BCS bowl game appearances, and no other team has anywhere near as big of a win this season. Oregon, Florida St, OU, South Carolina and WVU haven't even played a real game yet. How can you possibly be okay with South Carolina in the Top Ten but not Stanford?

They almost lost to San Jose State, Van. SJS had more yards, and Stanford had to win it with a FG in the 4th. While I certainly agree they've improved, that first game was a nasty stain as far as I'm concerned.

PS: You're PAC12BSHomering.

But struggling against Vanderbilt and Buffalo are perfectly acceptable.

'Spray, what do you think South Carolina did against Vandy?

Go ahead and name me one significant win by any of those teams I mentioned. I can show you where they have a ton of wins against D1-AA teams such as James Madison, Savannah St and Tennessee Tech, not to mention a slew of Arkansas St's and other bottom-feeders, but where do you see anything else along the lines of a win against USC?

Stanford is 3-0 aganst D1 teams, including a key win over the #2 team in the country. That resume simply blows away anything anyone else has done so far this season, with only ND coming close. Teams such as South Carolina that did nothing last year or this year? In your world, how do they even rate at all?

Papa Willie wrote:

M2 wrote:It's mind blowing that southern Carolina is even in the top 25 (SEC bias) let alone the top 10.


They were a missed PI call from losing to Vanderbilt.

The same Vanderbilt team that a week later got smoked by Northwestern.


Unreal

Pac12BSH at it's finest.

That's funny... I didn't even mention the PAC 12 or a team from the PAC 12.


But carry on... it's pretty funny watching you try and justify why a horrible team(south carolina) is in your top 10 just because they're in the SEC.