if he doesn't, will you decide to vote for the cult guy?
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:17 am
by War Wagon
Jsc810 wrote:Wow. Obama opens up kicking ass.
If this debate continues on like this, it will be the knockout punch.
sure thing, champ.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:29 am
by jiminphilly
I was hoping they'd throw down. This is why they need Jerry Springer as the moderator.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:53 am
by Carson
Oboohoo's strategy is to call Romney a liar over and over.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:56 am
by MuchoBulls
jiminphilly wrote:I was hoping they'd throw down. This is why they need Jerry Springer as the moderator.
This. That bitch should have let them go a couple of different times because things were getting good.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:02 am
by Van
The one thing Obama keeps talking about that really grates is his constant mantra of the jobs he's created and the supposed reduction in the unemployment rate, while completely overlooking the fact that countless people have simply given up on looking for work due to a lack of decent job opportunities. Also, all the out-of-work small business owners who never qualified for unemployment aren't included in his figures, and how many small businesses have failed in recent years?
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:03 am
by Y2K
Osama is dead and GM is alive!
sincerely
JSC
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:13 am
by trev
Jsc810 wrote:Wow. Obama opens up kicking ass.
If this debate continues on like this, it will be the knockout punch.
Nice troll job, chap.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:14 am
by Wolfman
What's that humming sound? Oh, I know---it's the assembly lines at the Chevy Volt plant.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:25 am
by Van
Obama at least seems awake this time but he's still getting his ass kicked on the facts. His record on the economy makes Romney's job here similar to shooting fish in a barrel, and he's not missing.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:27 am
by MuchoBulls
Jsc810 wrote:LOL the crowd laughed at Romney.
I'd rather see that than the crowd clapping for Obama asking for the transcript about how long he took to call what happened in Libya an act of terror.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:32 am
by trev
I keep hearing Obama say the things he wants to do to improve the economy. Didn't he say that 4 years ago?
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:34 am
by Van
One area where Romney dropped the ball was in letting Obama off the hook regarding the audience member's canned question about the attack in Libya. The guy's question was specifically about the embassy's request to Obama for help prior to the attack, and all Obama did was talk about his actions following the attack. Romney should have made Obama answer the question, then he should have drilled it home.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:36 am
by MuchoBulls
Van wrote:Romney should have made Obama answer the question, then he should have drilled it home.
Obama dodge numerous questions tonight, even those directly asked by Romney.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:42 am
by lovebuzz
88 wrote:They should let them throw down like Kid Rock and that dude from Fast Times at Ridgemont High.
Weirdest, creepiest PSA ever.
Douchebags galore.
ps: no, I don't think Obama was flailing any more than Romneybot.
shame on me.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:44 am
by Y2K
Jsc810 wrote:Pretty sure we'll see the polls showing an Obama victory tonight.
Nice try champ..
Obama did much better this time but admitting he's a cover up artist didn't go over well.
I go with a tie at best.
At least Barry showed up for this one.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:47 am
by Moving Sale
88 wrote: The fact checkers are going to kick his ass tomorrow.
Why wait? Go ahead and tell us wtf you are talking about.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:48 am
by War Wagon
Jsc810 wrote:Pretty sure we'll see the polls showing an Obama victory tonight.
I'm sure you do.
You don't really have a take on the actual substance of the debate, just that your guy won.
Quite the Rhodes scholar, Mikey is giving you high 5's for such insight.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:49 am
by Y2K
BTW--nobody's buying his bullshit this time...Romney made great points of his horseshit from the last time around with McCain.. You can only promise shit you can deliver is what people are looking for.
Hope and change
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:49 am
by MuchoBulls
Jsc810 wrote:Even the talking heads on Fox are saying "Obama had a really strong debate."
That much was evident, but I won't go as far as saying Obama won the debate.
He won the avoiding direct questions portion for sure.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:51 am
by Van
Jsc810 wrote:Even the talking heads on Fox are saying "Obama had a really strong debate."
Compared to the first one, sure. No one is saying he dominated tonight, or won convincingly. No one. Everyone agreed that Obama get his head kicked in last time.
I seriously doubt that tonight's debate changed anyone's mind.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:53 am
by Y2K
Jsc810 wrote:Even the talking heads on Fox are saying "Obama had a really strong debate."
So fucking what?
You can't be this stupid Chip
Of course he did well ...
He had to.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:53 am
by mvscal
Jsc810 wrote:mmmm...errrm..yeah..fap,fap,fap..gobble..ooooo,yeah..nom,nom,um..yeah, Barry..give it to me...skeet,skeet,skeet..spurt, gobble...FUCK YEAH...cum on my face, Barry, yeah!!!
FTFY
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:54 am
by Moving Sale
Van wrote:Obama ... [is] ...getting his ass kicked on the facts.
How so?
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:56 am
by Carson
Chip, The Conference does not approve.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:00 am
by Van
TVO wrote:
Van wrote:Obama ... [is] ...getting his ass kicked on the facts.
How so?
His campaign promises regarding the economy during the run up to the '08 election vis a vis his utter failure to deliver on those promises: specifically, the exploding debt and the ridiculous unemployment numbers.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:01 am
by Y2K
Jsc810 wrote:Obama is leading the polls today.
One week from today, that lead will be larger.
Just go with that Sparky...
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:02 am
by Carson
Bobby Jindal just tore Obozo a new asshole on CNN.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:03 am
by Van
Just watched that. Christ, Jindal looks straight out of Revenge of the Nerds.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:06 am
by Moving Sale
Van,
Please post what he said during run up to election and at this debate that show he was getting his ass handed to him on the facts.
TIA
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:09 am
by War Wagon
Van wrote:One area where Romney dropped the ball was in letting Obama off the hook regarding the audience member's canned question about the attack in Libya. The guy's question was specifically about the embassy's request to Obama for help prior to the attack, and all Obama did was talk about his actions following the attack. Romney should have made Obama answer the question, then he should have drilled it home.
over a month after the attack, "we're going to get to the bottom of this and find out who's responsible". I'm sure that's of great condolence to Chris Steven's widow.
oh, but Billary has since stepped up and accepted full responsibility, throwing herself under the bus to salvage your meager chances at another 4 years of responsibility.
along with responsibility come consequences for using it incompetently. duh.
President Obama, you forgot to mention that part of being responsible, but voters won't.
The recent episode in Libya just illustrates in bold headlines what a failure you and your sycophantic administration have been for the past 4 years.
Pack your shit
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:10 am
by Van
Moving Sale wrote:Van,
Please post what he said during run up to election and at this debate that show he was getting his ass handed to him on the facts.
TIA
"One and done if I don't get it done during my first term."
Four years later he's grown the debt at a record rate; the very debt he promised to reduce.
Quit being disingenuous.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:12 am
by Van
KC Scott wrote:Obama let slip he'll support an assault weapons ban in 2nd term
He just mobilized the entire NRA
BFD. NRA necks were never going to vote for him anyway. No new news there.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:16 am
by Van
Did I just hear them say that the next and final debate will be about foreign policy?
Good luck with that one, Chip.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:20 am
by MuchoBulls
Van wrote:Did I just hear them say that the next and final debate will be about foreign policy?
Good luck with that one, Chip.
I don't think Romney is that strong on Foreign Policy, but he has enough on his side with Libya and Iran.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:24 am
by Van
KC Scott wrote:
Van wrote:
KC Scott wrote:Obama let slip he'll support an assault weapons ban in 2nd term
He just mobilized the entire NRA
BFD. NRA necks were never going to vote for him anyway. No new news there.
You're assuming they planned to vote to begin with
Don't ever underestimate the power on the NRA, hippie
Again, BFD. NRA necks always get out and vote (stupidly, too, basing their entire vote on one totally worthless vanity issue), they mostly live in Red states, and you could have counted on them voting 100% 'R' long before Obama's opponent in this election was ever even decided.
Stupid necks will vote against Obama and any presidential candidate with a 'D' beside his name every time, just as every fuckmonkey woman who's well past the age of reproduction will vote for Obama and any presidential candidate with a 'D' beside his name.
Those people are already in the bank, for both sides. Their votes are not at issue.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:25 am
by ChargerMike
MuchoBulls wrote:
Jsc810 wrote:Even the talking heads on Fox are saying "Obama had a really strong debate."
That much was evident, but I won't go as far as saying Obama won the debate.
He won the avoiding direct questions portion for sure.
uh especially this one...Mr President, have you looked at YOUR portfolio lately? uh, uh, what's the next question? The next question is: have you looked at your portfolio lately? Huh? wha? uh no I don't have time...Mr. President...YOU have investments in China, Mr. President, YOU have money in off shore accounts, Mr. Presidents, YOU have money in the Caymans.......................uh, uh Ms. moderator, uh what's the next question?
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:26 am
by War Wagon
Jsc810 wrote:Yeah, because Romney did so good on foreign policy, especially on his trip to Europe. Every time he opened his mouth, he offended our allies.
they don't vote in our elections.
You've got nothing and you know it.
Why keep up the charade?
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:40 am
by Van
Jsc810 wrote:Yeah, because Romney did so good on foreign policy, especially on his trip to Europe. Every time he opened his mouth, he offended our allies.
Who cares? They don't have a vote, and much of America resents their armchair QB/ingrate act anyway.
Here in America, you can be certain that he will score major points by hammering Obama regarding his infamous Apology Tour, and you can also be certain that he will not drop the ball again when it comes time to hold Obama accountable for doing nothing about the Libyan consulate's request for more security prior to the attack.
The whole Arab Spring clusterfuck likely won't go too well for Obama either, particularly if Romney has the balls to bring up the constitutionality issue of a president making a unilateral decision to attack Libya.
Lastly, you know Romney will attempt to bring it back to the economy again by decrying China's ascendency at our expense, as well as our lowered credit rating. He will point to America's diminished status as a world power, and he will do so by laying the blame squarely at the feet of Obama's weakening of the United States as a financial leader.
If he doesn't, he's a flat-out idiot.
Re: the second debate
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:42 am
by H4ever
Van wrote:[
Again, BFD. NRA necks always get out and vote (stupidly, too, basing their entire vote on one totally worthless vanity issue), they mostly live in Red states, and you could have counted on them voting 100% 'R' long before Obama's opponent in this election was ever even decided.
Stupid necks will vote against Obama and any presidential candidate with a 'D' beside his name every time, just as every fuckmonkey woman who's well past the age of reproduction will vote for Obama and any presidential candidate with a 'D' beside his name.
Those people are already in the bank, for both sides. Their votes are not at issue.
I think Shit Romney fisted himself when it comes to undecided women and hispanic voters. Good night Mittens....it's good to know your version of Obamacare is working well to this day in MA. Good job governor....perhaps you and McCain can go on a "We got cunt-punted" tour next January.