T1B

I'll just get this out of the way now.

5-5 in the last 10, at least.

Not so fast my friend, nice comeback.

You can only beat us when we suck.

Cross Traffic wrote:Not so fast my friend, nice comeback.

For sure, though seemed like they were trying their best to lose. Denard could have run into FG range on the second-to-last drive but took the 0% shot downfield instead, not to mention burning their second timeout by not getting a play in very quickly. Their two-minute offense looked more like walking a 74-year-old dog in the park on a Sunday. But fuck, I'll take it.

First time in probably eight years I didn't watch MSU-scUM, guess I picked the right suckfest to miss.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:You can only beat us when we suck.

Which is just about every year, forever.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:You can only beat us when we suck.

And you beat up on Michigan when DickRod coached...your point?

Shoalzie wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:You can only beat us when we suck.

And you beat up on Michigan when DickRod coached...your point?

You'd be a boring dinner companion. Think I'd invite Terry over for beers before you.

That game was dumb. Props to UM and all that.

0 touchdowns...4 fucking field goals and still not good enough to win. It is mind blowing how bad this offense is.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:That game was dumb. Props to UM and all that.

0 touchdowns...4 fucking field goals and still not good enough to win. It is mind blowing how bad this offense is.

In the SEC thats called a classic! We should do the rematch in the MNC!

A good, low-scoring game between two Big Ten teams means this week's version of a SEC classic would be something in the neighborhood of 35-31 since 3 yards and a clould of dust is too boring, at least until next week when their most recent installment of GAME OF THE CENTURY ends 7-3 and it's back to OMG SEC defensive speed.