Page 1 of 1
So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 8:35 pm
by Dinsdale
Are you a little more drunk and angry than an hour ago?
56-0 at half?
Why did we invite you to the CoC again?
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:31 pm
by Dinsdale
70-14 in the 3rd, with the scrubs in for most of the game.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:49 pm
by Dinsdale
Papa Willie wrote:Holy fuck! Ya Dins - I'll still have the Ducks @ #1. They will more than likely move up at the end of the day.
Maybe 1 spot in the BCS, if UGA wins.
Doubt too many will vote Oregon over Bama, and KSU played a much tougher opponent(assuming they win).
If Florida wins, Oregon actually loses ground in the BCS... which will correct itself once Oregon starts beating real teams.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:54 pm
by MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
You guys were expecting a nail-biter?
I wish Chip had left the starters in and made a serious attempt to crack 100. Whatever it takes to get Bohn out of Boulder is alright with me.
As for why we got the invite to the Pac, I imagine Larry Scott might've been swayed by the fact that CU immediately became the second winningest program in the conference upon their arrival. Things are pretty bleak right now, but history says this shouldn't last. And the basketball team seems to have settled into the whole "Conference of Champions" routine rather nicely, I'd say. Only 13 days til college hoops!
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:57 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:Only 13 days til college hoops!
Amen, brother.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:00 pm
by Dinsdale
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:As for why we got the invite to the Pac, I imagine Larry Scott might've been swayed by the fact that CU immediately became the second winningest program in the conference upon their arrival.
They're the worst team in PAC history.
I'm guessing he was more swayed by the size of the media market, no?
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:18 pm
by King Crimson
Dinsdale wrote:MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:As for why we got the invite to the Pac, I imagine Larry Scott might've been swayed by the fact that CU immediately became the second winningest program in the conference upon their arrival.
They're the worst team in PAC history.
I'm guessing he was more swayed by the size of the media market, no?
CU is pretty bad this year but Mike is right. CU is a top 25 type all time football program. Oregon is not.
and CU DID win the Pac tournament last year and an NCAA game.
Denver is not a great college tv market though. i've lived here for 20 years and i see Oklahoma (and Texas) play more on TV than CU....on the big boy networks
CU has a lot of merit as a conference partner....more in the Pac than the Big Whatever. Utah is the ugly duckling.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:24 pm
by Dinsdale
Army used to be really good at football, too.
I'm sure you must have had a point.
(All ribbing aside, I'm glad to have CU aboard.)
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:36 pm
by M2
Dinsdale wrote:They're the worst team in PAC history.
I have no idea why Cal needs to be brought up in this thread.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:39 pm
by M2
King Crimson wrote: Utah is the ugly duckling.
They better not be tonight in Salt Lake City !
My plan is working well... and I don't need a bunch of fucking Mormons fucking things up for me.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:40 pm
by Dinsdale
Sorry, M2 -- Kal isn't in the same nonclass as CU. Not even close.
Lose to a FCS and get back to me.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:00 pm
by Dinsdale
Papa Willie wrote:Florida is playing like they should be ranked about about #103 right now.
I agree. Must mean Georgia is at least #90.
SECSECSECSEC!!!!!!!!!!
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:38 pm
by Bucmonkey
Some day the Ducks will do something worthwhile Dins, in the mean time don't quit drinking.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:51 pm
by Dinsdale
Yeah, winning 3 straight conference titles and going to 3 straight BCS bowls isn't "worthwhile," since several teams are on the same roll...
Oh wait... zero other teams are in the same boat.
You are a moron of the highest order, a streak that's lasted much longer than Oregon's PAC dominance.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:54 pm
by Bucmonkey
Cheers slush.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:08 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Do you mean "lush?"
Are you drunk?
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:11 am
by Dinsdale
You didn't notice his pattern of misspelling of common words?
At least he was able to keep a two word post down to one... a .500 average is outstanding for him... since he's none-too-bright.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:16 am
by Dinsdale
M2 wrote:My plan is working well... and I don't need a bunch of fucking Mormons fucking things up for me.
Letting them house a kickoff was a pretty good plan.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 4:53 am
by Dinsdale
M2 wrote:My plan is working well... and I don't need a bunch of fucking Mormons fucking things up for me.
BEATINGS!
OUCH!
Just keep your mitts off Aliotti.
Re: So, Mike...
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 11:17 am
by The Seer
M2 wrote:Dinsdale wrote:They're the worst team in PAC history.
I have no idea why Cal needs to be brought up in this thread.
Uhhh, Kal stomped UCLA 43-17....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64c31/64c3119960d80f788222721b630862543af31de0" alt="Embarassed :oops:"