Polls are now open

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:54 pm

We've analyzed it, parsed it, argued it, and cussed it.

The progressives bitch about the conservative bent to the Board, while the right-wingers growl that there are too many damn libs in here.

Put up or shut up. Obama or Romney. Like the national election, write-ins are as good as no vote at all.

Oh, and to our foreign constituency: You too are welcome to participate in this remarkable process that America has given the free world.

Make your voice heard, T1B!

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Nov 03, 2012 2:20 pm

Romney

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:13 pm

Barack Hussein Obama abandoned some good decent men to a horrible death. He's a coward & a liar. And a shameful man. Let's be done with him.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:30 pm

Gary Johnson

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:52 pm

Martyred wrote:Romney

Oh, I see you workin'. You're just agitating for anarchy. You would've made a fine American, Comrade...

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:54 pm

Ron Paul

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:02 pm

Ana's dog.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:02 pm

sucker wrote: Barack Hussein Obama abandoned some good decent men to a horrible death.

unsmart

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:08 pm

Wolfman wrote: Barack Hussein Obama abandoned some good decent men to a horrible death. He's a coward & a liar. And a shameful man. Let's be done with him.

How can an otherwise intelligent man post something so utterly retarded?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:23 pm

BSmack wrote:
Wolfman wrote: Barack Hussein Obama abandoned some good decent men to a horrible death. He's a coward & a liar. And a shameful man. Let's be done with him.
How can an otherwise intelligent man post something so utterly retarded?

Because it's true?

Why are the line-toers so blinded by a single letter that they're in such deep denial of facts?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:37 pm

Truman wrote:
Martyred wrote:Romney
Oh, I see you workin'. You're just agitating for anarchy. You would've made a fine American, Comrade...

Not quite. I am genuinely disappointed that Obama didn't deliver on the socialism as I anticipated.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:56 pm

none of the above

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:57 pm

sucker wrote:
How can an otherwise intelligent man post something so utterly retarded?

Because it's true?

nope

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 5:04 pm

Felix wrote:none of the above

2rd.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:00 pm

KC Scott wrote:Romney is closer to Fiscal Conservative / Social Moderate than Obama,

which Romney? the one who was governor? the one who got the GOP nomination? the one who is running now?

trev · Post by **trev** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:17 pm

I contemplated writing in Ron Paul, but I will probably vote Romney. Not that it matters in California.

I'd like to know who voted for Obama 4 years ago and is now voting for someone else.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:35 pm

KC Scott wrote:the one who was Governor

he has already refuted all that he accomplished as governor. and the GOP House wouldn't let him do any of the things he would do as governor.

the man you are voting for doesn't exist anymore. try again.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:35 pm

trev wrote:Not that it matters in California.

gets it

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:52 pm

KC Scott wrote:you must be swayed a lot more by social issues than the economy then.

the economy that the GOP fucked and then claims that Obama couldn't fix in 4 years so they promise to fix it in 8 more. Romney promises to fix it in 8 years and cries that Obama hasn't been able to fix it in the first four after the fall. you think this is logical?

check the past; GOP don't fix economies.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:09 pm

Dinsdale wrote:
BSmack wrote:
Wolfman wrote: Barack Hussein Obama abandoned some good decent men to a horrible death. He's a coward & a liar. And a shameful man. Let's be done with him.
How can an otherwise intelligent man post something so utterly retarded?

Because it's true?

Why are the line-toers so blinded by a single letter that they're in such deep denial of facts?

What facts?

trev · Post by **trev** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:15 pm

Who is going to add up our electoral votes? That would be interesting.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:25 pm

KC Scott wrote:Bace

My definition of "fixing the economy" is who has a better plan to put people back to work

Romney wants to lower the Corp tax rate from 35% to 25% - this will spur hiring.
He wants to make the Bush tax cuts permenant and roll back federal healthcare mandate which will spur hiring

Obama's plan is for Govt. spending to put people back to work (roads and bridges is the mantra)
Everything else he wants to do (education, enviornment, healthcare) all is based on Govt spending

Do you honestly believe Govt. Spending will fix the economy?

do you honestly think the entirety of their respective plans boil down to these items?

do you honestly think the president has that much effect on the economy?

and haven't you noticed a boatload of economists saying that Romney's numbers don't add up? haven't you noticed people saying his plan will never work? haven't you seen the people bringing up that "magic" is a major component of his plan to fix the economy? and his inability to provide specifics gives you confidence in his abilities?

Romney has a five point plan. five very vague points. no specifics. just general principles that have not proven to grow jobs or economies.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:31 pm

KC Scott wrote:I noticed you didn't answer the question

question is moot. obama's plan is not government spending and romney's plan is not lower corp tax rate. there is more to them. to think that is the entirety is to be uninformed or an ignorant child.

take this seriously.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:40 pm

KC Scott wrote:...or you want to rely on the private sector to grow jobs

What is the incentive for this amazing "private sector" to keep jobs in America?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:44 pm

KC Scott wrote:I've broken it down to basics

no. the campaign did this. and you bought into it. it is a false choice. you should stretch your patience and go deeper. you may have a general "feeling" that you've got the hang of this, but you're just too impatient or simple to do more.

even if we agreed to your one concept, show me where the GOP has made major dents in lowering government spending? all the previous administrations did the opposite. in fact, Obama has drastically lowered the rate in which the government spends cash. did you read that part? going back to Kennedy the rate of government spending always increases, GOP candidates included. only modern history president to lower the rate of gov spending more than Obama was Eisenhower. so, what was your argument about Obama again?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:45 pm

KC Scott wrote:
Yes it's is

I said it wasn't the only aspect of his plan, dummy.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:48 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:Romney has a five point plan. five very vague points. no specifics. just general principles that have not proven to grow jobs or economies.

Romney has a proven track record of success at growing business.

Unfortunately for your ilk, Obama has a track record also. 4 years of abject failure at delivering on even one of his bullshit hope and change promises, except for forcing a ridiculous healthcare plan down the American peoples throat while he had a majority in both houses.

How'd that work out for him? A year later, there was a massive repudiation of Dems on both the national and local level. You think Americans really want 4 more years of this?

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:54 pm

Looks like the poll shows a ass kicking landslide for Romney to me.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:06 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:going back to Kennedy the rate of government spending always increases, GOP candidates included. only modern history president to lower the rate of gov spending more than Obama was Eisenhower.

Hit your head this morning?

Back up and take another run at that one, and on the second attempt, try to make sense by not contradicting one sentence in the very next sentence.

Obama has drastically lowered the rate in which the government spends cash.

If you squint really, really hard, you can almost see a little tiny dip in the graph... I guess that's "drastic."

But wait -- don't you locksteppers claim that the GOP has blocked everything Obummer has done? Maybe that reduced the rate of spending?

You've really got both sides of your mouth running in overdrive... which is what locksteppers do to try and justify their blinders.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:14 pm

War Wagon wrote: Romney has a proven track record of success at growing business.

what does that have to do with a nation's economy? seriously? if 80% of the businesses Romney took over turned around, and the other 20% became government disaster areas with the taxpayers cleaning up afterwards, what does that have to do with an entire nation's economy? there is no correlation.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:15 pm

Dinsdale wrote: But wait -- don't you locksteppers claim that the GOP has blocked everything Obummer has done? Maybe that reduced the rate of spending?

I agree 100%.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:32 pm

Pablo Sandoval

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:57 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
KC Scott wrote:the one who was Governor
he has already refuted all that he accomplished as governor. and the GOP House wouldn't let him do any of the things he would do as governor.

the man you are voting for doesn't exist anymore. try again.

No wonder you're so fucked up in the head. You go by what politicians say rather than what they do.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:14 pm

mvscal wrote: No wonder you're so fucked up in the head. You go by what politicians say rather than what they do.

by that logic Romney will establish Romneycare and fire 30% of the workforce and use taxpayers to bail him out if his unknown plot doesn't work all the while herding a pile of money that he just gives to his cult.

well played, tantrum boy. well played indeed.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 9:32 pm

Diego in Seattle wrote:
Felix wrote:none of the above
2rd.

2 confirmed homosexuals aren't going to vote. I like it.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:01 pm

KC Scott wrote:I've broken it down to basics

The basics being either you want to rely on Govt. spending and programs or you want to rely on the private sector to grow jobs

It's really that simple

Nice false dicot.
Eat a dick tard.

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:21 pm

KC Scott wrote:whoa there little fella.....

All you need to do is click the BO link at the top of this page to read his plan to spend, spend, spend our way to economic prosperity

And all you have to do is pull your head out of your ass to see how stupid that sounds you lerch looking bugeyed fuck.

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:23 pm

trev wrote:Who is going to add up our electoral votes? That would be interesting.

The President of the Senate in Joint Session of Congress, dummy.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:25 pm

KC Scott wrote:Bace here's BO's platform: http://www.barackobama.com/issues/

Innovation: President Obama is investing in education, research and technology to grow the economy for the long term. / Govt. Spemding

Nation-building at home: The President’s plan uses half the money we’re no longer spending on war to put Americans back to work rebuilding road, bridges, runways and schools here at home / Govt. Spending

energy: investing in cleaner sources, we can become a global leader in clean energy / Govt. spending

Education: Lead the world in college graduates by 2020. President Obama is making historic investments in education to create opportunity for all Americans / Govt. Spending

See it really is that simple - his entire platform right from his website

Investing in education is bad? Haven't public schools always been run with tax dollars? Guaranteed student loans for college students? That's a bad idea?

Rebuilding roads, bridges, and schools is bad? Haven't we always spent tax dollars for that too? Don't privately owned contractors get paid for that?

We aren't going to escape, nor should we, government spending on any of the items you mentioned, Scott. Are you trying to say that Romney will not spend government money for these things and that's a good reason to vote for him?

Moving Sale · Post by **Moving Sale** » Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:28 pm

KC Scott wrote:Elfish...why U so Mad ?

Did the price of booster seats go up at Costco again?

Hey lerch why you so stupid? To busy sticking cock in your ass to study false dicot in high school?

For President of The United States of America