2013 Rose Bowl

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

2013 Rose Bowl

Post by Mikey »

I know I'm jumping the gun here, but consider this very plausible scenario:

Oregon beats Cal, Stanford and OSU, and wins the CCG and goes to the NCG
13-0, 9-0 (not counting CCG in conf record)

USC beats ASU and UCLA, and loses to ND, winning the Pac12 south, and then loses to Oregon in the CCG
8-5, 6-3

Stanford beats OSU and UCLA before losing to Oregon. Oregon wins Pac12 north
9-3, 7-2

OR

OSU beats Stanford, Cal and Nicholls St. ( :lol: ) but loses to Oregon.
10-2, 7-2


Does an 8-5 USC with three conference losses play in the Rose Bowl because they officially came in second in the conference over a 9-3 or 10-2 team with only two conference losses?

Is the Rose Bowl free to choose OSU or Stanford (or even a non Pac12 team) if they lose Oregon to the NCG?
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl

Post by Mikey »

I guess one requirement that I overlooked is that whichever team it is must be ranked in the top 14 to qualify.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31616
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl

Post by Mikey »

Sudden Sam wrote:
Mikey wrote:I guess one requirement that I overlooked is that whichever team it is must be ranked in the top 14 to qualify.
When the playoffs begin in 2014, we'll have even weirder bowl matchups.
Cal could play in the NCG and the Rose Bowl?
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl

Post by Dinsdale »

Maybe I haven't looked very hard, since it wasn't an issue for my team last year, but I've yet to see an explaination of who gets the Grandaddy if the conference champ goes to the NCG.

I would think it would have to be the second best conference record, with some stupid tiebreaker system for the 7-2ers (or whatever).

Could end up being OS... that would be a hoot. They haven't been to one since Thomas Jefferson was president.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Cornhusker
2018/2019, 2023/2024 and 2024/2025 Pick ‘em Champion
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 4:13 am
Location: The Prairie

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl

Post by Cornhusker »

I believe the BCS bowls have the option to pick an at large (highest ranked) if one of the conference champions plays in the NCG.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl

Post by Goober McTuber »

I don't think they have to take the highest ranked.

Sincerely,

The Sugar Bowl
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: 2013 Rose Bowl

Post by Dinsdale »

Cornhusker wrote:I believe the BCS bowls have the option to pick an at large (highest ranked) if one of the conference champions plays in the NCG.

Actually, they have to, if the at-large is above a certain ranking.

Like TCU.

But the Rose doesn't/can't if it's happened in the last 4 years... like with TCU. So it will be PAC12 vs B1G champ.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Post Reply