Props to the voters of Colorado

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:10 am

This is a huge victory for personal freedom. And the first brick crumbles...

Dr_Phibes · Post by **Dr_Phibes** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:24 am

I have no idea what this means, but cheer up Mike

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:33 am

Oh, I'm plenty cheered up. Just trying to decide if this is worth moving home for...

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ ... ation-vote

Trampis · Post by **Trampis** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:36 am

Looks like half the board is going to move to Wa. State so they can smoke herb and get married to their partners.

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:43 am

KC Scott wrote:There are BIG rumors 0maMAO didn't go after the pot shops there because of CO swing state status - will be interesting to see if that changes now the election is over.

For a look at what I mean - check out what the Feds have been doing in Cali: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/01/us/hu ... d=all&_r=0

Call me naive, but I have a feeling Obama will call off the dogs now that he's been reelected and doesn't have to worry about being labeled "soft on drugs." I could be proven wrong, but I have high hopes, no pun intended.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:47 pm

Well, Mike, this should dramatically help football recruiting for the Buffs.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:44 pm

Here in the home of decriminalization, the potsmokingest state there is, the legalization measure failed. Something more reasonable would have passed easily, but anyone who wanted to grow for personal use (the measure allowed anyone to grow) had to pay outrageous fees and taxes and there was going to be a government hand out at every turn.

Still didn't fall too much short, though.

Supporters will regroup, and win the next one, I'm fairly sure. Oregonians don't just want to be able to buy it at the store -- they want to be free to grow it... and don't want to plunk down $1000 just to apply for a license (which then costs a few hunny more).

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:06 pm

There should be complete freedom to grow your own. I do think there should be some sort of licensing for those that want to sell it. Pretty much what we already have with those other drugs, tobacco and alcohol.

I guess it figures that your libtards couldn't pass on the opportunity to make it a giant tax collection opportunity.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:11 pm

smackaholic wrote:There should be complete freedom to grow your own. I do think there should be some sort of licensing for those that want to sell it. Pretty much what we already have with those other drugs, tobacco and alcohol.

I guess it figures that your libtards couldn't pass on the opportunity to make it a giant tax collection opportunity.

Completely agree.

I can't get behind anything that isn't unregulated home grown for home use. If you want to sell it for a profit, then it should be subject to the same rules as any other agricultural endeavor.

Trampis · Post by **Trampis** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:24 pm

Yea, any other ag product

. Trade missions, subsidies...~~food~~ pot stamps, ~~corn~~ hemp mazes at holloween. It really should mellow things out at the farmers market on Saturdays.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:27 pm

Vancouver is loving this shit. Right across the river from 2 million people.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:38 pm

Trampis wrote:Yea, any other ag product . Trade missions, subsidies...~~food~~ pot stamps, ~~corn~~ hemp mazes at holloween. It really should mellow things out at the farmers market on Saturdays.

If it's GMO it should be labeled though.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:09 pm

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:This is a huge victory for personal freedom. And the first brick crumbles...

let's not go sucking each others dicks just yet.

the ballot measure was officially titled the "Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol Act".

nobody really knows exactly what that even means just yet. there will be licensing, permits, taxes, expanded DUI checkpoints... etc

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:52 pm

Cuda wrote:let's not go sucking each others dicks just yet.

Whatever your timetable is for this, just count me out. TIA.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:49 pm

You're in a hurry, as usualm

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:54 pm

Cuda wrote:You're in a hurry, as usualm

Is that supposed to make any sort of sense whatsoever? Of course not. It's a Cooter post.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:27 pm

KC Scott wrote:The main problem being since there's a Fed law against it, none of these stores can get bank accounts / loans etc. for risk of the banks getting busted by the feds for drug money laundering

This. My industry won't touch it. We actually got a call from a Colorado pot store about six weeks ago desperate for service.

We laughed.

Mace · Post by **Mace** » Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:49 pm

mcet · Post by **mcet** » Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:42 am

This is good for the economy and the safety of our guys on border control.

-ma

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:50 am

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:Call me naive, but I have a feeling Obama will call off the dogs now that he's been reelected and doesn't have to worry about being labeled "soft on drugs."

You're naive. He's going to jump on them with both feet. The Feds are seriously fucking with dispensaries in California and have been for months.

He was never worried about being labeled soft on drugs. Nobody cares about pot.

T1B

Props to the voters of Colorado

Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado

Re: Props to the voters of Colorado