Page 1 of 1
Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:02 pm
by smackaholic
Been listening to all the talking heads babble on about how the storm cockblocked Willards momentum and gave Barry an opportunity to look presidential.
I call bullshit.
Are there really people that fukking stupid out there, who were sitting in their living room, scratching their head, wondering who the fukk they'd vote for, then look up at the TV and see Barry and Chubby making out and think, wow, look at that bipartisanship! i hate partisans and barry just showed he's not one!
I mean, yes, I do understand they are that stupid, but, i doubt this had an effect on their decision.
I will say that the storm may have helped with the benghazi debacle non-coverage, but, that was pretty much safe, anyway.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:06 pm
by Screw_Michigan
I'm gonna spread this thread on my lawn and watch it grow green.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:10 pm
by smackaholic
As for Chris Mathews racking Sandy, I would like to go ahead and put dibs on him for the '13 DP with cause of death being homicide.
Many people in the NY area had their lives ruined by this storm. Some of these folks have mob ties. These kinda folks aren't the kind that like it much when someone else says they are glad they got fukked.
Hopefully one of these folks will off that piece of shit and toss him into landfill somewhere in jersey.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:11 pm
by smackaholic
You don't have a fukking lawn, dipshit.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:33 pm
by R-Jack
That's an utter shit excuse. It's no shock that GOP dong slurpers are more concerned with making excuses than wondering about what is wrong with their party and why they can't win in Ohio or carry their own canidates states.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:48 pm
by Left Seater
R-Jack wrote:That's an utter shit excuse. It's no shock that GOP dong slurpers are more concerned with making excuses than wondering about what is wrong with their party and why they can't win in Ohio or carry their own canidates states.
Good line, too bad it fails the fact check. This notion that Sandy somehow cost Mitt momentum or even the election was first brought to light by the Liberal Media. The New York Times’ John Cassidy, Reuters’ Andrew Reeves and popular polling expert Nate Silver all either wholly or partially attributed Obama’s pre-election surge in the polls to Hurricane Sandy.
But the biggest tard of all is Chris Matthews of MSNBC saying he was glad we had this storm. Really, you are glad 100 or more died and some are still without power?
Sadly unsurprising though.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:52 pm
by Mikey
These people have to spend hours every day talking in front of a camera and have to come up with something to talk about. Not much to talk about after the election besides what might have swung the election. I guess they're not smart enough to talk about how the President and Congress might try to agree on something and get it done. Or maybe the audience just isn't interested.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:05 pm
by R-Jack
Left Seater wrote:R-Jack wrote:That's an utter shit excuse. It's no shock that GOP dong slurpers are more concerned with making excuses than wondering about what is wrong with their party and why they can't win in Ohio or carry their own canidates states.
Good line, too bad it fails the fact check.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-0 ... blow-.html
You were saying.......
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:12 pm
by Left Seater
Go take it up with MSNBC and the NYTimes which were saying this before Tuesday.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:14 pm
by Mace
Sounds like "I blame Sandy" can replace "I blame Bush" around here. Whatever works for ya.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:16 pm
by Goober McTuber
God wanted Obama to win.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:25 pm
by Smackie Chan
Goober McTuber wrote:God wanted Obama to win.
This chick who lived on the street I grew up on & now lives in St. Louis became a whacked-out pastor, and posts incessantly on fb. She posted one of the most fucked-up spin jobs I've ever seen...
Kooky Pastor Chick wrote:I "believe" God told me Romney would win. I stand by my statement at the time....it was before our US Government made sure our soldiers who fight for our freedom didn't get their ballots in time,(that alone would have changed the vote) and voter fraud claims. Letting people vote twice etc. Actually Romney did win because he was standing for morality and with God thats always a win......
:doh:
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:29 pm
by Mace
You grew up down the street from Michelle Bachmann? I didn't know.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 5:34 pm
by Smackie Chan
Roach wrote:god is mad
He seems to be that way a lot lately. He should chill with a fatty, maybe in CO or WA.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:27 pm
by Smackie Chan
Same nutcase pastor posted this hand-wringing gem, too:
Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed. Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected. Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.Welcome to 3rd world country fraud.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:39 pm
by Mace
Iowa does have a voter ID law but it doesn't require a photo, even though the vast majority present an Iowa drivers license which is a photo ID. The wingnuts are having a field day showing their stupidity.
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:43 pm
by Smackie Chan
Mace wrote:Iowa does have a voter ID law but it doesn't require a photo
Well there you go. Your state was obviously complicit in Obama's fraudulent victory. Shame on you!
Re: Did Sandy really swing the election?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:07 pm
by Mace
Smackie Chan wrote:Mace wrote:Iowa does have a voter ID law but it doesn't require a photo
Well there you go. Your state was obviously complicit in Obama's fraudulent victory. Shame on you!
Could be, but all 15 of my votes were counted.