T1B

Great game so far, true.
The SEC ball sucking is strong with these two morons. I may just turn off the sound.

RACK the fuck out of that game.

LSU's offense was horrible. Good thing their D got them that early turnover or they don't have a chance. 8 three and outs?

Les Miles strikes again. We need two yards for a first down to ice the game so we throw the ball on consecutive downs. No time off the clock. Clemson doesn't have to burn a single time out. No first down. And we have a running back with 140 yards y the third quarter but he doesn't touch the ball. One yard of offense in the 4th quarter. But some people will still defend Miles and his stupidity.

Python wrote:Les Miles strikes again. We need two yards for a first down to ice the game so we throw the ball on consecutive downs. No time off the clock. Clemson doesn't have to burn a single time out. No first down. And we have a running back with 140 yards y the third quarter but he doesn't touch the ball. One yard of offense in the 4th quarter. But some people will still defend Miles and his stupidity.

Even for Less Is More, that was a law-dropping display of ineptitude.

Hard to advocate firing a guy who has had the level of success Lester has, but that was amazing. Imaging if that was the MNC game?

I think they win despite Miles, really. LSU is a mecca for local/regional talent, has been for a long time, and a different coach who understands the basics of game management would still pull that same high level of talent - the brand sells itself. This year had an odd void of offensive talent, by LSU standards.

I'd be unhappy if I was LSUfan. That was a clownshow for the ages.

Sorry to break it to you Spray, but LSU simply isn't that good. That's all there is to it.

You said "Clemson is that good". I have no clue about next year, mostly because I don't give a frick about Clemson. But this year they aren't that good.

Python wrote:Sorry to break it to you Spray, but LSU simply isn't that good. That's all there is to it.

So is it Miles' stupidity, or is it that your team "simply isn't that good?"
Or are you crying like a spoiled thee year old?

We have a bad team and a bad coach. It's not that difficult of a concept for normal people.

Papa Willie wrote:they'll definitely be a team to watch out for...

Say it every year, and it'll probably happen eventually.

Python wrote:We have a bad team and a bad coach. It's not that difficult of a concept for normal people.

Fair enough I guess. So it took a shitty Clemson team to make it a close game.

Dinsdale wrote:
I think they win despite Miles, really. LSU is a mecca for local/regional talent, has been for a long time, and a different coach who understands the basics of game management would still pull that same high level of talent - the brand sells itself. This year had an odd void of offensive talent, by LSU standards.

LSU wasn't exactly lighting it up before Saban, so not like winning at LSU, especially at the clip Les has, is the default.

M Club wrote:LSU wasn't exactly lighting it up before Saban, so not like winning at LSU, especially at the clip Les has, is the default.

Yeah but in the LSU before Saban-era the Big 11 was still winning big bowl games and playing for nationals titles once in a while. Times have changed.

Papa Willie wrote:

Mikey wrote:Pac12, Pac12, Pac12!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You really ought to try to come up with something new. This has nothing to do with the Pac12.

Screw_Michigan wrote:

M Club wrote:LSU wasn't exactly lighting it up before Saban, so not like winning at LSU, especially at the clip Les has, is the default.

Yeah but in the LSU before Saban-era the Big 11 was still winning big bowl games and playing for nationals titles once in a while. Times have changed.

Another outstanding syllogism. You must be affiliated with GW somehow.