T1B

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 6103.story

Wait...only one person seriously injured?

The shooter had a shotgun with no high capacity magazine?
He was disarmed by a teacher who wasn't packing?

Good thing he didn't bring a hammer. He might have killed everybody.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local ... 48511.html

He needs to up his game.

Oikos?

Mikey wrote:http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 6103.story

Wait...only one person seriously injured?

The shooter had a shotgun with no high capacity magazine?
He was disarmed by a teacher who wasn't packing?

Good thing he didn't bring a hammer. He might have killed everybody.

Are you implying that had he had a high capacity mag AR-15, everybody in the class dies?

What a fukking maroon.

It ended differently because he was in a class full of larger people capable of fighting back including the teacher that disarmed him. If he was in a room full of 6 year olds with a 26 year old honey for a teacher, you likely have a similar result to Sandy Hook.

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 6103.story

Wait...only one person seriously injured?

The shooter had a shotgun with no high capacity magazine?
He was disarmed by a teacher who wasn't packing?

Good thing he didn't bring a hammer. He might have killed everybody.

Are you implying that had he had a high capacity mag AR-15, everybody in the class dies?

What a fukking maroon.

It ended differently because he was in a class full of larger people capable of fighting back including the teacher that disarmed him. If he was in a room full of 6 year olds with a 26 year old honey for a teacher, you likely have a similar result to Sandy Hook.

OK you're right. Big people don't get killed by .223 rounds. Just six year olds.

RACK you. You bested me again.

Mikey wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 6103.story

Wait...only one person seriously injured?

The shooter had a shotgun with no high capacity magazine?
He was disarmed by a teacher who wasn't packing?

Good thing he didn't bring a hammer. He might have killed everybody.

Are you implying that had he had a high capacity mag AR-15, everybody in the class dies?

What a fukking maroon.

It ended differently because he was in a class full of larger people capable of fighting back including the teacher that disarmed him. If he was in a room full of 6 year olds with a 26 year old honey for a teacher, you likely have a similar result to Sandy Hook.

OK you're right. Big people don't get killed by .223 rounds. Just six year olds.

RACK you. You bested me again.

You're a dumbass.

In close quarters, like say a classroom, a 12 gauge is a MUCH more effective weapon than a .223. This douchestain obviously was using some small bird shot, or had really bad aim.

With the proper load, a 12 gauge (which the Grabbers think is "OK for hunting") is MUCH better for taking out humans inside 25 yards... not even a comparison.


And since this incident apparently involves a single target, as revenge for bullying, comparing it to Sandy Hook is apples and oranges.

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 6103.story

Wait...only one person seriously injured?

The shooter had a shotgun with no high capacity magazine?
He was disarmed by a teacher who wasn't packing?

Good thing he didn't bring a hammer. He might have killed everybody.

Are you implying that had he had a high capacity mag AR-15, everybody in the class dies?

What a fukking maroon.

It ended differently because he was in a class full of larger people capable of fighting back including the teacher that disarmed him. If he was in a room full of 6 year olds with a 26 year old honey for a teacher, you likely have a similar result to Sandy Hook.

Not if each and every one of those 6 year olds were packing their concealed gorilla that day.

Unfortunately Ct does not allow concealed gorilla carrying.

Mikey wrote:

smackaholic wrote:

Mikey wrote:http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 6103.story

Wait...only one person seriously injured?

The shooter had a shotgun with no high capacity magazine?
He was disarmed by a teacher who wasn't packing?

Good thing he didn't bring a hammer. He might have killed everybody.

Are you implying that had he had a high capacity mag AR-15, everybody in the class dies?

What a fukking maroon.

It ended differently because he was in a class full of larger people capable of fighting back including the teacher that disarmed him. If he was in a room full of 6 year olds with a 26 year old honey for a teacher, you likely have a similar result to Sandy Hook.

OK you're right. Big people don't get killed by .223 rounds. Just six year olds.

RACK you. You bested me again.

Why yes, I did.

Your comparison of these two events and implication that they ended differently due to weaponry choice is Let's turd level stupid.

Dinsdale wrote:
You're a dumbass.

In close quarters, like say a classroom, a 12 gauge is a MUCH more effective weapon than a .223. This douchestain obviously was using some small bird shot, or had really bad aim.

With the proper load, a 12 gauge (which the Grabbers think is "OK for hunting") is MUCH better for taking out humans inside 25 yards... not even a comparison.


And since this incident apparently involves a single target, as revenge for bullying, comparing it to Sandy Hook is apples and oranges.

Gee, you and smackaholic are teaching me so much today.

He taught me that a .223 won't kill big people, only little people.

Apparently though, at .223 WILL kill big people, but only from 25 yards or more. But two shotgun shells will still kill a lot more than 30 or 40 .223 rounds.

The things you learn on a message board.

If I were in a gun fight in a small space like a class room I would take the shotgun almost every time.

I wouldn't take the shot gun if I had the choice of a Taurus Judge though.

Left Seater wrote:If I were in a gun fight in a small space like a class room I would take the shotgun almost every time.

I wouldn't take the shot gun if I had the choice of a Taurus Judge though.

But were you given the option of taking the gorilla then it's conversation closed, right? A Rice man like yourself surely knows what's what.

Mikey wrote:

Apparently though, at .223 WILL kill big people, but only from 25 yards or more. But two shotgun shells will still kill a lot more than 30 or 40 .223 rounds.

What does a quantity of 2 shotgun shells have to do with it unless you be packing a coach gun..?

We have been down this one before, but I will reset for you.

Normal run of the mill 12 gauge shot gun. 6 in the magazine one in the chamber, 7 total rounds. 00 buckshot. (9) .32 caliber rounds in each shell. 9X7 =63 rounds. Larger caliber than in the .223...way larger.

I know you don't give a flying fuck about tactical things, but in most defensive and or offensive scenarios, the normal 12 gauge shotgun so loaded is the recommended weapon from about 10 yards out to 60 yards.

So one full magazine and one chambered round in a 12 gauge with 00 buckshot, has more than twice the rounds downrange than (1) 30 round .223 clip.

Give me the bitch homes...!

Mikey wrote:Gee, you and smackaholic are teaching me so much today.

He taught me that a .223 won't kill big people, only little people.

Apparently though, at .223 WILL kill big people, but only from 25 yards or more. But two shotgun shells will still kill a lot more than 30 or 40 .223 rounds.

The things you learn on a message board.

Either round is potentially lethal to big or small people.

The biggest difference here is big people have the ability to fight back.

You seem to be stuck on the idea that that fukking nut job would have not been able to butcher 20 little kids with anything other than an "assault rifle".

smackaholic wrote:Unfortunately Ct does not allow concealed gorilla carrying.

What about partially concealing gorillas? I'm a pro at that.


~Pikkkle~