Page 1 of 1

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 2:18 am
by Van
Washington is going nuts over the Evertune?

:lol:

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:00 am
by Mikey
I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:16 am
by Diego in Seattle
Mikey wrote:I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
I wouldn't fret about that.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:19 am
by Van
I like the tone of this one. Maybe Mikey can pull some strings and keep it going.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 3:26 am
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
For some reason, this thread resonates with me.

I saw the title...and couldn't let is slide.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:12 am
by Van
Maple isn't just syrup, you know. Remember that, the next time you're in a barre. It's a helluva pick-up line.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:15 am
by Mikey
Martyred wrote:For some reason, this thread resonates with me.

I saw the title...and couldn't let is slide.
Don't stick your neck out, it might get cutaway.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:15 am
by Smackie Chan
Diego in Seattle wrote:
Mikey wrote:I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
I wouldn't fret about that.
Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:37 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Smackie Chan wrote:
Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.

Then why hammer on about things?

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 1:50 pm
by Smackie Chan
Martyred wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:
Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.

Then why hammer on about things?
Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:09 pm
by Mikey
Smackie Chan wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
Mikey wrote:I'll give you my capo when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
I wouldn't fret about that.
Agree. It's nothing to get too amped up about.
If we're going to succeed here we'll need to Marshall our resources.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:55 pm
by smackaholic
Mikey wrote:If we're going to succeed here we'll need to Marshall our resources.
g0ddamn you, fat hippy man, I was gonna use that one. :x

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 4:57 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
Fellas, hold up. We need one clear speaker here. All I'm hearing is distortion. We need a strong pitch to strike a solid chord.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:05 pm
by smackaholic
wah, wah.

That is all I am hearing from you cry babies. Grow up, for crissakes.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:10 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
So, an E-flat, a G-flat, and a B-flat walk into a bar.
And the bartender says,
"I'm sorry, we don't serve minors and I don't want to get in treble."

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:17 pm
by Shlomart Ben Yisrael
Smackie Chan wrote:
Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.
Truthfully, I've never been fond of your username, but I'd never wish any...


...harm on nics.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:27 pm
by Van
Martyred wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.
Truthfully, I've never been fond of your username, but I'd never wish any...


...harm on nics.
:rock:

Wasn't sure where you were going with that one, so I'm glad to see we managed to avoid another silly Fender bender.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:37 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
So just how long can we string this thread out?

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 5:51 pm
by Mikey
If this discussion goes on much longer I may have to unplug my computer's power chord.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:35 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
Mikey wrote:If this discussion goes on much longer I may have to unplug my computer's power chord.
No you won't Mikey, that's a barre-faced lie. We just need someone to modulate this thread, to keep a nice interval between posts.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 6:53 pm
by Van
Sudden Sam wrote:
Martyred wrote:
Smackie Chan wrote:Look, I don't wanna sustain any disagreements we may have. I'd rather bridge our differences.
Truthfully, I've never been fond of your username, but I'd never wish any...


...harm on nics.
Masterful.

I'd clap tons, but I'm reading and turning the page.
With lines like that, I will place myself at your beck and call.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:03 pm
by Van
Dude, get off my (eric) Johnson. Swear to god, you people behave like a bunch of gibbons.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:11 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
Sudden Sam wrote:I'd clap tons, but I'm reading and turning the page.
What Sam, are a segar of cheap attention?

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:17 pm
by Jay in Phoenix
Papa Willie wrote:Trots this motherfucker. :lol:
Done.
Image

Interesting that this band has a song called "Wolfman". Hmm...

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:32 pm
by smackaholic
Van wrote:Dude, get off my (eric) Johnson. Swear to god, you people behave like a bunch of gibbons.
you go van!!!!!

tell 'em like it is.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 7:42 pm
by Van
shutyomouth's deep-fried trots are like an adagio scirocco of flatulent feedback.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 9:11 pm
by BSmack
Whoever started this thread needs to die in an auto-erotic Steve Vai concert accident.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2013 10:17 pm
by smackaholic
BSmack wrote:Whoever started this thread needs to die in an auto-erotic Steve Vai concert accident.
The folks over at department of redundancy department aren't gonna like that one.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 12:57 am
by Go Coogs'
All I know is 'Spray doesn't know diddly about what Washington wants.

Buttsy, it's probably best you flea from this thread, smoke a dime bag and follow it up with a nice thick cut of Angus. Trust me, you'll feel like a young squire or prince.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 1:29 am
by Van
Go Coogs' wrote:Buttsy, it's probably best you flea from this thread
Image

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:50 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Van wrote:
Go Coogs' wrote:Buttsy, it's probably best you flea from this thread
Image
Thanks for the pictorial reference. Not like people not named smackaholic couldn't figure out what he was doing with that series.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 2:56 am
by Van
It was just the picture, is all. I saw that one recently and his expression cracked me up. This seemed like a good place for it.

Re: Washington doesn't want to ban guns.

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:58 am
by smackaholic
^^^^^^ the second page.