Page 1 of 1

They're baaaaack

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:44 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Nothing like a good tragedy to drag these attention-whoring degenerates out of the woodwork. So how many of you are going to volunteer your services on the picket line? Wags? Spray? Derron?
In a tweeting binge following the explosions at the finish line of the Boston Marathon on Monday, the Westboro Baptist Church celebrated the carnage and announced its intention to picket the funerals of victims.

The tiny Topeka, Kan., fundamentalist group urged the U.S. government to "reinstate" the death penalty for homosexuality and warned "violence will fully consume u [sic]" if that doesn't happen. Most of the church's tweets said same-sex marriage caused the bombing, but others mentioned abortion and supposed mistreatment of the church.

A news release dated April 15 announced the church's intention to picket the funerals of the three bombing victims. Massachusetts, the release says, "invited this special wrath from God Almighty when it was the FIRST STATE to pass same-sex marriage" in 2004. "Westboro Baptist Church to picket funerals of those dead by Boston Bombs! GOD SENT THE BOMBS IN FURY OVER FAG MARRIAGE! #PraiseGod," said a tweet from the church's @WBCFliers account.

"THANK GOD FOR THE BOSTON MARATHON BOMBS!! Westboro Baptist Church to picket funerals of those killed. #PraiseGod," said another tweet from the @WBCSays account.

The church did not respond to an email from U.S. News seeking details about the picket plans. The church's phone line was consistently busy Tuesday. There are no Massachusetts events currently listed on the church's online protest schedule.

A similar plan by the church to picket the funeral of the elementary school principal who was murdered in the December Newtown, Conn., school shooting was unsuccessful, The Huffington Post reported, because volunteers blocked access to the funeral until church members changed their plans.

One tweet from @WBCSays Tuesday featured a photo of a man comforting a female victim with blood splattered along a Boston sidewalk. "LOOK at this image - sent directly fm God! He promised to cast ur bloody carcasses on ur flag idol! #WBCIsSoThankful," said the church.

Church pastor Fred Phelps - the aging patriarch who is related to most congregation members - said in a comment released on Twitter, "God is busy punishing those who've mistreated His people for preaching." Another tweet said, "Memo to Boston police: Is it time to re-think that mistreat and abuse WBC policy you implemented many years ago?!?!"

The church also said that the death of 8-year-old Martin Richard was God's punishment. "His blood is on YOUR hands. Died for #SSM," tweeted church member Margie Phelps.

The church is infamous for picketing the funerals of fallen soldiers with vulgar anti-gay signs and posters. They often picket for maximum exposure and are frequently greeted by irate locals.

A significant stream of income for the church comes from lawsuits, many arguing that state and local laws – or enforcement of the laws – violate members' First Amendment rights.

In reaction to Westboro's spiteful piety, a petition on the White House's "We the People" website urges authorities to "ban" the church members from entering Boston.

http://www.usnews.com/news/newsgram/art ... hurch-says

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 10:54 pm
by Mace
I see that the idiots in the world are not limited to T1B. That's comforting.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:29 pm
by smackaholic
About time for some good ole fashioned church fire bombing. Fukk those a-holes. If I lived in that area, I would scour the obituaries for westboro member obituaries so I could show up at the cemetery for the party.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:32 pm
by Diego in Seattle
If you really want to hurt them, stop writing about them. They're just attention whores.

And smackaholic....they've already had one small "mysterious" fire.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:37 pm
by smackaholic
Diego in Seattle wrote:If you really want to hurt them, stop writing about them. They're just attention whores.

And smackaholic....they've already had one small "mysterious" fire.
they need a bigger one, preferrably when the entire congregation is in the church.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2013 11:51 pm
by War Wagon
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:So how many of you are going to volunteer your services on the picket line? Wags?
I'm perplexed at how to respond to this call-out. Unless you can link me to a post where I ever propped the WBC and their reprehensible protests, think the best thing to do is just acknowledge the stupid and go watch the Royals game instead.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 1:22 am
by mvscal
What if they're right, though? Maybe God really does hate fags?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:03 am
by smackaholic
mvscal wrote:What if they're right, though? Maybe God really does hate fags?
That was the old testament bitter g0d. The drown the fukk outta everybody and start again g0d. The "I was just fukking wit you, dog" (to Abraham) g0d.

He was a fukking asshole.

Then he became a dad, well, you know, a real dad, not just dad of everything dad. And he turned into a liberal pussy.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 2:50 pm
by Mikey
smackaholic wrote:
That was the old testament bitter g0d. The drown the fukk outta everybody and start again g0d. The "I was just fukking wit you, dog" (to Abraham) g0d.

He was a fukking asshole.

Then he became a dad, well, you know, a real dad, not just dad of everything dad. And he turned into a liberal pussy.
Image
Watch what you say my corpulent son, I still hear all and see all,
and I'm still known for my temper.
Been to Atlantic City lately?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:26 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
mvscal wrote:What if they're right, though? Maybe God really does hate fags?
God is a fag. Tell me you knew?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:33 pm
by mvscal
I'm serious here. The evidence is pretty solid that God does indeed hate fags. Look what happened to Sodom and that other place. Did God not command mankind to be fruitful and multiply? That task is rendered impossible when you spray your jizz in another dude's colon or all over his stubbly, five o'clock shadowed piehole, wouldn't you say?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:41 pm
by smackaholic
Mikey wrote:
smackaholic wrote:
That was the old testament bitter g0d. The drown the fukk outta everybody and start again g0d. The "I was just fukking wit you, dog" (to Abraham) g0d.

He was a fukking asshole.

Then he became a dad, well, you know, a real dad, not just dad of everything dad. And he turned into a liberal pussy.
Image
Watch what you say my corpulent son, I still hear all and see all,
and I'm still known for my temper.
Been to Atlantic City lately?
You trying to take credit for AC?

AC is undoubtedly lucifers's work

Fukk off, you gravytraining has been.

Even Buddha thinks your a joke.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:49 am
by Diego in Seattle
mvscal wrote:I'm serious here. The evidence is pretty solid that God does indeed hate fags. Look what happened to Sodom and that other place. Did God not command mankind to be fruitful and multiply? That task is rendered impossible when you spray your jizz in another dude's colon or all over his stubbly, five o'clock shadowed piehole, wouldn't you say?
You aren't really so stupid as to go to the "marriage is for the purpose of child creation" card, are you?


Oh wait...yes you are.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:14 am
by Toddowen
Diego in Seattle wrote:
"marriage is for the purpose of child creation"

A union that results in the natural creation of a child should be given some specific name, shouldn't it?

No matter what name you arrive upon, the queers without stars on thars are going to feel left out and demand their rights. And in that way the definition of marriage isn't specific.

Much better to shed more light on the type of marriage. Traditional marriage, gay marriage, fag marriage, backdoor marriage, double-donged dildo marriage, freaky flying carpet marriage, sapphic slumming spit swapping marriage...

These are a little more descriptive and so much the better.

I believe in German there is something like two dozen words for just pig alone. Why must the English language be limited to one unambiguous all collective word to describe marriage? Or would you rather some of the other examples I listed be used for further clarification?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 1:25 am
by Diego in Seattle
Toddowen wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
"marriage is for the purpose of child creation"

A union that results in the natural creation of a child should be given some specific name, shouldn't it?
You can call it whatever you want, swine.

It's what the state calls it that mat matters.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:40 am
by Van
Toddowen wrote:A union that results in the natural creation of a child should be given some specific name, shouldn't it?
And so there is: 'fucking.'

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:35 pm
by Toddowen
Van wrote:
Toddowen wrote:A union that results in the natural creation of a child should be given some specific name, shouldn't it?
And so there is: 'fucking.'
The gays engage in that too via a different route.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 8:13 pm
by R-Jack
Toddowen wrote:
Van wrote:
Toddowen wrote:A union that results in the natural creation of a child should be given some specific name, shouldn't it?
And so there is: 'fucking.'
The gays engage in that too via a different route.
Your butthole?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:31 pm
by mvscal
Diego in Seattle wrote:
mvscal wrote:I'm serious here. The evidence is pretty solid that God does indeed hate fags. Look what happened to Sodom and that other place. Did God not command mankind to be fruitful and multiply? That task is rendered impossible when you spray your jizz in another dude's colon or all over his stubbly, five o'clock shadowed piehole, wouldn't you say?
You aren't really so stupid as to go to the "marriage is for the purpose of child creation" card, are you?


Oh wait...yes you are.
Who the fuck said anything about marriage? It appears that you've been sucking on kiddy cock so hard you're suffering from oxygen deprivation. Come up for air sometime.

No, the discussion here is whether or not the WBC is right in their assertion that God hates fags. I have to say that they have a good deal of evidence to support their position.

I think the most compelling bit of proof is that, well, he made them fags then he nuked their cities and, more recently, gave them AIDS. Look around. At best, fags are the objects of pity. Is anybody on earth crossing his fingers and hoping that his son will take dicks in his ass and chug cocks when he grows up? Don't think so.

I'm just not seeing a lot of love from the Big Guy when it comes to 'mos. I have to concur. God does hate fags.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:07 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Stop playing devil's advocate, you disingenuous asshole. Your posting history very clearly suggests you have no belief in God, which would make it pretty fucking difficult to arrive at the conclusion that an entity you don't believe in "hates fags."

And even if God is real, and does hate fags, he wouldn't express that by orchestrating an amateur attack at the Boston Marathon (a decidedly ungay event). He'd go after a San Fran gay pride parade or Toddowen's basement on a Friday night.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:17 pm
by mvscal
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:And even if God is real, and does hate fags, he wouldn't express that by orchestrating an amateur attack at the Boston Marathon (a decidedly ungay event).
Why not? He has already punished fags by making them fags and compelling them to shove various foreign objects up their asses. No, what God is punishing is our society's acceptance of their sick and perverted behavior.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:36 pm
by Van
But what does the Boston Marathon have to do with any of that? One could just as easily surmise from that bombing that God hates people and their families who eat Cliff Bars.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:49 pm
by mvscal
Van wrote:But what does the Boston Marathon have to do with any of that?
Think of it as God's way of dropping a turd in our punchbowl of spineless, mewling capitulation to the most vulgar and despicable deviants society can muster.
One could just as easily surmise from that bombing that God hates people and their families who eat Cliff Bars.
He just might. You have to stay on your toes these days.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:57 pm
by R-Jack
God can't hate fags. His own son was a sperm belching faggot.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:59 pm
by smackaholic
all the more reason to hate them.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:02 pm
by mvscal
R-Jack wrote:God can't hate fags. His own son was a sperm belching faggot.
...and look what happened to him.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:04 pm
by mvscal
KC Scott wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Van wrote:But what does the Boston Marathon have to do with any of that?
Think of it as God's way of dropping a turd in our punchbowl of spineless, mewling capitulation to the most vulgar and despicable deviants society can muster.
One could just as easily surmise from that bombing that God hates people and their families who eat Cliff Bars.
He just might. You have to stay on your toes these days.
I thought MVS was an Athiest

Isn't that like Ray Charles describing the Sistine Chapel?
Getting nervous?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:06 pm
by R-Jack
mvscal wrote:
R-Jack wrote:God can't hate fags. His own son was a sperm belching faggot.
...and look what happened to him.
If he was a more visible figure in the boy's life, maybe his son wouldn't have ended up squatting on unwashed arab cock. Instead he let some dipshit sheep fucker and the cunt he knocked up raise him while skipping out on child support like he's fucking God or something. The dude was a douchebag negligent father.

Don't know why he has to smote Toddowen for his own bad parenting.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:18 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Van wrote:God hates people and their families who eat Cliff Bars.
Dude have you ever had a Macadamia chocolate Clif bar? Holy shit, they're so good they almost taste like the sweetest vagina you've ever tasted.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:23 pm
by Felix
you'd think those idiots would have learned their lesson by now......
Anonymous has given those morons fair warning, but apparently you just can't stop stupid......good luck, anon is definitely not a group to be trifled with

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:31 pm
by Diego in Seattle
mvscal wrote:
Diego in Seattle wrote:
mvscal wrote:I'm serious here. The evidence is pretty solid that God does indeed hate fags. Look what happened to Sodom and that other place. Did God not command mankind to be fruitful and multiply? That task is rendered impossible when you spray your jizz in another dude's colon or all over his stubbly, five o'clock shadowed piehole, wouldn't you say?
You aren't really so stupid as to go to the "marriage is for the purpose of child creation" card, are you?


Oh wait...yes you are.
Who the fuck said anything about marriage? It appears that you've been sucking on kiddy cock so hard you're suffering from oxygen deprivation. Come up for air sometime.

No, the discussion here is whether or not the WBC is right in their assertion that God hates fags. I have to say that they have a good deal of evidence to support their position.

I think the most compelling bit of proof is that, well, he made them fags then he nuked their cities and, more recently, gave them AIDS. Look around. At best, fags are the objects of pity. Is anybody on earth crossing his fingers and hoping that his son will take dicks in his ass and chug cocks when he grows up? Don't think so.

I'm just not seeing a lot of love from the Big Guy when it comes to 'mos. I have to concur. God does hate fags.
Using the same scriptures, it could be that God hates football players (touching the skin of a dead pig). I think God was publishing Beantown for the Patriots touching the skin of a dead pig while working on the Sabbath.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:47 pm
by Van
Screw_Michigan wrote:
Van wrote:God hates people and their families who eat Cliff Bars.
Dude have you ever had a Macadamia chocolate Clif bar? Holy shit, they're so good they almost taste like the sweetest vagina you've ever tasted.
Had one for lunch today.

Meaning a macadamia chocolate Cliff Bar, not the sweetest vagina I've ever tasted, unfortunately.

Anyway, I'm still trying to see mvscal's connection between the Boston Marathon and God's decision to punish fags and/or a society that tolerates faggotry. How does the Boston Marathon serve as a logical focal point for that issue? If anything, wouldn't He target a New York Liberty-Phoenix Mercury tilt or an Air France show for a bit of the ol' kristallnacht treatment?

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:20 am
by mvscal
Diego in Seattle wrote:Using the same scriptures, it could be that God hates football players (touching the skin of a dead pig). I think God was publishing Beantown for the Patriots touching the skin of a dead pig while working on the Sabbath.
A. Footballs are made of leather.

B. The Sabbath is Saturday.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:38 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Only on T1B can a thread about God and faggotry...........stay on course about God and faggotry.

Re: They're baaaaack

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:35 pm
by Mace
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Only on T1B can a thread about God and faggotry...........stay on course about God and faggotry.
Probably because this place is full of bible thumpers and fags.