Yeah, that's always worked out well for them. Severe SEC bias and such.Sudden Sam wrote:
It's yours for the taking, Oregon.
Alabama Is Not a #1 Team
Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc
Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team
-
Goober McTuber
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team
If M2 and Schmick is where you've set your posting bar, it's no wonder you suck at this.Papa Willie wrote:It's funny how we get tagged with the SECBSH thing - when all you have to do is to look at M2 & Schitt. That's conference BSH'ering at it's very best.Python wrote:Yeah, that's always worked out well for them. Severe SEC bias and such.Sudden Sam wrote:
It's yours for the taking, Oregon.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team
so who's number 1?
Baylor?
cause they're breaking records , bub.
Bama is a legit 1 right now. and rightfully so..and should stay there till they get beat.
just my .03 pennies tho.
Baylor?
cause they're breaking records , bub.
Bama is a legit 1 right now. and rightfully so..and should stay there till they get beat.
just my .03 pennies tho.
-
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan
- Baby Bitch
- Posts: 2882
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:29 am
- Location: Tempe, AZ
Re: Alabama Is Not a #1 Team
I didn't get to watch the game, but I assumed that Saban was just doing the honorable thing by playing conservative football and not running up the score all Oregon-style against his homeboy McElwain. Did the Tide really look that bad?
"Keys, woman!"