Stanford - Washington

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Nice start.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Play action seems to be working for Washington.
But the holding penalty really bailed Stanford out.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

Yet another team who let Uncle Phil dress them.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

BTW -- I don't need to mention who I'm rooting for, right?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

No Trufant? No problem.

Fuck Those People.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

I know you love the Fuskies.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Really going to enjoy watching Sanders over the next couple of years.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

My Fusky love is well documented.

I just wish we could have had them in Week 1, so we could open the new stadium like we closed the old one -- with an asskicking.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

Mikey wrote:Really going to enjoy watching Sanders over the next couple of years.

Agreed.

Was hoping he'd get in as a true frosh, but Taylor was pretty good.

Then again, if he was that super-rad, he would be there already. Fun to watch, regardless.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

I think they're bringing him a long slowly and putting some weight on.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

If next week UDub busts out helmets as nasty as the last 2 weeks, The Dinsinator is going to hop in his truck, drive to Seattle, and slap a bitch.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Not expecting to put up 55 tonight but I would love to see a major beat down put on Sankey, Price and S-j.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

Mighty smashmouth game for a PAC12 tilt.

And if one is going to play smashmouth, Skov is a good guy to bring to the party.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

Mikey wrote:I would love to see a major beat down put on Sankey

He's already taken a couple of huge hits.

BTW, the flag on UDub on the block on the punt return was complete BS... couldn't have happened to a better team.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Dinsdale wrote:
Mikey wrote:I would love to see a major beat down put on Sankey

He's already taken a couple of huge hits.

BTW, the flag on UDub on the block on the punt return was complete BS... couldn't have happened to a better team.
Agreed it was BS. Defense is looking pretty inept right now and the offense hasn't done shit. My confidence is suffering a little.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Threaded the fucking needle on that one.
User avatar
The Seer
Just the Facts
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Maricopa County

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by The Seer »

I like Udub's chances in the 2nd half.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Haven't seen any pressure on the QB. At all.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

FUCK!!!
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

Nice game by Washington. Stanford coaches almost fucked themselves out of a win with their idiotic "try not to lose" play calling. A good win against a worthy team but not looking like a top 5 team right now
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Dinsdale »

While neither one can be taken lightly, I'm now not the slightest bit worried about either of these teams.

Stanford eked one out, at home against UDub. Watch what happens in Seattle next Saturday.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
The Seer
Just the Facts
Posts: 6306
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:28 pm
Location: Maricopa County

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by The Seer »

Watching a replay of that disputed "non-catch" - sure looks like a tough one to overrule - Stanny seems to get more of those than they give...Curious the typically inept officials hastily called timeout to review... :shock:
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31572
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Stanford - Washington

Post by Mikey »

The Seer wrote:Watching a replay of that disputed "non-catch" - sure looks like a tough one to overrule - Stanny seems to get more of those than they give...Curious the typically inept officials hastily called timeout to review... :shock:
There was an earlier one that went the other way. Receiver came down on his forearm, elbow in bounds, hand and ball out. They called it a catch to keep a drive going. That also could have gone either way. The point is, those calls even out over time. If you think one team seems to get more or less than their fair share it's prolly because you want to see it that way.
Post Reply