T1B

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 8:11 am**

National Champions??

:|

Just wow.
Wow.

Wow.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 2:25 pm**

Just another day in Bizzaroworld.....

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 3:52 pm**

So hyperventilating, run-on ranting, overuse of niqqer, reverse racism and bad rap were the qualifying factors for the win? "Sha-clack-clack! I be havin' dreams of chocolate covered watermelons, fried with grilled chicken with picaninny signs..."

Awesome.

I almost feel like apologizing to mvscal...almost.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:09 pm**

Gee, can't imagine why someone might hold the products of this so-called culture in utter contempt.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:26 pm**

Jay in Phoenix wrote:So hyperventilating, run-on ranting, overuse of niqqer, reverse racism and bad rap were the qualifying factors for the win? "Sha-clack-clack! I be havin' dreams of chocolate covered watermelons, fried with grilled chicken with picaninny signs..."

Awesome.

I almost feel like apologizing to mvscal...almost.

If you are implying that you are waffling on whether or not you should become a racist like Ofailurecal, what does any of that have to do with skin color yo?
http://www.theoneboard.com/board/viewto ... =2&t=44355

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:27 pm**

mvscal wrote:Gee, can't imagine why someone might hold the products of this so-called culture in utter contempt.

You are a racsit, not just a cultural bigot. Why are you such a pussy about owning it?

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:29 pm**

Moving Sale wrote:what does any of that have to do with skin color yo?

It's cultural. I've said as much dozens of times.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:44 pm**

I know what you said. I'm talking about what you are. You are a racist. Why are you such a pussy about owning it?*

* And yes it is a rhetorical question. We all know that it is mostly pussies who become racists because they project there failings (or in your case Ofailings

) off on other people.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:45 pm**

Papa Willie wrote: "yeah - I'm a racist, so the fuck what?"

Show me where Ofailurecal has ever owned it you cholesterol soak cumstain.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:50 pm**

Moving Sale wrote:I know what you said. I'm talking about what you are. You are a racist. Why are you such a pussy about owning it?*

I'd own it if it we're true. It simply isn't technically accurate. It's a small quibble that doesn't make a whole lot of difference.

Why does it bother you so much?

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 4:54 pm**

Moving Sale wrote:If you are implying that you are waffling on whether or not you should become a racist like Ofailurecal, what does any of that have to do with skin color yo?

Thus my use and emphasis of the word..."almost." My silly little stories spoke (silently) for themselves.

A racist I will never be. There is something to be said for the cultural idiocy on display in that so-called "debate" and the photo mvscal used. All cultures display aspects of stupidity, it's inherent in being human.

What was shown in that debate was jaw dropping in its cultural stereotypes and why crap like this fuels racism, or cultural bias at least.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 5:52 pm**

mvscal wrote:It's a small quibble that doesn't make a whole lot of difference.

A) it's a lie that you are not a racist.
B) if it doesn't make a difference then you are almost ready to admit you are a racist.
C) why not own it?

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 5:56 pm**

88 wrote: It is just a weird competitive event.

No it's not. It's a bunch of stupid mvscals. Have you not been following Ofailurecal's posts?

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 7:37 pm**

What is your obsession with trying to cast me as a liberal?

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 9:43 pm**

88 wrote:It rewards participants who can string together value statements or propositions in some semblance of coherency, which have been sourced. In this type of debate format, volume wins over presentation and substance in many regards.

And apparently bonus points are awarded when "nigga" is inserted into your hyperventilating.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 10:19 pm**

88 wrote: A weird competition, as I said before.

It could be that somehow society could persevere without that type "competition"...

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 10:23 pm**

88 wrote:According to a news article, rather than address the resolution straight on, teams of African-Americans (including the eventual national champions) attacked its premise. The more pressing issue, they argued, is how the U.S. government is at war with poor black communities. (that was a c&p).

How in the world could they argue that the US gvt is at war with poor blacks? They should have been laffed off stage for even suggesting as such.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 10:33 pm**

The Seer wrote:It could be that somehow society could persevere without that type "competition"...

Not just persevere, but be far, far better off.

How this "competition", which is supposed to be a debate (discussion, usually with intelligent, well informed thought), devolved into this ebonic, slang mumbled hyperventilating, fist pounding mess, is mind boggling. Those two "girls" and the crap wrapper never actually said anything. How they won is mystifying.

What a farce.

Posted: **Mon May 05, 2014 10:44 pm**

I don't know the first thing about different debating styles, but, I would think that any style would require putting together coherent thoughts.

There was not a single coherent thought in that mess, as best as I could tell.

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 12:04 am**

LS wrote:How in the world could they argue that the US gvt is at war with poor blacks? They should have been laffed off stage for even suggesting as such.

"At war with" might be a bit strong, but I think a case might be able to be made that many gov policies for dealing with "poor black communities" have only perpetuated the problems they are having.

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 12:19 am**

Who stole poptart's password?

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 1:45 am**

poptart wrote:
LS wrote:How in the world could they argue that the US gvt is at war with poor blacks? They should have been laffed off stage for even suggesting as such.
"At war with" might be a bit strong, but I think a case might be able to be made that many gov policies for dealing with "poor black communities" have only perpetuated the problems they are having.

So these two ladies are in lock step with conservatives?

Interesting way of looking at it, doubt that is their take though.

Also, what MS said.

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 6:27 am**

schmick wrote:Exactly, I worked my fucking ass off last year so I could pay $68,000 in federal income tax that was handed to worthless fucking oxygen thieves (white, black, brown, yellow) who sat on their fucking asses watching Judge Judy and dumb ass debates about chocolate covered watermelons.
For 68,000 dollars how many blacks can get a seat on a boat back to africa where they dont have to worry about my tax dollars being at war with them? Fuck their race baiting, all the white people you see here are here because their families didnt like where they were at so they left. If they are so unhappy here, leave.

Fuck liberals, they're all pieces of shit who want to sit on their ass and let someone else pay their way. End welfare, food stamps, public education, tax payer subsidized housing and let the Taker trash of society die off, no matter what color their skin is, before they drag all of us down with them.

You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.

LS says it's not really possible to argue that the U.S. gov is at war with poor balck communities, you say, "Exactly," and rant on.
But then you end your rant by listing off a string of policies the gov needs to... DO AWAY WITH.

That was my point.
What the gov has been doing... for decades, has not been working.
If you continue on with policies which are NOT WORKING and are perpetuating harm, you are either a moron or you are malicious.
So yes, one might make an argument that the gov has been malicious, or "at war" with poor black communities.

But it's not only blacks, as 88 accurately noted.

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 7:08 am**

schmick wrote:The "exactly" was to left seaters remark about them suggesting that the government was at war with the poor black community. If anything the government is at war with the people who work hard to earn an income and then have that money stolen from them by the government and handed to people who dont get off their ass to earn it for themselves.

The policies have been bad for people like you -- and ineffective at really helping the communities of those who are sponging.

Plus many of the policies have been constitutionally questionable (at least), imo.

The welfare state needs a dramatic pruning.

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 2:16 pm**

So if these "college" students wanted to be accurate shouldn't they be "debating" how so called black leaders are at war with poor black communities?

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 2:17 pm**

schmick wrote: And change the fucking tax system, the more dependents you have, the more tax you pay. There is no way in hell I, as a single person, should have to pay over 90,000 dollars in state and federal income tax in one year. I could not possibly use that much in resources

Sure you could. How big is your house? How many miles do you drive in what kind of rides? What kind of biz are you in? How much do you travel and how? Do you use the courts? Do you own any investment properties? Do you own stocks? Do you own an airplane? A boat? Ever been sick? Married? Kids?

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 9:22 pm**

schmick wrote:3,600 sq feet
about 10k miles a year, 20% or so on the toll road.
Medical Administration
very little now by car or plane
No
Yes
Yes
No
Not anymore
Yes
No
1, privately schooled

I see. And how many black cocks would you say you suck during the course of an average year? Excellent. Well, I will have your swarthy tax bill prepared for you as racist as vapidly possible.

--Melting Midget

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 10:12 pm**

schmick wrote:3,600 sq feet
about 10k miles a year, 20% or so on the toll road.
Medical Administration
very little now by car or plane
No
Yes
Yes
No
Not anymore
Yes
No
1, privately schooled

Judging from these answers you could very well use 90k in government services. I can break it down for you if you if you like.

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 11:15 pm**

And you may be right. Let's try this. How much do YOU think you use in gov services/yr?

Posted: **Tue May 06, 2014 11:44 pm**

Your share and 1/2 of your kids share of the defense budget in 2013 was around 3.5k$ last year. Should we cut it?

Posted: **Wed May 07, 2014 5:20 am**

Moving Small wrote:I know what you said. I'm talking about what you are. You are a racist. Why are you such a pussy about owning it?*

So in your limited mind, if mv admits he's a racist... it will then get you to stop posting once and for all? If so, then who would mv have to torment?

Why is it then that you don't have the intellectual capacity to respond to him without using terms you allegedly deplore? I've read your earlier responses as to why you use those, but those are such a pussy bunch of lies. So don't re-hash what you are using as a broken crutch. Surely you can debate him without using such terms right? Maybe, there is a reason you are using him as an excuse to use those terms in most of your posts.

Check yourself there shortcake.

Posted: **Wed May 07, 2014 3:43 pm**

What, you finally quit shitting your pants thus qualified for library computer-lab privileges at the rehab clinic?

We missed you. Not.

T1B

wt...F?

wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?

Re: wt...F?