T1B

Why is her baby naked?

Nice 8,000, bro.

S_M wrote:Why is her baby naked?

Why?

Obviously because it is a liberal rag pushing a feminist female-empowerment agenda.


Clothed female in position of power/neeked male, helpless and dependent.

What man doesn't like the idea of sucking an attractive woman's tit?

So brainwashed millions of males gaze upon the photo and fantasize (if even for a brief moment) that they are that neeked little male, sucking and dependent on... mommy.
Thinking, "Wow, it feels kind of good to be naked, submissive, and dependent on a powerful woman."

Mission accomplished.







Deal with it!




:wink:

Jesus H. Christ. Breastfeeding is a feminist female-empowerment agenda? Good God, you are twisted.

Goober McTuber wrote:Jesus H. Christ. Breastfeeding is a feminist female-empowerment agenda? Good God, you are twisted.

No doubt, when is it something that has been done since the beginning of time (you know poptart "all 4000 years ago") considered some kind of agenda by feminazi's?

Y2K wrote:No doubt, when is it something that has been done since the beginning of time

Oh sure.

I don't know about y'all, but I often go into a diner and see a woman breastfeeding a fully neeked male baby.

All the time.


Dumbass.

poptart wrote:neeked male

You have x-ray vision?

..the pose in which she’s wearing a Roberto Cavalli dress and Prada shoes while nursing her naked infant son.

https://www.yahoo.com/health/olivia-wil ... 24387.html

Smackie Chan wrote:

poptart wrote:neeked male

You have x-ray vision?

"Wait...There's such a thing as naked baby x-ray vision?"

Sincerely,

poptart wrote:..the pose in which she’s wearing a Roberto Cavalli dress and Prada shoes while nursing her naked infant son.

https://www.yahoo.com/health/olivia-wil ... 24387.html

Ok then; scanned the article 88 linked & didn't see a reference to the kid's gender. Didn't care enough to dig deeper.

poptart wrote:

Y2K wrote:No doubt, when is it something that has been done since the beginning of time

Oh sure.

I don't know about y'all, but I often go into a diner and see a woman breastfeeding a fully neeked male baby.

All the time.


Dumbass.

From the article you linked:

In the Glamour photo caption, Wilde notes that she is happy with the message her breastfeeding image sends — but also admits she doesn’t always look so picture perfect. “It felt like we were capturing that multifaceted woman we’ve been discussing — that we know we can be. You can be someone who is at once maternal and professional and sexy and self-possessed,” she said. “[But] I mean, I certainly don’t really look like that when I’m [typically] breastfeeding. And there’s usually a diaper involved.”

But please continue on with your faux outrage. Dumb. Ass.

Methinks some folks are just too dumb to understand poptart's agenda. There was no winky emoticn in the post I responded to.

“[But] I mean, I certainly don’t really look like that when I’m [typically] breastfeeding. And there’s usually a diaper involved.”

- O. Wilde

Goober wrote:But please continue on with your faux outrage. Dumb. Ass.

They chose to publish a picture which is NEVER the reality of breastfeeding.
Dressed like a movie star, breastfeeding a fully nude male baby in a diner.

LOL


And I'm the nutter for pointing out a thought agenda?


All of the major magazines seek to stir a feeling inside of us when they chose to run with a picture, or cover picture.

It's very obvious what buttons this picture was designed to push.

But then again, I'm generally well ahead of the curve in knowing what the hell is going on.


Hi, Sam. :wink:

Or maybe they just want to encourage breastfeeding. And yes, you are unquestionably a certified nutter.

Me thinks that Pastortart has been hanging around TFT a little too much lately.