T1B

1. Oregon - Y knot?
2. Alabama - SEC bowing
3. UCLA - yeah, that's right
4. Oklahoma - play somebody
5. Auburn - could be best in sec
6. Baylor - Look vulnerable
7. Notre Dame - might as well give em a sniff
8. Florida St - with loser at qb, could be prob
9. Ole Miss - see what happens next week
10. Texas A&M - should've lost to arky

1 Oregon
2 Oklahoma
3 Alabama
4 Auburn
5 Baylor
6 Texas A&M
7 Florida State
8 UCLA
9 Miss St
10 Notre Dame

1. Oregon
2. Oklahoma
3. Baylor
4. Auburn
5. Alabama
6. Florida State
7. Notre Dame
8. UCLA
9. Texas A&M
10. Mississippi State

The Seer wrote:1. Oregon - Y knot?
2. Alabama - SEC bowing
3. UCLA - yeah, that's right
4. Oklahoma - play somebody
5. Auburn - could be best in sec
6. Baylor - Look vulnerable
7. Notre Dame - might as well give em a sniff
8. Florida St - with loser at qb, could be prob
9. Ole Miss - see what happens next week
10. Texas A&M - should've lost to arky

pac 10 writer Jon WIlner has OU ranked #1 based on their schedule vs. others in the top 5 not in fact playing somebody, as you say. fwiw. not saying i'd do it or even agree but worth noting. now, he also had texas tech in his preseason top 25. go figure. that said, UO over Sparty is still the marquee W of the OOC slate.

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespo ... -new-no-1/

Papa Willie wrote:1. Oregon
2. Oklahoma
3. Alabama
4. Auburn
5. FSU
6. Texas A&M
7. Notre Dame
8. Michigan State
9. Mississippi State
10. UCLA

Having a team with a 20 point loss 4 games into the season in a Top 10 ranking is dubious.

The Seer wrote:Having a team with a 20 point loss 4 games into the season in a Top 10 ranking is dubious.

Not any less dubious than teams with a 4-0 record who haven't played anybody.

Everybody would have that same loss if they played that game.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

The Seer wrote:Having a team with a 20 point loss 4 games into the season in a Top 10 ranking is dubious.

Everybody would have that same loss if they played that game.

I'm sure duckfan appreciates your admiration but that is quite a leap.

Papa Willie wrote: C. I watched enough of that game to know that the Ducks had a little late game luck. If that game would have been @ Sparty, Sparty would have won. I actually started to put them even higher...

Luck ?


You obviously don't watch many PAC 12 games.


Michigan State was "smoked" by 3 TD's.


I think it was 28-3 in the 2nd half... and Michigan State wasn't close to being in the game after a few minutes into the 2nd half.


If you just ate 3 buckets of chicken... instead of 12... you probably wouldn't pass out due to asphyxiation and could actually watch a PAC 12 game to its completion.


But, hey... you just got fired from your gig at Kansas .

matteric wrote: I think it was 28-3 in the 2nd half... and Michigan State wasn't close to being in the game after a few minutes into the 2nd half.

First part is true. Second part, as usual, you are completely full of shit. Unless you consider Oregon scoring to take the lead with 1:34 left in the 3rd only "a few minutes into the 2nd half."

ummmm.....

Florida St - with loser at qb, could be prob

In 3 games, Winston has thrown for 330 yards per game. What do you want? 500 yards? 600?

You may hate the guy but, he gets the job done, and VERY well.

Look, compared to last year, FSU looks bad. I agree. But even if they win every game by a point, they still win it. The defense MUST get tougher, but the ND game will define the whole season.