T1B

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:24 am**

It's been about 30 years since sports has seen the last "Dynasty"...

Of course, that would be us again... The San Francisco 49ers.

The thing that makes us special is that we don't take shit so seriously like the Midwestern folk or the Southern folk.

We would NEVER think of deleting a post/thread of a Championship celebration (sup, KC Scott tard) ?

Here's a clip of how we roll... when we began a new "Dynasty"

Oh yeah, I'm pretty sure our fan base would kick the living shit out of any fan base in any sport !

It's just... "How we roll" ...

We have teeth... work out for fun

... and have a sense of humor

3 World Championships in 5 years...

Lights...

There is simply no other fan base like "Baghdad by the Bay"

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:52 am**

Straight up...

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:00 am**

It's who we are...

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:16 am**

Oh yeah...

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:45 am**

matteric wrote:The San Francisco 49ers.

You ARE the most stupid of asses.

Goodbye.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:54 am**

Sudden Sam wrote:It's a damn good run, but dynasties don't go 76-86.

huh ?

What would you know about "Dynasty's" ?

The only professional sports team you have is a bunch of teenage kids that play for a corrupt institution in alabama.

Too funny.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 11:56 am**

Carson wrote:
matteric wrote:The San Francisco 49ers.
You ARE the most stupid of asses.

Goodbye.

It's fun making fun of people from Alabama... just for this reason.

You can't make this shit up ...

Too funny

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:07 pm**

First off, congrats to the gnats.

Dynasty? A bit of a strong term, just yet.

The pats won three of four a decade ago? Not a dynasty.

The fakers won 6 as did the bulls, during that stretch, well after the niners run, which, I will give you, may fit the dynasty definition.

Last baseball dynasty was the 50s yanks.

Win another in the next few years and we'll talk. Till then, do T1B, the interwebs and the world a favor and jump off one of your pretty bridges.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:10 pm**

smackaholic wrote:First off, congrats to the gnats.

Dynasty? A bit of a strong term, just yet.

The pats won three of four a decade ago? Not a dynasty.

The fakers won 6 as did the bulls, during that stretch, well after the niners run, which, I will give you, may fit the dynasty definition.

Last baseball dynasty was the 50s yanks.

Win another in the next few years and we'll talk. Till then, do T1B, the interwebs and the world a favor and jump off one of your pretty bridges.

How on earth do you tie your shoes in the morning ?

You're that stupid.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:15 pm**

loafers and velcro.

So, what did I get wrong. Ohh, yeah, left out the late 90s yanks, 3 of 4 if I recall. That almost became a dynasty. Almost.

Any way, I have given a number of examples of "dynasty" by your definition, between your 2 dynasties, the first of which, sort of was.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:22 pm**

smackaholic wrote:loafers and velcro

It's good to know that the back of your head has a strap.

Stay out of threads that you don't know shit about...

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:24 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote:3 titles in 5 years is very impressive, but it's nowhere close to a dynasty.

Dynastic teams don't go in the tank betwixt their championships. They maintain a standard of excellence even when not claiming the championship.

Stay down... stupid.

You're boring me to death.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:26 pm**

tool wrote:It's been about 30 years since sports has seen the last "Dynasty"...

Chicago Bulls?

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 12:33 pm**

poptart wrote:
tool wrote:It's been about 30 years since sports has seen the last "Dynasty"...
Chicago Bulls?

Good gawd... I'm surrounded by retards.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 1:02 pm**

poptah, you buffon. the bulls never went 3 for 5. well, actually they went 3 for 3, two times, but still, how is someone as dumb as you tolerated by those highly intelligent overachieving zipperheads. you should have been stuffed into a barrel and buried years ago like an oversized jar of kimchi.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:03 pm**

I think we're over-romanticizing the term "dynasty"

Even as a non-Gnats fan, I can agree with toolio to an extent. Three titles in five years is about as good as you're going to get in the dynasty discussion in this day and age.

That said, there have been several dynasties since the 49ers with the criteria that he's laying out. This could be a good back and forth thread and if he wants to actually discuss his topic and those teams, he's more than welcome to do so. If he's just going to be his typical toolio, then I can pretty much TROTS this bad boy now.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 3:33 pm**

Sudden Sam wrote:I don't think he's capable of that. I seriously doubt there are many windchime salespersons who either played baseball or follow it close enough to carry on a serious discussion about such matters.

Every word true. He cannot discuss actual baseball, he just keeps piling on stolen photos and false noise.

Remember when he did the cut and paste thread where he claimed to be "Oski"?

Tools is a fraud, a SF bandwagon wannabe, who suckles from the penile shaped teat of The City. A thread like this might be worth continuing, IF he had shown at least a modicum of grace in the Giants winning. Instead, he goes the YAFJ route, the worst of the worst. His continuing use of the phrase "Baghdad" shows his ignorance. As that particular city has fallen into a dark and disgraceful period, he's actually insulting the city that puts up with his presence. Then again, it is the filthy transient psychopath capitol of the country, so he does have that going for him.

Major ups to the Giants for winning the Series. Great team, lousy fucking fan base.

Choke on your chime Tools.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 4:53 pm**

KC Scott wrote:I don't know if he has the capability to evolve into someone who can contribute to a board, instead of just shitting on it.
His most recent incarnation doesn't appear so...

If he doesn't learn it soon he's going to be joining Kaley and Stanley Pickle

Easy Scott, he may start another thread calling you a bitch.

After all, that's how he rolls.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:23 pm**

KC Scott wrote:I actually don't want him to leave or to ban him

He came into Radio one night and was cool, I encouraged him to reregister :doh:

I think he can be a ~~good~~ ~~decent~~ acceptable contributor if he can just control this strange urge to IMG-up every thread he's in

I found the same thing to be true, when about two months ago I was in Radio at the same time he was and the guy was straight up okay.

That's what makes his trolling and pic spamming so curious. But hell, he's been C & P'ing posts for a long while now, so it's hard to imagine any original thought coming off his keyboard. Whatev's.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 5:25 pm**

KC Scott wrote:...if he can just control this strange urge to IMG-up every thread he's in

Good luck with that. He is what he is.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:41 pm**

Posting pictures of shit doesn't necessarily make one a shit poster. There is a difference. Milton, on the other hand, is a paste-eating window licker. He is simply too stupid to not suck.

The only decision to make is whether or not his occasional, random moment of lucidity is worth putting up with all his shit spamming fucktardery.

Posted: **Thu Oct 30, 2014 9:05 pm**

The only entity here deserving of dynasty status is a toilet plunger.

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:25 am**

KC Scott wrote:
mvscal wrote:
Good luck with that. He is what he is.
We actually have precedent for someone who was a shit poster turning into a solid contributor -

shutyomouth take a bow

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:54 am**

KC Scott wrote:We actually have precedent for someone who was a shit poster turning into a solid contributor.

In a sense, the two are the same.

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:39 pm**

mvscal wrote:Posting pictures of shit doesn't necessarily make one a shit poster.

By definition, I'm pretty sure it does.

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 4:41 pm**

Mikey wrote:
mvscal wrote:Posting pictures of shit doesn't necessarily make one a shit poster.
By definition, I'm pretty sure it does.

I laffed. Well said Mikey.

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 5:56 pm**

Papa Willie wrote:I am a shit poster when I post pictures of shit.

There. Admitting is the first step in recovery...

No shit.

:wink:

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:16 pm**

My offer to make the first contribution to the "have toolie whacked" fund still stands.

Goobs' OL is a Siciliana. Pretty sure she must have a brother or cousin in the business.

Just make sure BSmack isn't the treasurer.

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:22 pm**

So, see if I have the original premise correct...

Winning 6 championships in 8 years = not a dynasty

Winning 3 championships in 4 years = not a dynasty

Winning 3 championships in 3 years = not a dynasty

But wait, there's more...

Winning 3 championships in 5 years = not a dynasty (with 2 other championships bookending the era)

BUT...

Winning 3 championships in 5 years = dynasty?

Alrighty then.

Posted: **Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:38 pm**

Toolio has something of a shit take dynasty going. Pretty close to a 100% success rate at this point.

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:03 am**

Mikey wrote:Toolio has something of a shit take dynasty going. Pretty close to a 100% success rate at this point.

Fukk yeah, he is the 27 yankees of shit.

The sultan of shit.

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:19 am**

I love cock...

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:06 pm**

The Maharaja of Muck
The Baron of Bunk

Sent from my ADR6350 using Tapatalk 2

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:33 pm**

The Duke of Puke

The Pharoah of Faggotry

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:59 pm**

matteric wrote:

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 7:23 pm**

The Asscrack of Gravytraining Hacks.

The Sphincter of the Sphinx.

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:32 pm**

Commissar Of Cummy Socks

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:32 pm**

The shah of stock photos.

Posted: **Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:47 pm**

14 straight years of being the Board Bitch actually is a dynasty.

Posted: **Sun Nov 02, 2014 2:07 am**

Fuck sports.

Imperial China had shorter dynasties than that.

T1B

The Start of a Dynasty...

The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...

Re: The Start of a Dynasty...