T1B

Same sex-couples will have the legal right to be institutionalized, just like everybody else.

Sam, I guess you've just become institutionalized.

I know what you're probably thinking right now: Kyle, you're cherry-picking little bits and pieces of the Bible to make a ridiculous argument.

The thing here is that everyone is cherry-picking.

No Kyle, you just don't know what you are talking about.

The Bible very clearly tells us that God established marriage, and what that marriage is.


Genesis 2:22-24
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.


That's it.

poptart wrote:Genesis 2:22-24
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

That's it.

Huge
Crock
of
Shit

poptart wrote:

I know what you're probably thinking right now: Kyle, you're cherry-picking little bits and pieces of the Bible to make a ridiculous argument.

The thing here is that everyone is cherry-picking.

No Kyle, you just don't know what you are talking about.

The Bible very clearly tells us that God established marriage, and what that marriage is.


Genesis 2:22-24
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.


That's it.

Archie Bunker wrote:In the Bible, it says God made man in His own image. And he made women after, from a rib -- a cheaper cut.

Jsc810 wrote:Pop, just wondering, but have you ever considered the remote possibility that maybe, just maybe, you might be wrong?

Have you?

It's rather unfair to ask someone to do something you wouldn't do yourself

Goober McTuber wrote:

poptart wrote:

I know what you're probably thinking right now: Kyle, you're cherry-picking little bits and pieces of the Bible to make a ridiculous argument.

The thing here is that everyone is cherry-picking.

No Kyle, you just don't know what you are talking about.

The Bible very clearly tells us that God established marriage, and what that marriage is.


Genesis 2:22-24
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.


That's it.

Archie Bunker wrote:In the Bible, it says God made man in His own image. And he made women after, from a rib -- a cheaper cut.

Yeah but prime rib is not bad. Especially with some good hot horseradish.

So, it's pretty safe to assume that Pop is OK with the raping and kidnapping portions of the bible.

And stoning sassy children to death.

nostra wrote:It's rather unfair to ask someone to do something you wouldn't do yourself

I'm guessing you don't get a whole lot of blowjobs.

Goober McTuber wrote:

nostra wrote:It's rather unfair to ask someone to do something you wouldn't do yourself

I'm guessing you don't get a whole lot of blowjobs.

You're as dumb as you ever were.

And you're just as humorless as ever. Go fuck yourself.

Goober McTuber wrote:And you're just as humorless as ever. Go fuck yourself.

EAD, tube

Don't feed the old troll nostra, he's ancient, cranky, humorless and queer as a three dollar bill.

Hell, he posts naked pics of himself for dudes on anonymous message boards, so...go figure.

Jay in Phoenix wrote:Don't feed the old troll nostra, he's ancient, cranky, humorless and queer as a three dollar bill.

Hell, he posts naked pics of himself for dudes on anonymous message boards, so...go figure.

I hope he knows that when I told him to EAD I didn't mean my D

Wow. Are both of you clowns from KC?

Goober McTuber wrote:Wow. Are both of you clowns from KC?

nostra wrote: You're as dumb as you ever were.

Another brilliant retort from nostradumbass.

What's the matter Gobbles? Feeling that drain starting to spin? Leathery skin itching your panties?

Go back to the beach and pound sand asshole.

Goober McTuber wrote:Another brilliant retort from nostradumbass.

You never were very good at this Goober.

You want us to round up some of the retards from HØNKSVILLE so you can relive your glory days and kick some retard ass at competition coloring, power napping, and booger eating?

Papa Willie wrote:

Goober McTuber wrote:And you're just as humorless as ever. Go fuck yourself.

Actually - he makes me laugh probably more than just about any other poster on the internet.

Makes sense. You laugh at anything involving feces. He's a shit poster.

As Gobbles proves once again what a complete waste of carbon and oxygen he is.

Pull the plug, the patient is brain dead.

Are you still feeding the troll that you told nostra not to feed? You not too smart.

No shit stain, I was talking to nostra.

You really do suck at this thing, he was right.

Goober McTuber wrote:You not too smart.

Always funny

So, to recap:

Goober McTuber wrote:

nostra wrote:It's rather unfair to ask someone to do something you wouldn't do yourself

I'm guessing you don't get a whole lot of blowjobs.

Goobs hits one out of the park.

Meltdowns from angry old ED sufferers ensue.


I think that pretty well sums it up.

Dinsdale wrote:So, to recap:

Goober McTuber wrote:

nostra wrote:It's rather unfair to ask someone to do something you wouldn't do yourself

I'm guessing you don't get a whole lot of blowjobs.

Goobs hits one out of the park.

Meltdowns from angry old ED sufferers ensue.


I think that pretty well sums it up.

it was a good one, no doubt, but much like years gone by I still fail to see what you bring to the thread

nostra wrote: it was a good one, no doubt, but much like years gone by I still fail to see what you bring to the thread

For starters, there's the whole proper punctuation thingy.

And if ever there was a time for me to invoke a KC-Exemption, this would be it.

Once again the thumpers are cherry-picking what parts of their book of fairy tales they wish to get upset about:

They protest & bomb abortion clinics, yet support Walmart ("Masters, give your bondservants what is just and fair, knowing that you also have a Master in heaven" (Colossians 4:1)). Although you will throw a hissy fit if an underpaid worker fails to say "Merry Christmas" to you.

While enjoying your ability to marry the ability to marry the person of your choice, you refuse to allow others the same ( Luke 6:31English Standard Version (ESV)
31 And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.). Seen the thumpers protest at courthouses or attorney offices about divorce being as unbiblical as homosexual marriage?

Pops...you might want to take that 2X4 out of your eye...

But divorce just isn't nearly as...icky.

jsc wrote:I urge you to really look at the words and actions of Jesus and try to determine what he would do. Would he be condemning and damning homosexuals to hell? Or would he be welcoming and loving?

You read my post to start this thread, right?
http://theoneboard.com/board/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=45733

Most times I think you ignore what's posted and just -----> FILIBUSTER instead.

Dinsdale wrote:So, it's pretty safe to assume that Pop is OK with the raping and kidnapping portions of the bible.

And stoning sassy children to death.

God's children haven't been living under the law for 2,000 yrs now, Dins.

Romans 10:4
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth

BSmack wrote:

poptart wrote:Genesis 2:22-24
And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

That's it.

Huge
Crock
of
Shit

You can explain your disagreement if you want to.

Diego in Seattle wrote:Once again the thumpers are cherry-picking what parts of their book of fairy tales they wish to get upset about:

They protest & bomb abortion clinics, yet support Walmart ("Masters, give your bondservants what is just and fair, knowing that you also have a Master in heaven" (Colossians 4:1)). Although you will throw a hissy fit if an underpaid worker fails to say "Merry Christmas" to you.

While enjoying your ability to marry the ability to marry the person of your choice, you refuse to allow others the same ( Luke 6:31English Standard Version (ESV)
31 And as you wish that others would do to you, do so to them.). Seen the thumpers protest at courthouses or attorney offices about divorce being as unbiblical as homosexual marriage?

Pops...you might want to take that 2X4 out of your eye...

This may very well be the worst post I've ever seen on any message board.

1. I have not bombed an abortion clinic, nor would I support that action. I would strongly condemn it.
2. I have not been in a WalMart in almost 10 years -- and when I did go there, I never cared if anyone said "Merry Christmas" to me or not.
3. Attaching Luke 6:31 to the idea of sodomite "marriage" is one of the dumbest things ever.
4. I can't remember ever protesting anything at a courthouse or attorney's office. I don't know that I've ever participated in any real public protest... ever.

poptart wrote:

Dinsdale wrote:So, it's pretty safe to assume that Pop is OK with the raping and kidnapping portions of the bible.

And stoning sassy children to death.

God's children haven't been living under the law for 2,000 yrs now, Dins.

Romans 10:4
For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth

Yet you freely quote from the OT as justification for laws others being treated the same as you.

Ponderous...

Dins was citing THE LAW, not the whole of OT Scripture.


In Genesis 2:22-24, God clearly established what marriage is - and Jesus, btw, VERIFIED it.
Matthew 19:3-6.

Now can you show me any Scripture at all, anywhere, that informs us that two homosexuals can be a marriage?

My opinion is that the state should separate itself from marriage as much as possible. It should recognize contractual unions and call them whatever the fukk it wants to call them. And they need to stop setting tax rates based on marital status, which, IMO is a real violation of equal treatment, much more than all the other alleged unequal treatment arguements. The tax system should be real simple. It should have fukk all to do with your mortgage interest, marital status, what kind of fukking car you drive, whether or not you have a magic shade tree....etc.

Chip, I have a question for you. What is your opinion on the old lady in Washington state who is being railroaded because she told a customer that she could not do flowers for his gay wedding? She is actually friends with the gay dude and recommended another florist. He doesn't have a problem with her and did not initiate the lawsuit.

Don't know about jsc's, but my opinion is that a florist who doesn't want business from queers is a terrible businessperson.

Jsc810 wrote:This is just from my memory, which very well may be flawed, and I may be confusing cases. But it is my general understanding that the Washington case is being brought under state law grounds, that the state (or local government) passed an anti-discrimination law that specifically included homosexuals, and that the case was a clear example of discrimination thereunder.

Your memory is correct.

smackaholic;
Your idea works for me, but the conservatives would never go for such an idea. It's obvious from their "gays want special rights" arguments that they don't want others to have what they have.

It should be interesting to see what happens with Moore & his ilk when SCOTUS comes down with their decision. It would be cool to see them being held in contempt of court.

Sudden Sam wrote:Moore's been booted out of the same position before. I'm not a fan, but the man definitely doesn't back down from his convictions.

And after this latest episode he should end up with another conviction.

R-Jack wrote:Don't know about jsc's, but my opinion is that a florist who doesn't want business from queers is a terrible businessperson.

Agreed, but that is not the question.

If I were a florist, I'd do a cake for mace and his sheep, so long as the check cleared. But, that is not what this is about. It is about forcing someone to conduct business in a way that goes against their personal beliefs. If she said I will not do business with fags, period, I might see a case. But, she has done business with the guy and is apparently actually friends with him. She referred him to someone else for the work.

This was discussed on Wilkow's show the other day and someone brought up a good point. Let's say you are a muzzie or jew caterer. Someone comes to you and says I wan't you to cater an event and I want pulled pork sammiches. Would you tell the kosher/halal caterer to just man up and get to pulling pork? I mean, why should someone be denied his pulled pork sammi, just because some superstitious kike won't make it because an imaginary figure told him he couldn't eat it 4000 years ago?

While I agree with you, Holic, and think anyone should be able to do or not do business with anyone, for any reason, Washington (and Oregon) have laws that subject private businesses to anti-discrimination laws (complete affront to personal freedom, IMO).

So argue against the law all you like, but that individual case is pretty cut-and-dried. Just like the cake shop here in Oregon.

Come one 'holic you know this tune.


The rag head caterer can refuse to provide pulled pork sammiches all day long for Derron's gathering. But as soon as Derron's company refuses to proved a cake with an image of Jesus being sodimized to the rag head, the ACLU will be up in arms.