Page 1 of 1

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 9:53 pm
by Dinsdale
Few players as good at the up-the-gut blocking as Unger (QQMF).

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 11:20 pm
by Joe in PB
Jimmy Graham, separated at birth from Sam Bowie.

Image

Image

I think there is some question whether his shoulder will be 100% next season. I believe Payton made the trade in case it isn't, eliminating having to cut him the following year to dump his 10 mil a year salary and getting nothing.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:15 am
by Diego in Seattle
I can't say that I care for this trade. We already have a couple of very good TE's, and our O-line has been suspect at times. Unger was rather injury prone last season, but I don't think getting rid of him w/o getting more help for the line was a good idea.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:22 am
by Dinsdale
Diego in Seattle wrote:We already have a couple of very good TE's
Really?

Then why weren't they on the active roster last year?

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 12:25 am
by Joe in PB
Actually, before the trade I thought Luke Willson was due for an above average season this year.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:01 am
by Diego in Seattle
Luke Wilson definitely has the skills for the position. Thought there was a second, but I guess I missed Zach Miller being cut for failing his physical.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:07 am
by mvscal
Joe in PB wrote:Actually, before the trade I thought Luke Willson was due for an above average season this year.
Pretty big fucking difference between above average and elite.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:13 pm
by Dinsdale
The more I think about it, the dumber this trade sounds. The Shithawks are primarily a running team. So they traded an all-pro center for a guy that in his career at TE, has blocked approximately... no one, ever?

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 2:21 am
by Joe in PB

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:05 pm
by Mikey
Papa Willie wrote:The Falcons are picking up a lot of fuckers that average about 3 games a season.
They should be fresh then.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 1:45 pm
by mvscal
Dinsdale wrote: The Shithawks are primarily a running team.
A running team that didn't have the confidence to pound it inside from two when all the chips were on the table.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 4:46 pm
by Joe in PB
Brain fart plain & simple. If the Seahawks would have gone to 4 WRs & spread out the NE defense. No way they would have stopped Lynch from scoring. That loss is on Pete Carroll.

Re: Jimmy G to Seattle...

Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2015 6:47 pm
by mvscal
Joe in PB wrote:That loss is on Pete Carroll.
No question about that. I understand throwing in that situation but that throw into that much traffic was begging for disaster. A back shoulder fade to someone like Graham of of play action would be an extremely high percentage play. Almost unstoppable.