T1B

Arizona State Senator Sylvia Allen says that church attendance should be made mandatory.

How's that "less government" platform coming along, hypocrites?

Yet another repukeblican shows that they have no respect for the Constitution.

No one is going to disagree with you.

Now if you want a good debate bring up the new Indiana law.

Forcing folks to do things is generally a libtard thing. Pay no attention to this holly roller broad.

Oh. Never mind. I thought this was going to be a thread on Bowe Bergdahl and his impending vacation in Ft. Leavenworth.

Left Seater wrote:No one is going to disagree with you.

Now if you want a good debate bring up the new Indiana law.

Did you mean this one?

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Left Seater wrote:No one is going to disagree with you.

Now if you want a good debate bring up the new Indiana law.

Did you mean this one?

yeah, i've been to that place....it's called
"Fags Stay Away Bar and Grill"

they serve a mean pepper steak......

Felix wrote:

Diego in Seattle wrote:

Left Seater wrote:No one is going to disagree with you.

Now if you want a good debate bring up the new Indiana law.

Did you mean this one?

yeah, i've been to that place....it's called
"Fags Stay Away Bar and Grill"

they serve a mean pepper steak......

So, what's the problem? He shouldn't have to serve faggots and you don't have to eat there if that offends you.

It's called freedom. Why do you hate it so much?

God Hates Marinated Steaks

I'll see your Arizona flake-job Christer, and I'll call your Indiana Christo-Nazi, and raise you a California Reaper For Christ..

Hi, Jesus looked like me...and I also hate the EPA, labor unions, and corporate taxes...


SODOMITE SUPPRESSION ACT

Penal Code section 39
a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also
sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty,
commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he
overthrew Sodom and Gomorrha.
b) Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than that
all of us should be killed by God's just wrath against us for the folly
of tolerating-wickedness in our midst, the People of California wisely
command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another
person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to
death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.
c) No person shall distribute, perform, or transmit sodomistic
propaganda directly or indirectly by any means to any person under the
age of majority. Sodomistic propaganda is defined as anything aimed at
creating an interest in or an acceptance of human sexual relations other
than between a man and a woman. Every offender shall be fined $1 million
per occurrence, and/or imprisoned up to 10 years, and/or expelled from
the boundaries of the state of California for up to life.
d) No person shall serve in any public office, nor serve in public
employment, nor enjoy any public benefit, who is a sodomite or who espouses
sodomistic propaganda or who belongs to any group that does.
e) This law is effective immediately and shall not be rendered
ineffective nor invalidated by any court, state or federal, until heard
by a quorum of the Supreme Court of California consisting only of judges
who are neither sodomites nor subject to disqualification hereunder.
f) The state has an affirmative duty to defend and enforce this law
as written, and every member of the public has standing to seek its
enforcement and obtain reimbursement for all costs and attorney's fees
in so doing, and further, should the state persist in inaction over 1 year
after due notice, the general public is empowered and deputized to execute
all the provisions hereunder extra-judicially, immune from any charge and
indemnified by the state against any and all liability.
g) This law shall be known as 11The Sodomite Suppression Act" and be
numbered as section 39 in Title 3 of the Penal Code, pertaining to offences
against the sovereignty of the state. The text shall be prominently posted
in every public school classroom. All laws in conflict with this law are
to that extent invalid.

mvscal wrote:

So, what's the problem? He shouldn't have to serve faggots and you don't have to eat there if that offends you.

It's called freedom. Why do you hate it so much?

I don't.....a restaurant owner can choose to serve (or not serve) whoever he wants....
why do you think I'd have any objection to that?

mvscal wrote: So, what's the problem? He shouldn't have to serve faggots and you don't have to eat there if that offends you.

It's called freedom. Why do you hate it so much?

The problem is, how does a business owner know if the customer is gay? Perhaps a criteria would help. For example, if the customer's every other sentence included "sperm burper" or "cum guzzler" or "cock slurping" or similar reference to various dildos being used for anal penetration, well this may well indicate if not an inherent gayness, certainly a sleazy creepiness that should be shunned indeed. :wink:

LTS TRN 2 wrote: The problem is, how does a business owner know if the customer is gay?

Who cares? That's the business owner's problem...and yours, Felchie, old shoe.

LTS TRN 2 wrote: The problem is, how does a business owner know if the customer is gay?

Ofailurecal gets on his knees and turns around to look at them. If they look familiar they're gay.

Moving Sale wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote: The problem is, how does a business owner know if the customer is gay?

Ofailurecal gets on his knees and turns around to look at them. If they look familiar they're gay.

Look in the mirror you bleached haired little gaymo.

Jerkovich wrote:

Moving Sale wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote: The problem is, how does a business owner know if the customer is gay?

Ofailurecal gets on his knees and turns around to look at them. If they look familiar they're gay.

Look in the mirror you bleached haired little gaymo.

Nice IKYABWAI flag, cuckhold.

mvscal wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote: The problem is, how does a business owner know if the customer is gay?

Who cares? That's the business owner's problem...and yours, Felchie, old shoe.

But they'd have no problem recognizing you as a twisted creep, right? I mean after you spew a few "jizz slurping" references with an all-but automatic reflex.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:I mean after you spew a few "jizz slurping" references...

Get it right, numbnuts...It's "dong-slurping"...



fuuuuuuuck

Diego in Seattle wrote:Arizona State Senator Sylvia Allen says that church attendance should be made mandatory.

How's that "less government" platform coming along, hypocrites?

Yet another repukeblican shows that they have no respect for the Constitution.

So I must assume that you are in complete lockstep with everything your beloved Democratic party stands for and supports ??

Just answer the question.

LTS TRN 2 wrote:

mvscal wrote:

LTS TRN 2 wrote: The problem is, how does a business owner know if the customer is gay?

Who cares? That's the business owner's problem...and yours, Felchie, old shoe.

But they'd have no problem recognizing you as a twisted creep, right? I mean after you spew a few "jizz slurping" references with an all-but automatic reflex.

Pedo says what?