T1B

C'mon. you know this is the 2016 U.S. presidential election decision. What's your call?

Personally, I abhor each of these individuals, and regard each as toxic as the other.

I have no "dog in this fight."

That said, the appointment of Supreme Court justices remains, unfortunately, as a crucial factor in our future.

The Bush clan is an utterly criminal and foul family of failure and disaster.

Rubio is a total fake robot.

Hillary is a monstrous entity whose actual essence remains obscured.

Panetta is a power-hungry war-mongering gangster who will gladly start WWIII ('scuse me, I mean WWIV--since we're in WWIII right now)


So...what's yer pick?



"

That's some pretty good crack yer smokin', turd.

I think it will be Paul/Fiorina vs crazy joe/some wetback.

Hillary will be a bad distant memory by then. With a little luck, in jail.

Cob-up-his-ass/latest attention-getter for the R.

Hildebeast/Plan B for the D.

Bernie Sanders just raised 1.5 in his first day. I wouldn't underestimate him.

A communist from Vermont? I think was all agree that we do not need another Bush or Clinton.

Say no to the Bushtoon Dynasty

BSmack wrote:Bernie Sanders just raised 1.5 in his first day. I wouldn't underestimate him.

He'll do for the Republicans what Perot did for Billigula. The irony is quite comical.

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:Bernie Sanders just raised 1.5 in his first day. I wouldn't underestimate him.

He'll do for the Republicans what Perot did for Billigula. The irony is quite comical.

Bernie won't be running on a 3rd party line.

BSmack wrote:

mvscal wrote:

BSmack wrote:Bernie Sanders just raised 1.5 in his first day. I wouldn't underestimate him.

He'll do for the Republicans what Perot did for Billigula. The irony is quite comical.

Bernie won't be running on a 3rd party line.

Now now....Don't be bringing facts into this. You might confuse Mrs. mvsidiot's whipping boy.

So..you're all in locked denial?...

No one has any actual alternative prediction as to the respective toxic tickets?

C'mon..surely yer not not dead as mud...er..as you would appear..

Leftseater, dreaming to pretend he actually "flys air-o-planes.."..

I'm leaning towards Walker as the GOP nominee at this point. I see him as the only candidate who would be palatable to both the Chamber of Commerce shitbag establishment and conservatives.

I certainly hope it's Walker. That would make for some great entertainment in the debates. Every time he goes off the prepared script, his aides spend the next couple days explaining what he actually meant.

Right...because Hillary is such a great extemporaneous speaker.

mvscal wrote:I'm leaning towards Walker as the GOP nominee at this point. I see him as the only candidate who would be palatable to both the Chamber of Commerce shitbag establishment and conservatives.

He's an honest politician. He stays bought once he's bought.

mvscal wrote:I'm leaning towards Walker as the GOP nominee at this point.

Meaning you are leaning towards actually voting for once and you are thinking Walker is your man or you think he will get the GOP nomination?

mvscal wrote:Right...because Hillary is such a great extemporaneous speaker.

He'll probably not get a shot at Hillary if he has to debate the other Republicans. They will shred him.

Moving Sale wrote:

mvscal wrote:I'm leaning towards Walker as the GOP nominee at this point.

Meaning you are leaning towards actually voting for once and you are thinking Walker is your man or you think he will get the GOP nomination?

I clearly stated that I believe he will be the nominee. Whether or not I actually vote for him is undetermined at this point. I haven't ruled it out.

I will NOT vote for:

Clinton
Sanders
Bush
Rubio
Fiorina
Carson
Huckabee

Goober McTuber wrote:Based on this, I'm voting for Rubio.

You spelled Fiorina wrong.

Rack Jeb for living his midget porn dream.

Looks like Huckabee married his sister.

Yeah, I suppose Walker is the leading alternative, especially if he gets the Koch brothers billion dollar campaign contribution. He of is a dutiful whore of all things malignant, a stalwart of the Return to the 19th Century party of oligarchy and transnational tax flight. But with whom could such a hateful and cold character be paired so as to make him even reasonably palatable? Christie?

Christie Creme is pretty much done.

How about a GOP lunatic with a vagina? There's several to choose from.