T1B

I think the PAC did pretty well in women's golf (Stanford won the championship), but a babe from Bammer won the individual title.

Good to see the SEC do well in the sports where women is used with air quotes.

I think it's impressive actually.

You try hooting an hollering with a mouth full of box

I was all prepared to cite the $ the sec is putting into facilities and such to attract external talent but there are only 6 players from both schools inclusive from Pac 12 territory....so the answer must lie elsewhere.

schmick wrote: USC just chooses to not participate in sports that the gays are more frequent in

http://www.usctrojans.com/sports/w-golf ... f-mtt.html
http://www.usctrojans.com/sports/w-bask ... -body.html

schmick hates gays so he takes up residency in Southern California.

Makes sense.

Women's golf is pretty impressive at the major programs.

Same for tennis. I have no use for any of the other sports including beach volleyball. If your watching it for bikinis, pron can help you.

schmick wrote: Beach volleyball is the only womens NCAA sport that men, who arent related to a player or gay, will watch so its the only one that matters

You could apply the same tripe to every mens sport except for football and basketball dork.

Left Seater wrote:Women's golf is pretty impressive at the major programs.

Several years ago, I was hanging out with a chick who played golf for UDub (BOOOOOOOOO!!!! But she was kind of hot, so I let that slide). I said something like "Wow, you must be good -- not sure I want any part of you on the links."

She replied "No, not really. They just had to give the schollie to someone to sit at the end of the roster. I pretty much shot bogie."

Of course, I replied "Oh, let's play golf sometime."


Never fucked her.

And Oregon just won both the Men's and Women's track and field championships. The men won the indoor championship, as well. That's 23 total track/cross country championships.

Track Town, USA baby.

Now, just need a football title.

Miley props to Stanford on likely winning again.

The problem I have with the Director's cup is the way it is scored. It is far more a measure of the number of athletic programs at a school than an overall measure of success. 20 total sports can score points for a school, 10 mens and 10 womens. If a school has more than 10 only the top 10 scores are counted. Further some sports like skiing are counted I either the men's column or women's depending on how it Better helps the school.

On top of that many sports that have few participants are scored as well. For example only 28 schools participate in men's volleyball. Of those a number are Div II but play up. Those schools are scored in the Div II rankings meaning only 20 or so Div I schools participate in men's volleyball. Yet they all score huge points for their school since there are so few. Even the worst program is going to score the same number of points as a basketball team making the sweet 16. Hardly the same accomplishment.

A better measure would be to add up the scores from all of a schools athletic teams, not just capping it at 10, and then dividing by the number of sports they compete in to get an average per sport fielded. This tells much more than the current method.

Not to take anything away from Stanford, hell they would likely win it either way. But stop handing out a participation trophy like this is 8 year olds playing soccer without keeping score.

God Forbid Schmuckety ever has a grand daughter that is into sports. Maybe she'll be a fat lesbian as well and you can give her shit.

So if Oregon offered one of your kids a full ride and they wanted to go you'd deny them that?

schmick wrote:

Dinsdale wrote: Track Town, USA baby.

How many of those track athletes are from oregon and how many wind up at oregon because of Nike?

Let's see...

The all-time god of track and field, Steve Prefontaine... from Coos Bay. That's in Oregon, last I checked.

Olypic medal winner, and holder of many world records Galen Rupp... Portland boy.

Ashton Eaton, who destroyed all the decathalon records on the way to Olympics gold... Portland boy.

So, to answer your question -- "all the good ones." We breed 'em fast here.

So you're probably not going to like Cary Angeline, right? Or is there some bullshit loophole like "He was born in CA/His Uncle had a friend that liked USC and lived in Reseda" you will use to condone a kid making the decision he wanted to make?

Last I checked USC still plays their games in the LA Coluseum, a stadium in a neighborhood so fucked up that Raiders fans felt unsafe.

schmick wrote:TBH, I see no reason why any prep football player anywhere in the country would not go to USC or UCLA if given the opportunity. Have you seen the cities these other schools are in? Fuckin' shit holes

Yeah, it is hard to imagine why recruits would look at factors beyond just sun and sand when making the most important decision of their lives.

Hell, I'm not sure USC and UCLA are even the best options in the state of California. Maybe 10 years ago but right now? Stanford has the best overall combo of current football success, academics, and quality of life.

And while I'm sure the glitz and glam of L.A. is appealing to a lot of kids, I'm sure there are also many who prefer the more traditional college environment.

schmick wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:

schmick wrote:TBH, I see no reason why any prep football player anywhere in the country would not go to USC or UCLA if given the opportunity. Have you seen the cities these other schools are in? Fuckin' shit holes

Yeah, it is hard to imagine why recruits would look at factors beyond just sun and sand when making the most important decision of their lives.

Hell, I'm not sure USC and UCLA are even the best options in the state of California. Maybe 10 years ago but right now? Stanford has the best overall combo of current football success, academics, and quality of life.

And while I'm sure the glitz and glam of L.A. is appealing to a lot of kids, I'm sure there are also many who prefer the more traditional college environment.

Top 25 Academics
Great weather
Great city with tons of things to do
Great networking
Great programs
Hot Co-eds
Beaches
Amusement Parks
Great facilities
Great alumni
Great traditions
Beautiful campuses




What is untraditional about the enviroment at USC or UCLA? Lack of Townies?

Pssst...




The New York Times



How Los Angeles Is Becoming a ‘Third World’ City


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/06/opini ... inion&_r=0







the truth

schmick wrote:And its still better than Oakland, where feCal is located

... and this is why you're a "slowcal"... and $C is still located in "south central".



If you have just a little bit of money... and your kid is too slow to get into a community college... there's always the school for "Spoiled Children" that you can use with your great great grandfather's trust fund money from owning an orange grove back in 1901 before southern California was even a school.


If SC actually had any money... they'd have their own stadium... and it would be on campus.


A real "University" has their football team play on campus... and doesn't have to rent out the closest blowing alley to play their games in.

The State wrote:the closest blowing alley

Hey Milton, your Freudian slip is showing.

The State wrote:

schmick wrote:And its still better than Oakland, where feCal is located

... and this is why you're a "slowcal"... and $C is still located in "south central".



If you have just a little bit of money... and your kid is too slow to get into a community college... there's always the school for "Spoiled Children" that you can use with your great great grandfather's trust fund money from owning an orange grove back in 1901 before southern California was even a school.


If SC actually had any money... they'd have their own stadium... and it would be on campus.


A real "University" has their football team play on campus... and doesn't have to rent out the closest blowing alley to play their games in.

But it's kind of a cool bowling alley...

The Stool wrote:If SC actually had any money... they'd have their own stadium... and it would be on campus.


A real "University" has their football team play on campus... and doesn't have to rent out the closest blowing alley to play their games in.

You are understandably stupid... since you've never graduated from Cal. You lie about going there and nobody buys it.

The truth is the USC alumni has had plans and millions of dollars to develop the entire surrounding area around campus from earlier than when I was a student and... a 1986 graduate from USC. There have been many problems doing that with the LA city council including relocating the surrounding "inhabitants," etc. Interestingly, UCLA doesn't have an on-campus stadium either. Do you know how far Pasadena's Rose Bowl is from the UCLA campus?

You are a complete and total fool, mstoolio. It's never a shock when you KYOA with every single post in any forum.

Good god... someone put "the tranny" from California's "Oklahoma" (Fresno)... back in the closet.

She follows me around to every forum I post in... it's scary. She literally comes on this board and the first thing she does... is search my posts.


Unreal.





Anyways, sc is in South Central LA... one of the biggest shitholes in California.



South Central LA...









On the other hand, Cal is in Berkeley... NOT Oakland.




Berkeley... San Francisco Bay Area...


University of California... looking across the bay... (left to right) San Francisco, Alcatraz, the Golden Gate Bridge, and Marin County (home of the truth)




Berkeley Hills...





Berkeley Hills... looking across the bay to San Francisco (the most beautiful City in the World) and it's not even close.






Game over...

mstoolio originally said the reason USC doesn't have an on campus stadium is because they don't have the funding and I gave a valid reason the shit poster is wrong. So what does a shit poster do when it doesn't have a defense? Ignore facts, deflect the fact it is not a Cal grad, and then go to the cellar while getting its ass reamed once again.

mstoolio, I read this forum and the NFL all of the time. The unique thing about these 2 forums is the contributors actually know what they are talking about. Therefore, I don't need to "chime" in very often to disagree with anyone's posts except, your lying and fabricated shit.

You are the ultimate nutsack swinger and juice drainer off a school that doesn't even know YOU exist. Save your pics in response. You didn't graduate from there.

The State wrote:

Why the hell is there still a pay phone anywhere? What with Obama's free phones and all. But how about the folks that live in that house in the background. They have to navigate around said phone to get to their front door. Wait check that, there isn't a door handle on that door, so they must use the one around back. Plus if anyone actually used that phone they prolly have to listen to it.