Voting resources...
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 4:33 pm
So yesterday I catch part of the noon local news and some young reporter is talking to an older lady who waited 25 minutes to vote. The older lady was Hispanic and the reporter was leading her towards the wait being a voter suppression tactic. I rolled my eyes and thought to myself the older lady's wait was far better than my precinct.
Then last night on the late local news the same reporter had updated her story. Apparently she went to other precincts to try to support her waiting as voter suppression and found that most of the primarily minority precincts had zero wait. She even found one where there were a total of 11 voters all day. She pointed out that the precinct where the old lady voted had a couple hundred people vote. She then interviewed a local election official who stated that each precinct received the same number of electronic voting booths, 8 each. The young reporter then asked if the voting booths should be allocated differently based on historical voting totals by precinct. She pointed out that in one precinct each booth averaged less than 2 voters per booth while the old ladies had 40 times more use. The election official said that wasn't his decision to make.
So this young reporter who was angling for a voter suppression story actually found one but in the opposite direction of what she thought it might be.
But that leads to a bigger question. Should voting resources and precinct size be based on historical trends?
Then last night on the late local news the same reporter had updated her story. Apparently she went to other precincts to try to support her waiting as voter suppression and found that most of the primarily minority precincts had zero wait. She even found one where there were a total of 11 voters all day. She pointed out that the precinct where the old lady voted had a couple hundred people vote. She then interviewed a local election official who stated that each precinct received the same number of electronic voting booths, 8 each. The young reporter then asked if the voting booths should be allocated differently based on historical voting totals by precinct. She pointed out that in one precinct each booth averaged less than 2 voters per booth while the old ladies had 40 times more use. The election official said that wasn't his decision to make.
So this young reporter who was angling for a voter suppression story actually found one but in the opposite direction of what she thought it might be.
But that leads to a bigger question. Should voting resources and precinct size be based on historical trends?