Page 1 of 1
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2016 3:02 pm
by Screw_Michigan
Naked photos of Pam Anderson were the first thing I did in 1996 when my parents got a free trial of AOL. The irony is, indeed, overwhelming.
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:34 pm
by smackaholic
5 minutes of waiting for a single naked pic of Pam.
I do not miss 1996 free AOL dial-up pron surfing at all.
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:43 pm
by BSmack
Is she going to give back all the money from those Playboy shots that gave her the fame she now has so that she can be an anti-sceince cunt?
Fuck her and the measles.
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 1:14 pm
by R-Jack
Screw_Michigan wrote:Naked photos of Pam Anderson were the first thing I did in 1996 when my parents got a free trial of AOL. The irony is, indeed, overwhelming.
And swollen
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:35 pm
by Moving Sale
Rules? I would go ahead and post a naked pic of PA but I would probably be banned since I "didn't post a tag in the title."
Asshats
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:47 pm
by Moving Sale
Papa Willie wrote:
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:57 pm
by Diego in Seattle
Is there something wrong with railing against porn after years of selling one's body?
Sincerely,
Re: Porn is for Losers
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 7:54 pm
by R-Jack
Moving Sale wrote:Rules? I would go ahead and post a naked pic of PA but I would probably be banned since I "didn't post a tag in the title."
Asshats
You're welcome
Re: Porn is for Losers (i)
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:43 pm
by Moving Sale
Oops wrong slut/s.